Re: [討論] 重新修訂BWS 1C後的轉換答叫
Please kindly provide your comments and suggestions.
1C後轉換答叫
1C-
1D 4+H, 5+, may have 4+D if INV-
1H 4+S, 5+, may have 4+D if INV-
1S 4+D, 8+, 3-M if INV-
1N 4+D, 5-7, or 3334 5-10
1C-1D
1H 4+S unbal, 12-18
1S unbal, 15-16 -> NMF can be used here
1N semi-BAL 12-14 -> TWPCB
2C 6+C 12-14
2D C+D 17+ or 6+C 17-18 -> 2H F1, 2N min, other FG
2H 4H or 3H w/ short 12-15
2S C+S 19+
3C 6+C 19+
1C-1H
2D C+D 17+ or 6+C 17-18 -> 2S NF, 2N min, other FG
2H C+H 17+ -> 2N min
other same as above
1C-1S
1N semi-BAL 12-14
2C 6+C 12-14
2D 4D or 3D w/ short 12-15
2H C+H 15+ or 6+C 15-16 -> 2N min, 2S ask, other NAT
2S C+S 15+ -> 2N min, other FG NAT
3C 6+C 17+
1C-1N NAT
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 27.147.16.50
推
05/11 19:02, , 1F
05/11 19:02, 1F
→
05/11 19:03, , 2F
05/11 19:03, 2F
→
05/11 19:03, , 3F
05/11 19:03, 3F
→
05/11 19:52, , 4F
05/11 19:52, 4F
這裡有幾種牌會需要在1S和1N中處理
3334 5-10
4+D 4-M 5-12
5+D 12+ FG
在 滷教授的 K-S 中,
1C-1S = 8+ 4+D
-1N = 5-7 no M
但是在自然制中,
3334 8-10 不能叫 mixed raise,
所以就多了一種牌需要處理.
---
1C-1S 保證 8+的好處是後面的建設性叫牌會比較容易設計,
然後後果就是1C-1N 會很不妙.
所以這裡要怎麼處理就需要各位提供您寶貴的意見了.
※ 編輯: davidpanda 來自: 27.147.16.50 (05/12 00:22)
推
05/12 10:49, , 5F
05/12 10:49, 5F
→
05/12 10:50, , 6F
05/12 10:50, 6F
→
05/12 10:51, , 7F
05/12 10:51, 7F
推
05/12 13:04, , 8F
05/12 13:04, 8F
→
05/12 13:05, , 9F
05/12 13:05, 9F
→
05/12 13:05, , 10F
05/12 13:05, 10F
→
05/12 13:06, , 11F
05/12 13:06, 11F
→
05/12 13:41, , 12F
05/12 13:41, 12F
→
05/12 13:41, , 13F
05/12 13:41, 13F
→
05/12 13:42, , 14F
05/12 13:42, 14F
→
05/12 13:43, , 15F
05/12 13:43, 15F
→
05/12 15:29, , 16F
05/12 15:29, 16F
→
05/12 15:29, , 17F
05/12 15:29, 17F
→
05/12 15:30, , 18F
05/12 15:30, 18F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文：
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇)：