[閒聊] 兄弟還是那個大咖保證先發的兄弟嗎?
去年西瓜時期
只要是薪水高的大咖 幾乎就是一軍先發保證
就算表現不好 還是有西瓜滿滿的信任
而一些努力的二軍球員就永遠能等大咖受傷的機會
結果今年太史公時代,只要在一軍打不好
不管你多大咖 通通就是實力說話
兄弟一軍的大咖再也不好混
兄弟是否已經進入看實力說話而不是看資歷的營運模式了?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.73.131.195
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1497015929.A.A19.html
推
06/09 21:45, , 1F
06/09 21:45, 1F
推
06/09 21:46, , 2F
06/09 21:46, 2F
推
06/09 21:46, , 3F
06/09 21:46, 3F
→
06/09 21:46, , 4F
06/09 21:46, 4F
→
06/09 21:46, , 5F
06/09 21:46, 5F
推
06/09 21:46, , 6F
06/09 21:46, 6F
推
06/09 21:46, , 7F
06/09 21:46, 7F
噓
06/09 21:47, , 8F
06/09 21:47, 8F
推
06/09 21:47, , 9F
06/09 21:47, 9F
推
06/09 21:47, , 10F
06/09 21:47, 10F
推
06/09 21:47, , 11F
06/09 21:47, 11F
推
06/09 21:47, , 12F
06/09 21:47, 12F
推
06/09 21:47, , 13F
06/09 21:47, 13F
推
06/09 21:47, , 14F
06/09 21:47, 14F
→
06/09 21:48, , 15F
06/09 21:48, 15F
→
06/09 21:48, , 16F
06/09 21:48, 16F
→
06/09 21:48, , 17F
06/09 21:48, 17F
→
06/09 21:49, , 18F
06/09 21:49, 18F
→
06/09 21:49, , 19F
06/09 21:49, 19F
推
06/09 21:49, , 20F
06/09 21:49, 20F
→
06/09 21:50, , 21F
06/09 21:50, 21F
推
06/09 21:50, , 22F
06/09 21:50, 22F
推
06/09 21:50, , 23F
06/09 21:50, 23F
→
06/09 21:51, , 24F
06/09 21:51, 24F
推
06/09 21:51, , 25F
06/09 21:51, 25F
→
06/09 21:51, , 26F
06/09 21:51, 26F
推
06/09 21:52, , 27F
06/09 21:52, 27F
噓
06/09 21:52, , 28F
06/09 21:52, 28F
推
06/09 21:53, , 29F
06/09 21:53, 29F
推
06/09 21:53, , 30F
06/09 21:53, 30F
噓
06/09 21:53, , 31F
06/09 21:53, 31F
推
06/09 21:53, , 32F
06/09 21:53, 32F
→
06/09 21:53, , 33F
06/09 21:53, 33F
推
06/09 21:54, , 34F
06/09 21:54, 34F
→
06/09 22:00, , 35F
06/09 22:00, 35F
→
06/09 22:01, , 36F
06/09 22:01, 36F
噓
06/09 22:01, , 37F
06/09 22:01, 37F
→
06/09 22:02, , 38F
06/09 22:02, 38F
推
06/09 22:05, , 39F
06/09 22:05, 39F
噓
06/09 22:07, , 40F
06/09 22:07, 40F
推
06/09 22:09, , 41F
06/09 22:09, 41F
→
06/09 22:09, , 42F
06/09 22:09, 42F
噓
06/09 22:10, , 43F
06/09 22:10, 43F
推
06/09 22:10, , 44F
06/09 22:10, 44F
→
06/09 22:12, , 45F
06/09 22:12, 45F
→
06/09 22:12, , 46F
06/09 22:12, 46F
推
06/09 22:14, , 47F
06/09 22:14, 47F
推
06/09 22:19, , 48F
06/09 22:19, 48F
→
06/09 22:19, , 49F
06/09 22:19, 49F
推
06/09 22:24, , 50F
06/09 22:24, 50F
推
06/09 22:25, , 51F
06/09 22:25, 51F
推
06/09 22:32, , 52F
06/09 22:32, 52F
→
06/09 22:33, , 53F
06/09 22:33, 53F
→
06/09 22:37, , 54F
06/09 22:37, 54F
推
06/09 22:43, , 55F
06/09 22:43, 55F
推
06/10 04:55, , 56F
06/10 04:55, 56F
推
06/10 05:36, , 57F
06/10 05:36, 57F
→
06/10 05:36, , 58F
06/10 05:36, 58F
→
06/10 05:37, , 59F
06/10 05:37, 59F
→
06/10 05:37, , 60F
06/10 05:37, 60F
→
06/10 05:38, , 61F
06/10 05:38, 61F
推
06/10 20:33, , 62F
06/10 20:33, 62F
推
06/10 23:20, , 63F
06/10 23:20, 63F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):