[討論] 分析桃猿客場票房不好的原因
分析桃猿客場票房不好的原因
中職目前只有4隊
桃猿主場票房最好 遠高於其他三隊
中信主場票房下滑不少 但仍有一定人數 居於第二
富邦及統一主場票房最差 兩隊差距不大
因為富邦及統一主場票房差 所以桃猿做客這兩隊 客場票房自然差
只有做客兄弟 客場人數才能變好
桃猿客場人數:
醜2+帥1 所以客場票房差
以富邦及統一而言
因為桃猿及中信主場票房不錯
所以當富邦及統一 做客桃猿及中信 客場票房自然也會不錯
只有富邦及統一對打時 彼此客場票房才會變差
富邦、統一客場人數:
帥2+醜1 所以客場票房還不錯
中信號稱全台百萬球迷 主客場觀眾人數差異不大
所以能在客場人數 居於領先地位
因此桃猿客場票房居末 其中一個主因
就是桃猿主場票房太好 讓其他隊伍客場人數增加
如果中職有6隊或8隊 這種狀況就不會明顯了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 39.9.7.206
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1504337559.A.DC6.html
噓
09/02 15:32, , 1F
09/02 15:32, 1F
→
09/02 15:33, , 2F
09/02 15:33, 2F
→
09/02 15:33, , 3F
09/02 15:33, 3F
推
09/02 15:33, , 4F
09/02 15:33, 4F
只是分析而已
噓
09/02 15:33, , 5F
09/02 15:33, 5F
推
09/02 15:34, , 6F
09/02 15:34, 6F
沒有檢討客隊 只是分析
噓
09/02 15:34, , 7F
09/02 15:34, 7F
推
09/02 15:34, , 8F
09/02 15:34, 8F
噓
09/02 15:34, , 9F
09/02 15:34, 9F
沒有檢討客場 只是分析
噓
09/02 15:34, , 10F
09/02 15:34, 10F
噓
09/02 15:34, , 11F
09/02 15:34, 11F
→
09/02 15:35, , 12F
09/02 15:35, 12F
代表富邦不會經營主場 這道理很簡單 有需要分析嗎?
噓
09/02 15:35, , 13F
09/02 15:35, 13F
噓
09/02 15:35, , 14F
09/02 15:35, 14F
噓
09/02 15:35, , 15F
09/02 15:35, 15F
就只是分析而已
噓
09/02 15:35, , 16F
09/02 15:35, 16F
客場本來就沒賺到 就只是分析
噓
09/02 15:36, , 17F
09/02 15:36, 17F
→
09/02 15:36, , 18F
09/02 15:36, 18F
客場票房本來就沒關係 只是分析而已
→
09/02 15:36, , 19F
09/02 15:36, 19F
推
09/02 15:36, , 20F
09/02 15:36, 20F
→
09/02 15:36, , 21F
09/02 15:36, 21F
噓
09/02 15:36, , 22F
09/02 15:36, 22F
→
09/02 15:36, , 23F
09/02 15:36, 23F
推
09/02 15:37, , 24F
09/02 15:37, 24F
噓
09/02 15:37, , 25F
09/02 15:37, 25F
→
09/02 15:37, , 26F
09/02 15:37, 26F
推
09/02 15:38, , 27F
09/02 15:38, 27F
→
09/02 15:38, , 28F
09/02 15:38, 28F
噓
09/02 15:38, , 29F
09/02 15:38, 29F
推
09/02 15:38, , 30F
09/02 15:38, 30F
推
09/02 15:38, , 31F
09/02 15:38, 31F
噓
09/02 15:38, , 32F
09/02 15:38, 32F
還有 76 則推文
還有 1 段內文
噓
09/02 16:29, , 109F
09/02 16:29, 109F
噓
09/02 16:30, , 110F
09/02 16:30, 110F
→
09/02 16:30, , 111F
09/02 16:30, 111F
→
09/02 16:30, , 112F
09/02 16:30, 112F
推
09/02 16:30, , 113F
09/02 16:30, 113F
→
09/02 16:30, , 114F
09/02 16:30, 114F
推
09/02 16:32, , 115F
09/02 16:32, 115F
→
09/02 16:32, , 116F
09/02 16:32, 116F
噓
09/02 16:32, , 117F
09/02 16:32, 117F
噓
09/02 16:32, , 118F
09/02 16:32, 118F
噓
09/02 16:33, , 119F
09/02 16:33, 119F
→
09/02 16:40, , 120F
09/02 16:40, 120F
→
09/02 16:41, , 121F
09/02 16:41, 121F
噓
09/02 16:46, , 122F
09/02 16:46, 122F
噓
09/02 16:50, , 123F
09/02 16:50, 123F
噓
09/02 16:52, , 124F
09/02 16:52, 124F
噓
09/02 16:52, , 125F
09/02 16:52, 125F
噓
09/02 16:52, , 126F
09/02 16:52, 126F
噓
09/02 16:57, , 127F
09/02 16:57, 127F
噓
09/02 16:57, , 128F
09/02 16:57, 128F
噓
09/02 16:59, , 129F
09/02 16:59, 129F
噓
09/02 17:01, , 130F
09/02 17:01, 130F
噓
09/02 17:02, , 131F
09/02 17:02, 131F
→
09/02 17:02, , 132F
09/02 17:02, 132F
噓
09/02 17:17, , 133F
09/02 17:17, 133F
噓
09/02 17:23, , 134F
09/02 17:23, 134F
推
09/02 17:25, , 135F
09/02 17:25, 135F
噓
09/02 17:39, , 136F
09/02 17:39, 136F
→
09/02 17:41, , 137F
09/02 17:41, 137F
噓
09/02 17:51, , 138F
09/02 17:51, 138F
推
09/02 17:58, , 139F
09/02 17:58, 139F
噓
09/02 18:04, , 140F
09/02 18:04, 140F
噓
09/02 18:06, , 141F
09/02 18:06, 141F
噓
09/02 18:41, , 142F
09/02 18:41, 142F
噓
09/02 18:41, , 143F
09/02 18:41, 143F
噓
09/02 19:21, , 144F
09/02 19:21, 144F
噓
09/02 19:23, , 145F
09/02 19:23, 145F
噓
09/02 20:01, , 146F
09/02 20:01, 146F
噓
09/02 23:19, , 147F
09/02 23:19, 147F
噓
09/03 07:04, , 148F
09/03 07:04, 148F
討論串 (同標題文章)