[討論] 如果lamigo有加入中華隊或許有機會贏嗎?已回收
我是喵迷不是吱迷 先說在先
這次打下來看起來中華隊打線不弱 但缺乏致命一擊?
固定先發都幾乎打滿全場 因為最強的打者都排在先發了
沒有較多好的代打可以替換
所以我們沒有像南韓金泰均代打轟2分砲
跟古巴艾維列斯(Guillermo Avilés)代打打回3分
就只能默默的等主將有所發揮 但就像林智勝或許受到前一場手傷影響
整場被KKK還是只能相信他 結果攻勢一直無法連貫
或能換林泓育或陳俊秀 至少有個其他機會?
(或者換亂打流陽耀勳 無生還上飄快速球搞不好打成全壘打? 誤)
投手部分
鞠躬郭都說了牛棚壓不住 是關鍵之一
所以中華隊唯一的closer陳鴻文 或許壓不住也得上 因為沒其他霸氣closer阿
若有霸氣陳禹勳 國際賽連續無失分持續中 加上突然來給南韓"時間停止"拐氣
或許就壓住攻勢了
有時候棒球就是一股氣勢
平手時刻攻擊時沒有率先突破領先
等到下局投球時氣勢轉換就很難壓制了
事後理性檢討 少了lamigo真的差滿多的?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 120.104.25.212
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1489121661.A.992.html
推
03/10 12:54, , 1F
03/10 12:54, 1F
噓
03/10 12:55, , 2F
03/10 12:55, 2F
→
03/10 12:55, , 3F
03/10 12:55, 3F
→
03/10 12:55, , 4F
03/10 12:55, 4F
推
03/10 12:55, , 5F
03/10 12:55, 5F
推
03/10 12:55, , 6F
03/10 12:55, 6F
推
03/10 12:55, , 7F
03/10 12:55, 7F
→
03/10 12:55, , 8F
03/10 12:55, 8F
→
03/10 12:56, , 9F
03/10 12:56, 9F
推
03/10 12:56, , 10F
03/10 12:56, 10F
推
03/10 12:56, , 11F
03/10 12:56, 11F
→
03/10 12:56, , 12F
03/10 12:56, 12F
推
03/10 12:56, , 13F
03/10 12:56, 13F
→
03/10 12:56, , 14F
03/10 12:56, 14F
→
03/10 12:56, , 15F
03/10 12:56, 15F
推
03/10 12:57, , 16F
03/10 12:57, 16F
→
03/10 12:57, , 17F
03/10 12:57, 17F
推
03/10 12:57, , 18F
03/10 12:57, 18F
推
03/10 12:57, , 19F
03/10 12:57, 19F
推
03/10 12:57, , 20F
03/10 12:57, 20F
→
03/10 12:57, , 21F
03/10 12:57, 21F
推
03/10 12:57, , 22F
03/10 12:57, 22F
推
03/10 12:57, , 23F
03/10 12:57, 23F
→
03/10 12:57, , 24F
03/10 12:57, 24F
推
03/10 12:57, , 25F
03/10 12:57, 25F
推
03/10 12:58, , 26F
03/10 12:58, 26F
推
03/10 12:58, , 27F
03/10 12:58, 27F
推
03/10 12:58, , 28F
03/10 12:58, 28F
→
03/10 12:58, , 29F
03/10 12:58, 29F
推
03/10 12:58, , 30F
03/10 12:58, 30F
→
03/10 12:58, , 31F
03/10 12:58, 31F
→
03/10 12:58, , 32F
03/10 12:58, 32F
推
03/10 12:58, , 33F
03/10 12:58, 33F
→
03/10 12:58, , 34F
03/10 12:58, 34F
→
03/10 12:58, , 35F
03/10 12:58, 35F
→
03/10 12:59, , 36F
03/10 12:59, 36F
→
03/10 12:59, , 37F
03/10 12:59, 37F
推
03/10 12:59, , 38F
03/10 12:59, 38F
推
03/10 12:59, , 39F
03/10 12:59, 39F
還有 106 則推文
→
03/10 13:24, , 146F
03/10 13:24, 146F
→
03/10 13:24, , 147F
03/10 13:24, 147F
推
03/10 13:25, , 148F
03/10 13:25, 148F
→
03/10 13:25, , 149F
03/10 13:25, 149F
→
03/10 13:25, , 150F
03/10 13:25, 150F
→
03/10 13:27, , 151F
03/10 13:27, 151F
→
03/10 13:28, , 152F
03/10 13:28, 152F
推
03/10 13:29, , 153F
03/10 13:29, 153F
→
03/10 13:30, , 154F
03/10 13:30, 154F
→
03/10 13:31, , 155F
03/10 13:31, 155F
推
03/10 13:31, , 156F
03/10 13:31, 156F
→
03/10 13:31, , 157F
03/10 13:31, 157F
推
03/10 13:31, , 158F
03/10 13:31, 158F
推
03/10 13:32, , 159F
03/10 13:32, 159F
推
03/10 13:32, , 160F
03/10 13:32, 160F
推
03/10 13:33, , 161F
03/10 13:33, 161F
推
03/10 13:33, , 162F
03/10 13:33, 162F
→
03/10 13:33, , 163F
03/10 13:33, 163F
推
03/10 13:35, , 164F
03/10 13:35, 164F
→
03/10 13:37, , 165F
03/10 13:37, 165F
推
03/10 13:45, , 166F
03/10 13:45, 166F
推
03/10 13:53, , 167F
03/10 13:53, 167F
推
03/10 13:59, , 168F
03/10 13:59, 168F
推
03/10 14:01, , 169F
03/10 14:01, 169F
→
03/10 14:02, , 170F
03/10 14:02, 170F
→
03/10 14:05, , 171F
03/10 14:05, 171F
→
03/10 14:06, , 172F
03/10 14:06, 172F
推
03/10 14:07, , 173F
03/10 14:07, 173F
→
03/10 14:18, , 174F
03/10 14:18, 174F
→
03/10 14:19, , 175F
03/10 14:19, 175F
推
03/10 14:25, , 176F
03/10 14:25, 176F
推
03/10 14:34, , 177F
03/10 14:34, 177F
推
03/10 14:35, , 178F
03/10 14:35, 178F
推
03/10 15:19, , 179F
03/10 15:19, 179F
推
03/10 16:23, , 180F
03/10 16:23, 180F
推
03/10 17:31, , 181F
03/10 17:31, 181F
推
03/10 18:46, , 182F
03/10 18:46, 182F
→
03/10 22:06, , 183F
03/10 22:06, 183F
推
03/11 02:09, , 184F
03/11 02:09, 184F
→
03/11 02:10, , 185F
03/11 02:10, 185F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):