Re: [問題] 現在還有練球迷質疑「態度」是假議題嗎?已回收
※ 引述《deathsong (智瑟和鳴)》之銘言:
: 我上禮拜早就已經開噴這群中職聯隊的態度超級有問題(#1OH1g9Qt (Baseball))
: 一狗票練球迷在上禮拜是不知道是怎麼護航的
: 貼出來給大家見證世界奇觀 現在一個個都躲起來了
: 本周各種認證:
: 今天東哥:(七局下):不行吼...已經進入到七局了不要再漫不經心了
: (賽後講評):你要總教練給你機會 我想你要自己先給機會..態度要積極點..
: 今天鄧公:(賽後講評):確實尤其...好像日職的球隊好像更珍惜這個冬盟
: 專欄作家Ramos:冬盟/態度決定命運 中職應向日職看齊
: 警察廳總教練柳承安:中職聯隊球員態度若能再積極一點會更好。
: 日本鄉民:台湾の投手糞やん 試合捨てたな?(https://goo.gl/p4K3eN)
: 剛剛連常公跟琨瀚教練都認證了
: 請問還有練球迷認為中職聯隊態度有問題是假議題嗎?
: 還需要蒐集多少認證才要相信這隊根本把冬盟當冬令營玩?
中職的實力,早就給散漫的態度給
完掉了,不要說打全部的人,事實
就是如此,二軍態度散漫無法競爭上
一軍,一軍不怕有人搶他位子。
造成台灣長期小時了了的笑話
還不是靠小朋友賺名次
這樣的環境真的太爽了,很多人都
已經看不慣中職,場次比其他少了,還不注重基本功?護航嗆工奴?
冬盟直展現出中職真實的一面態度零,日韓或球評都在罵了,護航啥?
為了繃緊神經,讓下一屆冬盟更好
球團會冬盟後解約態度差或狂E的人嗎?
下屆一定展現出態度戰戰兢兢
還有球團派的人的模式也是大問題
-----
Sent from JPTT on my Samsung SM-N900.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.136.197.16
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1481424892.A.D6E.html
推
12/11 11:00, , 1F
12/11 11:00, 1F
→
12/11 11:00, , 2F
12/11 11:00, 2F
噓
12/11 11:01, , 3F
12/11 11:01, 3F
→
12/11 11:01, , 4F
12/11 11:01, 4F
→
12/11 11:01, , 5F
12/11 11:01, 5F
→
12/11 11:01, , 6F
12/11 11:01, 6F
→
12/11 11:03, , 7F
12/11 11:03, 7F
→
12/11 11:06, , 8F
12/11 11:06, 8F
推
12/11 11:12, , 9F
12/11 11:12, 9F
→
12/11 11:13, , 10F
12/11 11:13, 10F
推
12/11 11:16, , 11F
12/11 11:16, 11F
推
12/11 11:16, , 12F
12/11 11:16, 12F
推
12/11 11:18, , 13F
12/11 11:18, 13F
→
12/11 11:19, , 14F
12/11 11:19, 14F
→
12/11 11:20, , 15F
12/11 11:20, 15F
推
12/11 11:21, , 16F
12/11 11:21, 16F
→
12/11 11:22, , 17F
12/11 11:22, 17F
→
12/11 11:22, , 18F
12/11 11:22, 18F
推
12/11 11:23, , 19F
12/11 11:23, 19F
→
12/11 11:23, , 20F
12/11 11:23, 20F
推
12/11 11:24, , 21F
12/11 11:24, 21F
→
12/11 11:24, , 22F
12/11 11:24, 22F
噓
12/11 11:25, , 23F
12/11 11:25, 23F
→
12/11 11:25, , 24F
12/11 11:25, 24F
推
12/11 11:25, , 25F
12/11 11:25, 25F
→
12/11 11:26, , 26F
12/11 11:26, 26F
→
12/11 11:28, , 27F
12/11 11:28, 27F
推
12/11 11:28, , 28F
12/11 11:28, 28F
→
12/11 11:28, , 29F
12/11 11:28, 29F
噓
12/11 11:29, , 30F
12/11 11:29, 30F
推
12/11 11:34, , 31F
12/11 11:34, 31F
→
12/11 12:01, , 32F
12/11 12:01, 32F
推
12/11 12:13, , 33F
12/11 12:13, 33F
→
12/11 12:13, , 34F
12/11 12:13, 34F
噓
12/11 12:21, , 35F
12/11 12:21, 35F
→
12/11 12:22, , 36F
12/11 12:22, 36F
推
12/11 12:22, , 37F
12/11 12:22, 37F
→
12/11 12:23, , 38F
12/11 12:23, 38F
→
12/11 12:24, , 39F
12/11 12:24, 39F
→
12/11 12:29, , 40F
12/11 12:29, 40F
→
12/11 12:30, , 41F
12/11 12:30, 41F
推
12/11 12:54, , 42F
12/11 12:54, 42F
推
12/11 13:01, , 43F
12/11 13:01, 43F
→
12/11 13:01, , 44F
12/11 13:01, 44F
→
12/11 13:01, , 45F
12/11 13:01, 45F
→
12/11 13:01, , 46F
12/11 13:01, 46F
推
12/11 13:06, , 47F
12/11 13:06, 47F
→
12/11 13:09, , 48F
12/11 13:09, 48F
推
12/11 13:26, , 49F
12/11 13:26, 49F
噓
12/11 13:34, , 50F
12/11 13:34, 50F
推
12/11 13:54, , 51F
12/11 13:54, 51F
→
12/11 13:54, , 52F
12/11 13:54, 52F
推
12/11 14:18, , 53F
12/11 14:18, 53F
→
12/11 14:18, , 54F
12/11 14:18, 54F
推
12/11 16:35, , 55F
12/11 16:35, 55F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):