Re: [討論] 大王和四爺,哪個比較值得選?
其實我覺得這問題應該改成 陳傑憲 跟 張閔勛 誰比較值得選
去年游擊控紅中 竟然放掉四爺 選了張閔勛 ....
這選擇 真的有點像重演了 放掉 高國輝 選了 鐵肺魚雷一樣
為什麼好像也沒人檢討 當初第一輪要選張閔勛的問題哩
沒選詹子賢 這件事情就算了 Lamigo可能不敢賭高中生或是外野很滿了
但是沒選陳傑憲 真的是令人滿意外 不過吱迷跟紅中應該都一樣 會說 不後悔
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.161.186.235
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1501863648.A.3AD.html
推
08/05 00:21, , 1F
08/05 00:21, 1F
→
08/05 00:21, , 2F
08/05 00:21, 2F
推
08/05 00:22, , 3F
08/05 00:22, 3F
→
08/05 00:22, , 4F
08/05 00:22, 4F
→
08/05 00:22, , 5F
08/05 00:22, 5F
推
08/05 00:22, , 6F
08/05 00:22, 6F
推
08/05 00:22, , 7F
08/05 00:22, 7F
→
08/05 00:22, , 8F
08/05 00:22, 8F
推
08/05 00:23, , 9F
08/05 00:23, 9F
推
08/05 00:23, , 10F
08/05 00:23, 10F
推
08/05 00:23, , 11F
08/05 00:23, 11F
→
08/05 00:23, , 12F
08/05 00:23, 12F
→
08/05 00:23, , 13F
08/05 00:23, 13F
噓
08/05 00:24, , 14F
08/05 00:24, 14F
推
08/05 00:24, , 15F
08/05 00:24, 15F
所以吱迷還是相信選閔丸不選四爺是藍天勇正確的選擇 那我們拭目以待吧
當初吱迷也是都說 選鐵肺魚雷 不選高國輝沒錯 想不到現在還是這麼嘴硬
※ 編輯: freeclouds (1.161.186.235), 08/05/2017 00:25:47
推
08/05 00:25, , 16F
08/05 00:25, 16F
推
08/05 00:25, , 17F
08/05 00:25, 17F
推
08/05 00:25, , 18F
08/05 00:25, 18F
推
08/05 00:25, , 19F
08/05 00:25, 19F
推
08/05 00:26, , 20F
08/05 00:26, 20F
推
08/05 00:26, , 21F
08/05 00:26, 21F
→
08/05 00:27, , 22F
08/05 00:27, 22F
→
08/05 00:27, , 23F
08/05 00:27, 23F
推
08/05 00:27, , 24F
08/05 00:27, 24F
→
08/05 00:27, , 25F
08/05 00:27, 25F
推
08/05 00:28, , 26F
08/05 00:28, 26F
→
08/05 00:28, , 27F
08/05 00:28, 27F
推
08/05 00:28, , 28F
08/05 00:28, 28F
噓
08/05 00:28, , 29F
08/05 00:28, 29F
推
08/05 00:28, , 30F
08/05 00:28, 30F
推
08/05 00:28, , 31F
08/05 00:28, 31F
推
08/05 00:29, , 32F
08/05 00:29, 32F
推
08/05 00:29, , 33F
08/05 00:29, 33F
推
08/05 00:29, , 34F
08/05 00:29, 34F
噓
08/05 00:29, , 35F
08/05 00:29, 35F
噓
08/05 00:29, , 36F
08/05 00:29, 36F
→
08/05 00:30, , 37F
08/05 00:30, 37F
推
08/05 00:30, , 38F
08/05 00:30, 38F
還有 122 則推文
還有 12 段內文
→
08/05 00:56, , 161F
08/05 00:56, 161F
推
08/05 00:57, , 162F
08/05 00:57, 162F
噓
08/05 00:57, , 163F
08/05 00:57, 163F
→
08/05 00:57, , 164F
08/05 00:57, 164F
→
08/05 00:57, , 165F
08/05 00:57, 165F
→
08/05 00:57, , 166F
08/05 00:57, 166F
噓
08/05 00:58, , 167F
08/05 00:58, 167F
→
08/05 00:58, , 168F
08/05 00:58, 168F
→
08/05 00:58, , 169F
08/05 00:58, 169F
噓
08/05 00:59, , 170F
08/05 00:59, 170F
→
08/05 00:59, , 171F
08/05 00:59, 171F
噓
08/05 00:59, , 172F
08/05 00:59, 172F
推
08/05 01:00, , 173F
08/05 01:00, 173F
→
08/05 01:00, , 174F
08/05 01:00, 174F
噓
08/05 01:01, , 175F
08/05 01:01, 175F
噓
08/05 01:02, , 176F
08/05 01:02, 176F
推
08/05 01:02, , 177F
08/05 01:02, 177F
噓
08/05 01:02, , 178F
08/05 01:02, 178F
噓
08/05 01:03, , 179F
08/05 01:03, 179F
噓
08/05 01:04, , 180F
08/05 01:04, 180F
推
08/05 01:04, , 181F
08/05 01:04, 181F
→
08/05 01:05, , 182F
08/05 01:05, 182F
噓
08/05 01:05, , 183F
08/05 01:05, 183F
推
08/05 01:08, , 184F
08/05 01:08, 184F
推
08/05 01:08, , 185F
08/05 01:08, 185F
噓
08/05 01:10, , 186F
08/05 01:10, 186F
噓
08/05 01:14, , 187F
08/05 01:14, 187F
噓
08/05 01:15, , 188F
08/05 01:15, 188F
噓
08/05 01:16, , 189F
08/05 01:16, 189F
噓
08/05 01:22, , 190F
08/05 01:22, 190F
噓
08/05 01:26, , 191F
08/05 01:26, 191F
噓
08/05 01:27, , 192F
08/05 01:27, 192F
→
08/05 01:28, , 193F
08/05 01:28, 193F
→
08/05 01:29, , 194F
08/05 01:29, 194F
噓
08/05 01:39, , 195F
08/05 01:39, 195F
噓
08/05 01:58, , 196F
08/05 01:58, 196F
噓
08/05 03:23, , 197F
08/05 03:23, 197F
噓
08/05 04:15, , 198F
08/05 04:15, 198F
噓
08/05 05:27, , 199F
08/05 05:27, 199F
噓
08/05 17:10, , 200F
08/05 17:10, 200F
討論串 (同標題文章)