Re: [新聞] 先發4局領先退場 洪宸宇:65球很多嗎?
看板Baseball作者chungrew (work hard, play hard)時間6年前 (2017/09/05 23:52)推噓17(18推 1噓 30→)留言49則, 28人參與討論串2/7 (看更多)
65球對於先發投手當然不能算多
但對於一個剛剛轉先發的投手來說 確實偏多了
而且史奈德也已經跟他講換掉他的原因 就是想贏球
基本上 美國等西方國家的訓練與比賽體系 比較科學合理
比較不會把投手操到掛掉才換 而是會參考選手體能、控球狀況以及比賽形勢綜合判斷
美國真的常常會看到 總教練換投的時候 投手還不太甘願的樣子 但也乖乖服從了
而且本場比賽到了第四局
投手控球已經蠻不穩了 再撐下去也有可能被打
既然如此 換掉他有什麼不對?
我是蠻支持史奈德的調度
他想要投更多球數 先用穩定表現給總教練信心 再來吧
大家覺得呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.234.6.220
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1504626721.A.5DE.html
→
09/05 23:53, , 1F
09/05 23:53, 1F
→
09/05 23:53, , 2F
09/05 23:53, 2F
推
09/05 23:53, , 3F
09/05 23:53, 3F
→
09/05 23:54, , 4F
09/05 23:54, 4F
推
09/05 23:54, , 5F
09/05 23:54, 5F
推
09/05 23:54, , 6F
09/05 23:54, 6F
推
09/05 23:54, , 7F
09/05 23:54, 7F
→
09/05 23:55, , 8F
09/05 23:55, 8F
→
09/05 23:56, , 9F
09/05 23:56, 9F
推
09/05 23:56, , 10F
09/05 23:56, 10F
→
09/05 23:56, , 11F
09/05 23:56, 11F
→
09/05 23:56, , 12F
09/05 23:56, 12F
推
09/05 23:57, , 13F
09/05 23:57, 13F
推
09/05 23:57, , 14F
09/05 23:57, 14F
→
09/05 23:58, , 15F
09/05 23:58, 15F
推
09/05 23:59, , 16F
09/05 23:59, 16F
推
09/06 00:00, , 17F
09/06 00:00, 17F
→
09/06 00:01, , 18F
09/06 00:01, 18F
→
09/06 00:01, , 19F
09/06 00:01, 19F
推
09/06 00:02, , 20F
09/06 00:02, 20F
→
09/06 00:03, , 21F
09/06 00:03, 21F
推
09/06 00:05, , 22F
09/06 00:05, 22F
→
09/06 00:05, , 23F
09/06 00:05, 23F
→
09/06 00:05, , 24F
09/06 00:05, 24F
→
09/06 00:05, , 25F
09/06 00:05, 25F
→
09/06 00:06, , 26F
09/06 00:06, 26F
推
09/06 00:07, , 27F
09/06 00:07, 27F
→
09/06 00:08, , 28F
09/06 00:08, 28F
推
09/06 00:10, , 29F
09/06 00:10, 29F
推
09/06 00:13, , 30F
09/06 00:13, 30F
→
09/06 00:14, , 31F
09/06 00:14, 31F
→
09/06 00:14, , 32F
09/06 00:14, 32F
推
09/06 00:15, , 33F
09/06 00:15, 33F
→
09/06 00:15, , 34F
09/06 00:15, 34F
→
09/06 00:23, , 35F
09/06 00:23, 35F
→
09/06 00:23, , 36F
09/06 00:23, 36F
→
09/06 00:27, , 37F
09/06 00:27, 37F
→
09/06 00:27, , 38F
09/06 00:27, 38F
→
09/06 00:44, , 39F
09/06 00:44, 39F
→
09/06 00:45, , 40F
09/06 00:45, 40F
→
09/06 00:45, , 41F
09/06 00:45, 41F
推
09/06 00:55, , 42F
09/06 00:55, 42F
推
09/06 01:28, , 43F
09/06 01:28, 43F
→
09/06 01:29, , 44F
09/06 01:29, 44F
推
09/06 01:51, , 45F
09/06 01:51, 45F
噓
09/06 02:33, , 46F
09/06 02:33, 46F
→
09/06 02:33, , 47F
09/06 02:33, 47F
→
09/06 02:34, , 48F
09/06 02:34, 48F
→
09/06 08:40, , 49F
09/06 08:40, 49F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 7 篇):