[閒聊] 大家覺得電視輔助判決有哪些缺失該改進?已回收
電視輔助判決從2014年9月開始正式上路
要感謝電視輔助判決之父紀華文
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUZEqbQPk1k
但是實施兩季又兩個月了,爭議還是不少
大家覺得有那些爭議需要探討?
個人認為
(1) 取消最多兩次的限制
(2) 除了好壞球,其他一律都可以看 (楊崇煇事件)
https://youtu.be/HKAGzVT5GsA
(3) 七局之後主審主動觀看,何謂主動? 標準要明訂
(4) 本壘防撞條款要修改
(5) 因為攝影機沒照到而無法判決的case不計挑站次數 (同時告知另一隊總教練)
(6) 其他
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.58.67.133
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1478086153.A.C6B.html
推
11/02 19:30, , 1F
11/02 19:30, 1F
推
11/02 19:30, , 2F
11/02 19:30, 2F
→
11/02 19:32, , 3F
11/02 19:32, 3F
推
11/02 19:32, , 4F
11/02 19:32, 4F
推
11/02 19:35, , 5F
11/02 19:35, 5F
推
11/02 19:36, , 6F
11/02 19:36, 6F
推
11/02 19:38, , 7F
11/02 19:38, 7F
→
11/02 19:38, , 8F
11/02 19:38, 8F
噓
11/02 19:40, , 9F
11/02 19:40, 9F
推
11/02 19:40, , 10F
11/02 19:40, 10F
推
11/02 19:41, , 11F
11/02 19:41, 11F
推
11/02 19:41, , 12F
11/02 19:41, 12F
→
11/02 19:41, , 13F
11/02 19:41, 13F
→
11/02 19:42, , 14F
11/02 19:42, 14F
→
11/02 19:42, , 15F
11/02 19:42, 15F
→
11/02 19:43, , 16F
11/02 19:43, 16F
→
11/02 19:43, , 17F
11/02 19:43, 17F
推
11/02 19:47, , 18F
11/02 19:47, 18F
→
11/02 19:47, , 19F
11/02 19:47, 19F
推
11/02 19:47, , 20F
11/02 19:47, 20F
推
11/02 19:48, , 21F
11/02 19:48, 21F
推
11/02 19:48, , 22F
11/02 19:48, 22F
推
11/02 19:48, , 23F
11/02 19:48, 23F
推
11/02 19:48, , 24F
11/02 19:48, 24F
→
11/02 19:48, , 25F
11/02 19:48, 25F
推
11/02 19:49, , 26F
11/02 19:49, 26F
→
11/02 19:49, , 27F
11/02 19:49, 27F
→
11/02 19:50, , 28F
11/02 19:50, 28F
→
11/02 19:51, , 29F
11/02 19:51, 29F
推
11/02 19:52, , 30F
11/02 19:52, 30F
推
11/02 19:54, , 31F
11/02 19:54, 31F
→
11/02 19:54, , 32F
11/02 19:54, 32F
推
11/02 19:55, , 33F
11/02 19:55, 33F
→
11/02 20:00, , 34F
11/02 20:00, 34F
推
11/02 20:11, , 35F
11/02 20:11, 35F
推
11/02 20:12, , 36F
11/02 20:12, 36F
推
11/02 20:16, , 37F
11/02 20:16, 37F
→
11/02 20:16, , 38F
11/02 20:16, 38F
推
11/02 20:17, , 39F
11/02 20:17, 39F
→
11/02 20:17, , 40F
11/02 20:17, 40F
推
11/02 20:29, , 41F
11/02 20:29, 41F
推
11/02 20:33, , 42F
11/02 20:33, 42F
噓
11/02 20:38, , 43F
11/02 20:38, 43F
推
11/02 20:39, , 44F
11/02 20:39, 44F
推
11/02 20:43, , 45F
11/02 20:43, 45F
推
11/02 20:51, , 46F
11/02 20:51, 46F
推
11/02 20:52, , 47F
11/02 20:52, 47F
推
11/02 21:33, , 48F
11/02 21:33, 48F
→
11/02 21:43, , 49F
11/02 21:43, 49F
→
11/02 21:57, , 50F
11/02 21:57, 50F
推
11/02 21:58, , 51F
11/02 21:58, 51F
→
11/02 21:58, , 52F
11/02 21:58, 52F
→
11/02 21:59, , 53F
11/02 21:59, 53F
→
11/02 21:59, , 54F
11/02 21:59, 54F
推
11/02 22:01, , 55F
11/02 22:01, 55F
→
11/02 22:01, , 56F
11/02 22:01, 56F
推
11/02 22:03, , 57F
11/02 22:03, 57F
→
11/02 22:03, , 58F
11/02 22:03, 58F
推
11/02 23:02, , 59F
11/02 23:02, 59F
推
11/02 23:18, , 60F
11/02 23:18, 60F
推
11/03 00:16, , 61F
11/03 00:16, 61F
→
11/03 00:16, , 62F
11/03 00:16, 62F
推
11/03 00:25, , 63F
11/03 00:25, 63F
→
11/03 00:25, , 64F
11/03 00:25, 64F
推
11/03 03:26, , 65F
11/03 03:26, 65F
推
11/03 09:31, , 66F
11/03 09:31, 66F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):