Re: defining 0day
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Brian Loe wrote:
> On 9/25/07, Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org> wrote:
>
>> Okay. I think we exhausted the different views, and maybe we are now able
>> to come to a conlusion on what we WANT 0day to mean.
>>
>> What do you, as professional, believe 0day should mean, regardless of
>> previous definitions?
>
>
> Seems to me that definitions, and language itself, is a product of
> evolution. You can't just remove all previous meanings. Its better
> anyway to stick to the most accepted, acknowledged and DOCUMENTED
> definitions:
No longer good enough.
We can get a press scare over a public vuln release, or a wake-up call.
I think we can do better as an industry.
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 12 篇)：