[討論] 台灣是什麼時候從投手王國變質的??已回收
看板Baseball作者super1314159 (你有多久沒看台灣團體了?)時間7年前 (2017/03/09 22:56)推噓25(29推 4噓 26→)留言59則, 45人參與討論串1/4 (看更多)
以前台灣球員有在外多少闖出名聲的 幾乎都是投手
從早期的雙郭 憨雞
到後來的
大樹、殷仔、狂曹、小小郭、土地公、CC李、火球仁
打者就不說了
上過MLB的就三隻,而且都過的很掙扎
打國際賽時也是一樣
只能祈禱投手完投完封,因為打線老是便秘
然後撐到關門階段就等著領鍋貼,關鍵分總是拿不下來
曾幾何時
台灣的棒球突然變成
我已經不在乎我投手掉幾分了,反正我想辦法打更多分回來就好
這次WBC,還打下了比大聯盟打線更狂的分數
反觀新生代的投手
能養成一級先發少之又少、終結者總是比誰提的油少
難不成都是彈力球害的?
有沒有投手王國的台灣去哪兒了的八卦?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.255.82.21
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1489071378.A.4C9.html
推
03/09 22:56, , 1F
03/09 22:56, 1F
→
03/09 22:56, , 2F
03/09 22:56, 2F
→
03/09 22:57, , 3F
03/09 22:57, 3F
→
03/09 22:57, , 4F
03/09 22:57, 4F
推
03/09 22:57, , 5F
03/09 22:57, 5F
推
03/09 22:57, , 6F
03/09 22:57, 6F
推
03/09 22:57, , 7F
03/09 22:57, 7F
→
03/09 22:57, , 8F
03/09 22:57, 8F
→
03/09 22:57, , 9F
03/09 22:57, 9F
推
03/09 22:57, , 10F
03/09 22:57, 10F
→
03/09 22:57, , 11F
03/09 22:57, 11F
推
03/09 22:57, , 12F
03/09 22:57, 12F
→
03/09 22:57, , 13F
03/09 22:57, 13F
→
03/09 22:57, , 14F
03/09 22:57, 14F
推
03/09 22:57, , 15F
03/09 22:57, 15F
推
03/09 22:58, , 16F
03/09 22:58, 16F
→
03/09 22:58, , 17F
03/09 22:58, 17F
推
03/09 22:58, , 18F
03/09 22:58, 18F
噓
03/09 22:59, , 19F
03/09 22:59, 19F
→
03/09 23:00, , 20F
03/09 23:00, 20F
推
03/09 23:02, , 21F
03/09 23:02, 21F
推
03/09 23:03, , 22F
03/09 23:03, 22F
→
03/09 23:04, , 23F
03/09 23:04, 23F
→
03/09 23:05, , 24F
03/09 23:05, 24F
→
03/09 23:05, , 25F
03/09 23:05, 25F
→
03/09 23:06, , 26F
03/09 23:06, 26F
推
03/09 23:06, , 27F
03/09 23:06, 27F
噓
03/09 23:07, , 28F
03/09 23:07, 28F
推
03/09 23:09, , 29F
03/09 23:09, 29F
推
03/09 23:10, , 30F
03/09 23:10, 30F
→
03/09 23:11, , 31F
03/09 23:11, 31F
→
03/09 23:11, , 32F
03/09 23:11, 32F
推
03/09 23:11, , 33F
03/09 23:11, 33F
→
03/09 23:12, , 34F
03/09 23:12, 34F
→
03/09 23:12, , 35F
03/09 23:12, 35F
推
03/09 23:14, , 36F
03/09 23:14, 36F
推
03/09 23:15, , 37F
03/09 23:15, 37F
→
03/09 23:15, , 38F
03/09 23:15, 38F
推
03/09 23:18, , 39F
03/09 23:18, 39F
→
03/09 23:18, , 40F
03/09 23:18, 40F
→
03/09 23:18, , 41F
03/09 23:18, 41F
推
03/09 23:22, , 42F
03/09 23:22, 42F
→
03/09 23:24, , 43F
03/09 23:24, 43F
推
03/09 23:26, , 44F
03/09 23:26, 44F
推
03/09 23:28, , 45F
03/09 23:28, 45F
→
03/09 23:29, , 46F
03/09 23:29, 46F
→
03/09 23:30, , 47F
03/09 23:30, 47F
推
03/09 23:58, , 48F
03/09 23:58, 48F
噓
03/10 00:03, , 49F
03/10 00:03, 49F
推
03/10 00:07, , 50F
03/10 00:07, 50F
噓
03/10 00:12, , 51F
03/10 00:12, 51F
推
03/10 00:27, , 52F
03/10 00:27, 52F
→
03/10 00:27, , 53F
03/10 00:27, 53F
推
03/10 00:36, , 54F
03/10 00:36, 54F
推
03/10 00:36, , 55F
03/10 00:36, 55F
→
03/10 18:45, , 56F
03/10 18:45, 56F
推
03/10 18:45, , 57F
03/10 18:45, 57F
推
03/10 18:45, , 58F
03/10 18:45, 58F
推
03/10 19:05, , 59F
03/10 19:05, 59F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):