[討論] 是不是大環境變好了,老將才不想退休已回收
10-15年前 球隊前3高薪的明星球員
月薪大概20萬到30萬左右
張泰山 劉芙豪高國慶潘威倫 彭政閔周思齊林智勝 都經過這段低薪時期
現在就算是坐板凳的代打老將
月薪至少30萬以上
是不是因此
這些老將要死撐活撐也要打下去打到40歲不輕易退休當教練
選手跟教練的薪資差距太大了
反觀 馮勝賢陳瑞昌陳瑞振 在2007到2009很年輕30出頭就退休
就是因為他們當球員跟教練的薪水落差可能沒這麼大
所以就早點退休也沒差
這樣分析是否正確嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.228.120.23
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1490669504.A.FAC.html
推
03/28 10:52, , 1F
03/28 10:52, 1F
推
03/28 10:52, , 2F
03/28 10:52, 2F
推
03/28 10:52, , 3F
03/28 10:52, 3F
推
03/28 10:53, , 4F
03/28 10:53, 4F
推
03/28 10:53, , 5F
03/28 10:53, 5F
→
03/28 10:53, , 6F
03/28 10:53, 6F
推
03/28 10:53, , 7F
03/28 10:53, 7F
推
03/28 10:54, , 8F
03/28 10:54, 8F
推
03/28 10:54, , 9F
03/28 10:54, 9F
→
03/28 10:54, , 10F
03/28 10:54, 10F
→
03/28 10:54, , 11F
03/28 10:54, 11F
→
03/28 10:54, , 12F
03/28 10:54, 12F
推
03/28 10:55, , 13F
03/28 10:55, 13F
※ 編輯: sincostan (61.228.120.23), 03/28/2017 10:55:21
推
03/28 10:55, , 14F
03/28 10:55, 14F
→
03/28 10:55, , 15F
03/28 10:55, 15F
→
03/28 10:55, , 16F
03/28 10:55, 16F
推
03/28 10:55, , 17F
03/28 10:55, 17F
推
03/28 10:56, , 18F
03/28 10:56, 18F
→
03/28 10:56, , 19F
03/28 10:56, 19F
→
03/28 10:56, , 20F
03/28 10:56, 20F
→
03/28 10:56, , 21F
03/28 10:56, 21F
→
03/28 10:57, , 22F
03/28 10:57, 22F
→
03/28 10:58, , 23F
03/28 10:58, 23F
推
03/28 10:59, , 24F
03/28 10:59, 24F
→
03/28 11:00, , 25F
03/28 11:00, 25F
→
03/28 11:00, , 26F
03/28 11:00, 26F
→
03/28 11:00, , 27F
03/28 11:00, 27F
→
03/28 11:01, , 28F
03/28 11:01, 28F
→
03/28 11:02, , 29F
03/28 11:02, 29F
→
03/28 11:03, , 30F
03/28 11:03, 30F
推
03/28 11:09, , 31F
03/28 11:09, 31F
→
03/28 11:13, , 32F
03/28 11:13, 32F
推
03/28 11:16, , 33F
03/28 11:16, 33F
→
03/28 11:16, , 34F
03/28 11:16, 34F
→
03/28 11:33, , 35F
03/28 11:33, 35F
推
03/28 12:07, , 36F
03/28 12:07, 36F
→
03/28 12:08, , 37F
03/28 12:08, 37F
→
03/28 12:40, , 38F
03/28 12:40, 38F
噓
03/28 13:08, , 39F
03/28 13:08, 39F
推
03/28 16:17, , 40F
03/28 16:17, 40F
→
03/28 16:18, , 41F
03/28 16:18, 41F
推
03/28 21:13, , 42F
03/28 21:13, 42F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):