Re: [新聞] 中職2020可望有6隊 新球隊可從舊球隊選人
我個人覺得這樣幹嘛還要再二軍打一年
直接上來一軍阿
而且業餘球隊養球員這麼多年
帶進來的球員還不能自己用
要打散
我是覺得業餘有球隊的就帶進來+4隊設置非保護名單+洋將名額多一位
這樣直接從明年開季開始打
應該不至於實力落差到太大
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.217.201.135
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1505120780.A.2B7.html
推
09/11 17:08, , 1F
09/11 17:08, 1F
→
09/11 17:08, , 2F
09/11 17:08, 2F
認同
那一年燒的錢還不如
強制規定為該主場縣市的強制宣傳費用
例如強化在地連結 主場整修 宣傳等等
推
09/11 17:08, , 3F
09/11 17:08, 3F
推
09/11 17:08, , 4F
09/11 17:08, 4F
→
09/11 17:08, , 5F
09/11 17:08, 5F
→
09/11 17:08, , 6F
09/11 17:08, 6F
推
09/11 17:09, , 7F
09/11 17:09, 7F
推
09/11 17:09, , 8F
09/11 17:09, 8F
推
09/11 17:09, , 9F
09/11 17:09, 9F
※ 編輯: btm978952 (180.217.201.135), 09/11/2017 17:09:59
推
09/11 17:10, , 10F
09/11 17:10, 10F
各人覺得可以登錄守位最多3人
例如投手最多3人或野手最多3人
至於要3投1野
1投3野還是2投2野就交給各球團決定
推
09/11 17:10, , 11F
09/11 17:10, 11F
推
09/11 17:10, , 12F
09/11 17:10, 12F
→
09/11 17:11, , 13F
09/11 17:11, 13F
→
09/11 17:11, , 14F
09/11 17:11, 14F
※ 編輯: btm978952 (180.217.201.135), 09/11/2017 17:11:45
→
09/11 17:13, , 15F
09/11 17:13, 15F
推
09/11 17:14, , 16F
09/11 17:14, 16F
推
09/11 17:14, , 17F
09/11 17:14, 17F
→
09/11 17:15, , 18F
09/11 17:15, 18F
推
09/11 17:16, , 19F
09/11 17:16, 19F
推
09/11 17:16, , 20F
09/11 17:16, 20F
→
09/11 17:16, , 21F
09/11 17:16, 21F
→
09/11 17:17, , 22F
09/11 17:17, 22F
→
09/11 17:18, , 23F
09/11 17:18, 23F
→
09/11 17:18, , 24F
09/11 17:18, 24F
→
09/11 17:19, , 25F
09/11 17:19, 25F
→
09/11 17:19, , 26F
09/11 17:19, 26F
→
09/11 17:19, , 27F
09/11 17:19, 27F
→
09/11 17:20, , 28F
09/11 17:20, 28F
→
09/11 17:21, , 29F
09/11 17:21, 29F
推
09/11 17:21, , 30F
09/11 17:21, 30F
→
09/11 17:22, , 31F
09/11 17:22, 31F
→
09/11 17:22, , 32F
09/11 17:22, 32F
→
09/11 17:23, , 33F
09/11 17:23, 33F
→
09/11 17:23, , 34F
09/11 17:23, 34F
→
09/11 17:23, , 35F
09/11 17:23, 35F
→
09/11 17:24, , 36F
09/11 17:24, 36F
推
09/11 17:24, , 37F
09/11 17:24, 37F
推
09/11 17:25, , 38F
09/11 17:25, 38F
→
09/11 17:25, , 39F
09/11 17:25, 39F
→
09/11 17:26, , 40F
09/11 17:26, 40F
推
09/11 17:27, , 41F
09/11 17:27, 41F
推
09/11 17:29, , 42F
09/11 17:29, 42F
推
09/11 17:30, , 43F
09/11 17:30, 43F
→
09/11 17:30, , 44F
09/11 17:30, 44F
→
09/11 17:35, , 45F
09/11 17:35, 45F
→
09/11 17:38, , 46F
09/11 17:38, 46F
噓
09/11 17:43, , 47F
09/11 17:43, 47F
推
09/11 17:51, , 48F
09/11 17:51, 48F
推
09/11 17:54, , 49F
09/11 17:54, 49F
噓
09/11 18:02, , 50F
09/11 18:02, 50F
推
09/11 18:08, , 51F
09/11 18:08, 51F
→
09/11 18:09, , 52F
09/11 18:09, 52F
推
09/11 18:11, , 53F
09/11 18:11, 53F
噓
09/11 18:13, , 54F
09/11 18:13, 54F
噓
09/11 18:15, , 55F
09/11 18:15, 55F
→
09/11 18:15, , 56F
09/11 18:15, 56F
推
09/11 18:20, , 57F
09/11 18:20, 57F
推
09/11 18:42, , 58F
09/11 18:42, 58F
推
09/11 19:11, , 59F
09/11 19:11, 59F
推
09/11 19:26, , 60F
09/11 19:26, 60F
→
09/11 19:26, , 61F
09/11 19:26, 61F
推
09/11 19:29, , 62F
09/11 19:29, 62F
→
09/11 19:29, , 63F
09/11 19:29, 63F
推
09/11 19:30, , 64F
09/11 19:30, 64F
推
09/11 19:36, , 65F
09/11 19:36, 65F
→
09/11 19:36, , 66F
09/11 19:36, 66F
推
09/11 19:40, , 67F
09/11 19:40, 67F
推
09/11 19:41, , 68F
09/11 19:41, 68F
推
09/11 19:47, , 69F
09/11 19:47, 69F
推
09/11 20:54, , 70F
09/11 20:54, 70F
→
09/11 20:54, , 71F
09/11 20:54, 71F
→
09/11 20:54, , 72F
09/11 20:54, 72F
→
09/11 20:56, , 73F
09/11 20:56, 73F
→
09/11 20:56, , 74F
09/11 20:56, 74F
→
09/11 20:59, , 75F
09/11 20:59, 75F
→
09/11 20:59, , 76F
09/11 20:59, 76F
→
09/11 20:59, , 77F
09/11 20:59, 77F
推
09/11 21:31, , 78F
09/11 21:31, 78F
→
09/11 21:31, , 79F
09/11 21:31, 79F
→
09/11 21:32, , 80F
09/11 21:32, 80F
→
09/12 10:44, , 81F
09/12 10:44, 81F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 4 篇):