Re: [新聞] 羅德吞本季最長7連敗 教練批投手沒有職業水準
※ 引述《murray (無)》之銘言:
: 羅德吞本季最長7連敗 教練批投手沒有職業水準
: http://sports.ltn.com.tw/news/breakingnews/2070990
: 〔記者林子翔/綜合報導〕羅德今天在主場迎戰西武,投手群被對方敲了17支安打失掉8
: 分,讓羅德總教練伊東勤相當火大,直批隊上的投手不是職業等級。
: 旅日投手陳冠宇昨天前4局無失分,第5局遇到亂流掉3分,隨即被教練換下場;今天羅德
: 先發洋投史丹里奇(Jason Standridge)前2局沒失分,3局上掉3分,該局結束就被教練
: 換下場,羅德這場比賽最後以4:8輸球,吞下本季最長的7連敗。
: 羅德目前戰績9勝28敗,是聯盟唯一沒有10勝的隊伍,羅德投手防禦率上升至4.77,是全
: 日職12支球隊中最高,而團隊打擊率1成90也是唯一打擊率未破2成的球隊。
: 伊東勤賽後一度拒訪,隨後又指3分領先守不住,投手群真的不行,直批隊上的投手根本
: 不是職業水準,今天被敲了17支安打,即使隊上打線再怎麼差,投手這樣的表現讓人無法
: 忍耐。
: ==
: 皮甲! 皮甲!
其實我一直覺得很奇怪
像昨天陳冠宇是第五局掉三分
今天Standridge是第三局掉三分
然後都馬上被換
不管隊友有沒有雷投手 應該沒有哪個先發投手能這麼神都不掉分
一般QS是6局內失3分
光以數據來看陳冠宇和Standridge雖然都單局失三分 都算是SP每場正常能量釋放範圍內
該給的分數就要給 SP盡力多吃點局數才對
反觀今天則本第一局掉5分 可是後續守成7局
雖然光看數據掉5分不太理想
可是後面投到第七局而且把比數凍結 對球隊來說是正向的幫助
可是伊東勤完全沒這種思維
看不出來他到底瞭不瞭解先發投手的工作目標是啥
要照他這種一分都不能失的思維和不乾脆丟9個牛一人一局去吃掉一場比賽?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.174.240.172
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1495037484.A.659.html
※ 編輯: KKbiger (1.174.240.172), 05/18/2017 00:12:30
推
05/18 00:12, , 1F
05/18 00:12, 1F
→
05/18 00:13, , 2F
05/18 00:13, 2F
推
05/18 00:13, , 3F
05/18 00:13, 3F
推
05/18 00:14, , 4F
05/18 00:14, 4F
→
05/18 00:14, , 5F
05/18 00:14, 5F
→
05/18 00:16, , 6F
05/18 00:16, 6F
推
05/18 00:16, , 7F
05/18 00:16, 7F
推
05/18 00:18, , 8F
05/18 00:18, 8F
推
05/18 00:18, , 9F
05/18 00:18, 9F
推
05/18 00:19, , 10F
05/18 00:19, 10F
推
05/18 00:20, , 11F
05/18 00:20, 11F
→
05/18 00:20, , 12F
05/18 00:20, 12F
→
05/18 00:21, , 13F
05/18 00:21, 13F
推
05/18 00:21, , 14F
05/18 00:21, 14F
推
05/18 00:22, , 15F
05/18 00:22, 15F
推
05/18 00:23, , 16F
05/18 00:23, 16F
推
05/18 00:24, , 17F
05/18 00:24, 17F
→
05/18 00:24, , 18F
05/18 00:24, 18F
推
05/18 00:25, , 19F
05/18 00:25, 19F
→
05/18 00:27, , 20F
05/18 00:27, 20F
推
05/18 00:28, , 21F
05/18 00:28, 21F
推
05/18 00:31, , 22F
05/18 00:31, 22F
推
05/18 00:31, , 23F
05/18 00:31, 23F
推
05/18 00:33, , 24F
05/18 00:33, 24F
推
05/18 00:33, , 25F
05/18 00:33, 25F
推
05/18 00:37, , 26F
05/18 00:37, 26F
推
05/18 00:42, , 27F
05/18 00:42, 27F
推
05/18 00:42, , 28F
05/18 00:42, 28F
推
05/18 00:42, , 29F
05/18 00:42, 29F
推
05/18 00:43, , 30F
05/18 00:43, 30F
推
05/18 00:44, , 31F
05/18 00:44, 31F
推
05/18 00:45, , 32F
05/18 00:45, 32F
噓
05/18 00:46, , 33F
05/18 00:46, 33F
推
05/18 00:49, , 34F
05/18 00:49, 34F
→
05/18 00:51, , 35F
05/18 00:51, 35F
→
05/18 00:53, , 36F
05/18 00:53, 36F
推
05/18 00:53, , 37F
05/18 00:53, 37F
推
05/18 00:54, , 38F
05/18 00:54, 38F
→
05/18 00:54, , 39F
05/18 00:54, 39F
推
05/18 00:55, , 40F
05/18 00:55, 40F
推
05/18 00:55, , 41F
05/18 00:55, 41F
推
05/18 00:59, , 42F
05/18 00:59, 42F
→
05/18 01:00, , 43F
05/18 01:00, 43F
推
05/18 01:02, , 44F
05/18 01:02, 44F
推
05/18 01:02, , 45F
05/18 01:02, 45F
噓
05/18 01:03, , 46F
05/18 01:03, 46F
推
05/18 01:04, , 47F
05/18 01:04, 47F
→
05/18 01:05, , 48F
05/18 01:05, 48F
推
05/18 01:07, , 49F
05/18 01:07, 49F
推
05/18 01:07, , 50F
05/18 01:07, 50F
→
05/18 01:08, , 51F
05/18 01:08, 51F
→
05/18 01:08, , 52F
05/18 01:08, 52F
→
05/18 01:12, , 53F
05/18 01:12, 53F
推
05/18 01:12, , 54F
05/18 01:12, 54F
推
05/18 01:14, , 55F
05/18 01:14, 55F
→
05/18 01:15, , 56F
05/18 01:15, 56F
推
05/18 01:25, , 57F
05/18 01:25, 57F
推
05/18 01:29, , 58F
05/18 01:29, 58F
推
05/18 01:29, , 59F
05/18 01:29, 59F
→
05/18 01:29, , 60F
05/18 01:29, 60F
推
05/18 01:52, , 61F
05/18 01:52, 61F
→
05/18 01:54, , 62F
05/18 01:54, 62F
→
05/18 01:54, , 63F
05/18 01:54, 63F
→
05/18 02:04, , 64F
05/18 02:04, 64F
推
05/18 02:08, , 65F
05/18 02:08, 65F
推
05/18 02:10, , 66F
05/18 02:10, 66F
推
05/18 02:33, , 67F
05/18 02:33, 67F
噓
05/18 02:50, , 68F
05/18 02:50, 68F
推
05/18 03:19, , 69F
05/18 03:19, 69F
推
05/18 04:26, , 70F
05/18 04:26, 70F
推
05/18 05:49, , 71F
05/18 05:49, 71F
推
05/18 06:28, , 72F
05/18 06:28, 72F
推
05/18 06:40, , 73F
05/18 06:40, 73F
推
05/18 07:39, , 74F
05/18 07:39, 74F
→
05/18 08:38, , 75F
05/18 08:38, 75F
推
05/18 09:25, , 76F
05/18 09:25, 76F
推
05/18 09:43, , 77F
05/18 09:43, 77F
推
05/18 10:10, , 78F
05/18 10:10, 78F
推
05/18 10:32, , 79F
05/18 10:32, 79F
→
05/18 11:45, , 80F
05/18 11:45, 80F
→
05/18 15:54, , 81F
05/18 15:54, 81F
討論串 (同標題文章)