[討論] 克魯茲當總仔能不能雙贏?
有在考慮要不要發在北韓版
之前就有不少人甚至球評也認為
各部門教練可以請日本或西方洋教練都沒關係
但總教練還是希望能給本土的來
去年兄弟西瓜總被換的時候球團說要帶來新觀念
但綜觀整個台灣棒壇似乎沒有這種人選於是最後交給史總
姑且不論是否有球員鬥教頭或是人和出問題
但目前來看成效不彰就是事實
小弟想到如果等克魯茲從世大運回來
讓他來擔任總教練如何?
感覺他除了會教之外又很能跟台灣球員打成一片的感覺
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 39.9.161.66
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1502425735.A.70A.html
推
08/11 12:29, , 1F
08/11 12:29, 1F
※ 編輯: wasir66 (39.9.161.66), 08/11/2017 12:29:59
推
08/11 12:29, , 2F
08/11 12:29, 2F
→
08/11 12:30, , 3F
08/11 12:30, 3F
推
08/11 12:30, , 4F
08/11 12:30, 4F
→
08/11 12:31, , 5F
08/11 12:31, 5F
推
08/11 12:31, , 6F
08/11 12:31, 6F
推
08/11 12:31, , 7F
08/11 12:31, 7F
→
08/11 12:31, , 8F
08/11 12:31, 8F
推
08/11 12:31, , 9F
08/11 12:31, 9F
推
08/11 12:31, , 10F
08/11 12:31, 10F
→
08/11 12:32, , 11F
08/11 12:32, 11F
推
08/11 12:32, , 12F
08/11 12:32, 12F
→
08/11 12:32, , 13F
08/11 12:32, 13F
→
08/11 12:32, , 14F
08/11 12:32, 14F
推
08/11 12:33, , 15F
08/11 12:33, 15F
推
08/11 12:33, , 16F
08/11 12:33, 16F
噓
08/11 12:33, , 17F
08/11 12:33, 17F
→
08/11 12:34, , 18F
08/11 12:34, 18F
推
08/11 12:34, , 19F
08/11 12:34, 19F
推
08/11 12:34, , 20F
08/11 12:34, 20F
推
08/11 12:35, , 21F
08/11 12:35, 21F
→
08/11 12:36, , 22F
08/11 12:36, 22F
→
08/11 12:36, , 23F
08/11 12:36, 23F
推
08/11 12:36, , 24F
08/11 12:36, 24F
推
08/11 12:36, , 25F
08/11 12:36, 25F
推
08/11 12:37, , 26F
08/11 12:37, 26F
推
08/11 12:37, , 27F
08/11 12:37, 27F
推
08/11 12:37, , 28F
08/11 12:37, 28F
→
08/11 12:37, , 29F
08/11 12:37, 29F
→
08/11 12:38, , 30F
08/11 12:38, 30F
→
08/11 12:39, , 31F
08/11 12:39, 31F
推
08/11 12:41, , 32F
08/11 12:41, 32F
推
08/11 12:41, , 33F
08/11 12:41, 33F
→
08/11 12:42, , 34F
08/11 12:42, 34F
推
08/11 12:43, , 35F
08/11 12:43, 35F
推
08/11 12:44, , 36F
08/11 12:44, 36F
推
08/11 12:45, , 37F
08/11 12:45, 37F
推
08/11 12:45, , 38F
08/11 12:45, 38F
推
08/11 12:45, , 39F
08/11 12:45, 39F
推
08/11 12:47, , 40F
08/11 12:47, 40F
→
08/11 12:48, , 41F
08/11 12:48, 41F
→
08/11 12:48, , 42F
08/11 12:48, 42F
推
08/11 12:51, , 43F
08/11 12:51, 43F
推
08/11 12:55, , 44F
08/11 12:55, 44F
推
08/11 12:56, , 45F
08/11 12:56, 45F
推
08/11 12:57, , 46F
08/11 12:57, 46F
推
08/11 12:57, , 47F
08/11 12:57, 47F
→
08/11 13:00, , 48F
08/11 13:00, 48F
推
08/11 13:04, , 49F
08/11 13:04, 49F
→
08/11 13:04, , 50F
08/11 13:04, 50F
推
08/11 13:05, , 51F
08/11 13:05, 51F
→
08/11 13:06, , 52F
08/11 13:06, 52F
噓
08/11 13:08, , 53F
08/11 13:08, 53F
→
08/11 13:08, , 54F
08/11 13:08, 54F
→
08/11 13:08, , 55F
08/11 13:08, 55F
推
08/11 13:09, , 56F
08/11 13:09, 56F
→
08/11 13:10, , 57F
08/11 13:10, 57F
推
08/11 13:11, , 58F
08/11 13:11, 58F
→
08/11 13:11, , 59F
08/11 13:11, 59F
→
08/11 13:11, , 60F
08/11 13:11, 60F
→
08/11 13:21, , 61F
08/11 13:21, 61F
→
08/11 13:28, , 62F
08/11 13:28, 62F
噓
08/11 13:35, , 63F
08/11 13:35, 63F
→
08/11 13:36, , 64F
08/11 13:36, 64F
推
08/11 13:36, , 65F
08/11 13:36, 65F
→
08/11 13:37, , 66F
08/11 13:37, 66F
→
08/11 13:54, , 67F
08/11 13:54, 67F
推
08/11 13:54, , 68F
08/11 13:54, 68F
→
08/11 14:19, , 69F
08/11 14:19, 69F
推
08/11 14:21, , 70F
08/11 14:21, 70F
→
08/11 15:35, , 71F
08/11 15:35, 71F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):
討論
35
71