[光纖] 降價未告知 民代控中華電信A十億
來源
http://iservice.libertytimes.com.tw/liveNews/news.php?no=494966&type=%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB
降價未告知 民代控中華電信A十億 【11:26】
〔記者劉榮/台北報導〕電信費率行情亂,消費爭議頻傳,中華電信自去年8月對光世代10M用戶降價為每月930元,但卻未通知老客戶,絕大多數早就綁約到期的老客戶仍傻傻適用999元,每月白白多繳69元,北市議員王鴻薇指控,10M的用戶大約有170多萬勳戶,華信等於這段期間就A了用戶10億元。
對此,中華電信行銷企劃處長張勳騰表示,930元是新客戶的綁約優惠價,針對舊客戶的優惠,目前中華電信已經在擬定新的方案,新的合約價,會比930元更優惠,但因目前尚未通過NCC審核,因此目前還無法公布。
台北市議員王鴻薇上午召開記者會,抨擊中華電信吃定老客戶,舊戶不如新戶的作法嚴重侵害消費者權益,要求台北市消保官介入調查,如果綁約到期的老客戶仍在適用999費率,應該要求中華電信退費。
王鴻薇指出,民眾向她陳情表示,自己是中華電信光世代10M的老客戶,目前為無約狀態並月繳999元。日前上網看到光世代10M新戶只要月繳930,才驚覺自己每月多繳69元,經向中華電信投訴後,中華電信同意退還今年一至四月溢繳費用。
中華電信更可議的,因為已有消費者要求退費,所以立刻悄悄更改網頁價格,顯示每月999元,但是實際價格是第一年930元,可見中華電信只是一味欺暪老客戶,以避免龐大的退款金額。
王鴻薇說,中華電信光世代10M的用戶大約有170多萬,而中華電信自去年8月開始,光世代10M的價格就是930元,中華電信接獲民眾反應後,表示願意退款給該位民眾,卻同時立即更改網頁價格,其目的就在於避免多達170萬用戶近10億的退款。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.46.174.98
推
05/11 12:53, , 1F
05/11 12:53, 1F
推
05/11 13:16, , 2F
05/11 13:16, 2F
推
05/11 13:35, , 3F
05/11 13:35, 3F
→
05/11 13:37, , 4F
05/11 13:37, 4F
→
05/11 13:39, , 5F
05/11 13:39, 5F
推
05/11 13:47, , 6F
05/11 13:47, 6F
→
05/11 13:54, , 7F
05/11 13:54, 7F
推
05/11 13:55, , 8F
05/11 13:55, 8F
→
05/11 13:56, , 9F
05/11 13:56, 9F
→
05/11 13:56, , 10F
05/11 13:56, 10F
→
05/11 13:56, , 11F
05/11 13:56, 11F
→
05/11 13:57, , 12F
05/11 13:57, 12F
→
05/11 13:57, , 13F
05/11 13:57, 13F
→
05/11 13:58, , 14F
05/11 13:58, 14F
推
05/11 14:00, , 15F
05/11 14:00, 15F
→
05/11 14:01, , 16F
05/11 14:01, 16F
→
05/11 14:31, , 17F
05/11 14:31, 17F
→
05/11 14:32, , 18F
05/11 14:32, 18F
→
05/11 14:32, , 19F
05/11 14:32, 19F
推
05/11 15:28, , 20F
05/11 15:28, 20F
→
05/11 15:41, , 21F
05/11 15:41, 21F
推
05/11 15:43, , 22F
05/11 15:43, 22F
→
05/11 15:44, , 23F
05/11 15:44, 23F
推
05/11 15:49, , 24F
05/11 15:49, 24F
推
05/11 16:26, , 25F
05/11 16:26, 25F
推
05/11 16:36, , 26F
05/11 16:36, 26F
→
05/11 16:38, , 27F
05/11 16:38, 27F
→
05/11 16:39, , 28F
05/11 16:39, 28F
→
05/11 16:40, , 29F
05/11 16:40, 29F
推
05/11 16:49, , 30F
05/11 16:49, 30F
→
05/11 16:50, , 31F
05/11 16:50, 31F
→
05/11 16:51, , 32F
05/11 16:51, 32F
→
05/11 16:52, , 33F
05/11 16:52, 33F
→
05/11 16:52, , 34F
05/11 16:52, 34F
噓
05/11 17:34, , 35F
05/11 17:34, 35F
推
05/11 18:24, , 36F
05/11 18:24, 36F
→
05/11 18:25, , 37F
05/11 18:25, 37F
→
05/11 18:26, , 38F
05/11 18:26, 38F
→
05/11 18:27, , 39F
05/11 18:27, 39F
→
05/11 18:28, , 40F
05/11 18:28, 40F
推
05/11 18:46, , 41F
05/11 18:46, 41F
→
05/11 18:47, , 42F
05/11 18:47, 42F
→
05/11 18:48, , 43F
05/11 18:48, 43F
推
05/11 18:53, , 44F
05/11 18:53, 44F
推
05/11 20:01, , 45F
05/11 20:01, 45F
→
05/11 21:25, , 46F
05/11 21:25, 46F
推
05/11 22:00, , 47F
05/11 22:00, 47F
→
05/12 00:30, , 48F
05/12 00:30, 48F
→
05/12 01:09, , 49F
05/12 01:09, 49F
→
05/12 09:53, , 50F
05/12 09:53, 50F
→
05/12 09:54, , 51F
05/12 09:54, 51F
→
05/12 09:55, , 52F
05/12 09:55, 52F
→
05/12 09:55, , 53F
05/12 09:55, 53F
→
05/12 09:56, , 54F
05/12 09:56, 54F
噓
05/12 12:32, , 55F
05/12 12:32, 55F
→
05/12 12:32, , 56F
05/12 12:32, 56F
推
05/12 13:55, , 57F
05/12 13:55, 57F
→
05/12 13:56, , 58F
05/12 13:56, 58F
→
05/12 20:55, , 59F
05/12 20:55, 59F
→
05/12 20:57, , 60F
05/12 20:57, 60F
→
05/12 21:00, , 61F
05/12 21:00, 61F
推
05/12 23:47, , 62F
05/12 23:47, 62F
推
05/13 12:22, , 63F
05/13 12:22, 63F
→
05/13 14:19, , 64F
05/13 14:19, 64F
→
05/13 14:20, , 65F
05/13 14:20, 65F
→
05/13 14:21, , 66F
05/13 14:21, 66F
→
05/13 14:22, , 67F
05/13 14:22, 67F
推
05/16 14:43, , 68F
05/16 14:43, 68F
→
05/16 14:44, , 69F
05/16 14:44, 69F
→
05/16 14:45, , 70F
05/16 14:45, 70F
→
05/16 14:46, , 71F
05/16 14:46, 71F
→
10/05 11:44, , 72F
10/05 11:44, 72F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):