Re: [討論] 為什麼中信不給史總複數年約?
我覺得史總不錯啊
很多調度都有一定邏輯
也給一些人機會
只是有些人沒把握住
比如前幾天
保送朱育賢 抓郭永維
結果投手根本投不出好球
滿壘 對到弱棒
投不出好球
中職一軍耶
你說能怎麼辦
所以史總會不斷適應的
對一些年輕投手更加教導
其實他雖然是大聯盟級
但是其實對一些年輕人滿有耐心
也給機會讓他們成長
對於台灣職棒未來能出更多好手
我覺得搞不好一些好手會是史總帶出來的
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.236.184.169
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1502292987.A.3C1.html
→
08/09 23:38, , 1F
08/09 23:38, 1F
→
08/09 23:38, , 2F
08/09 23:38, 2F
推
08/09 23:39, , 3F
08/09 23:39, 3F
→
08/09 23:40, , 4F
08/09 23:40, 4F
→
08/09 23:40, , 5F
08/09 23:40, 5F
→
08/09 23:41, , 6F
08/09 23:41, 6F
→
08/09 23:41, , 7F
08/09 23:41, 7F
→
08/09 23:41, , 8F
08/09 23:41, 8F
推
08/09 23:42, , 9F
08/09 23:42, 9F
推
08/09 23:43, , 10F
08/09 23:43, 10F
→
08/09 23:44, , 11F
08/09 23:44, 11F
推
08/09 23:46, , 12F
08/09 23:46, 12F
→
08/09 23:48, , 13F
08/09 23:48, 13F
→
08/09 23:50, , 14F
08/09 23:50, 14F
→
08/09 23:50, , 15F
08/09 23:50, 15F
→
08/09 23:50, , 16F
08/09 23:50, 16F
→
08/09 23:51, , 17F
08/09 23:51, 17F
→
08/09 23:51, , 18F
08/09 23:51, 18F
→
08/09 23:52, , 19F
08/09 23:52, 19F
→
08/09 23:52, , 20F
08/09 23:52, 20F
→
08/09 23:53, , 21F
08/09 23:53, 21F
→
08/09 23:53, , 22F
08/09 23:53, 22F
推
08/09 23:54, , 23F
08/09 23:54, 23F
→
08/09 23:54, , 24F
08/09 23:54, 24F
推
08/09 23:55, , 25F
08/09 23:55, 25F
→
08/09 23:55, , 26F
08/09 23:55, 26F
→
08/09 23:55, , 27F
08/09 23:55, 27F
→
08/09 23:56, , 28F
08/09 23:56, 28F
→
08/09 23:58, , 29F
08/09 23:58, 29F
推
08/09 23:58, , 30F
08/09 23:58, 30F
推
08/09 23:58, , 31F
08/09 23:58, 31F
→
08/09 23:59, , 32F
08/09 23:59, 32F
→
08/10 00:00, , 33F
08/10 00:00, 33F
→
08/10 00:00, , 34F
08/10 00:00, 34F
→
08/10 00:01, , 35F
08/10 00:01, 35F
→
08/10 00:03, , 36F
08/10 00:03, 36F
→
08/10 00:03, , 37F
08/10 00:03, 37F
→
08/10 00:04, , 38F
08/10 00:04, 38F
→
08/10 00:05, , 39F
08/10 00:05, 39F
→
08/10 00:06, , 40F
08/10 00:06, 40F
→
08/10 00:07, , 41F
08/10 00:07, 41F
推
08/10 00:19, , 42F
08/10 00:19, 42F
→
08/10 00:21, , 43F
08/10 00:21, 43F
推
08/10 00:25, , 44F
08/10 00:25, 44F
→
08/10 00:25, , 45F
08/10 00:25, 45F
→
08/10 00:25, , 46F
08/10 00:25, 46F
→
08/10 00:25, , 47F
08/10 00:25, 47F
→
08/10 00:26, , 48F
08/10 00:26, 48F
→
08/10 00:28, , 49F
08/10 00:28, 49F
→
08/10 00:30, , 50F
08/10 00:30, 50F
→
08/10 00:31, , 51F
08/10 00:31, 51F
推
08/10 00:35, , 52F
08/10 00:35, 52F
推
08/10 00:36, , 53F
08/10 00:36, 53F
→
08/10 00:37, , 54F
08/10 00:37, 54F
→
08/10 00:39, , 55F
08/10 00:39, 55F
→
08/10 00:39, , 56F
08/10 00:39, 56F
推
08/10 00:41, , 57F
08/10 00:41, 57F
→
08/10 00:45, , 58F
08/10 00:45, 58F
→
08/10 00:48, , 59F
08/10 00:48, 59F
推
08/10 00:48, , 60F
08/10 00:48, 60F
→
08/10 00:49, , 61F
08/10 00:49, 61F
→
08/10 01:00, , 62F
08/10 01:00, 62F
推
08/10 01:08, , 63F
08/10 01:08, 63F
→
08/10 01:26, , 64F
08/10 01:26, 64F
→
08/10 01:38, , 65F
08/10 01:38, 65F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):
討論
46
108