[討論] C.C Lee 回來能用kuo條款嗎?已回收
C.C Lee 回來不應該參加選秀吧
以他的成就
待過美日職一軍
也即將成為台灣目前唯一一個
打過
美日臺一軍的職業球員
還有8年前北京奧運浴血奮戰古巴
回來應該能引用KUO條款吧??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.10.37.58
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1477998438.A.B28.html
推
11/01 19:07, , 1F
11/01 19:07, 1F
推
11/01 19:07, , 2F
11/01 19:07, 2F
→
11/01 19:08, , 3F
11/01 19:08, 3F
推
11/01 19:08, , 4F
11/01 19:08, 4F
推
11/01 19:08, , 5F
11/01 19:08, 5F
推
11/01 19:09, , 6F
11/01 19:09, 6F
推
11/01 19:09, , 7F
11/01 19:09, 7F
→
11/01 19:09, , 8F
11/01 19:09, 8F
推
11/01 19:10, , 9F
11/01 19:10, 9F
推
11/01 19:10, , 10F
11/01 19:10, 10F
推
11/01 19:10, , 11F
11/01 19:10, 11F
推
11/01 19:10, , 12F
11/01 19:10, 12F
推
11/01 19:11, , 13F
11/01 19:11, 13F
推
11/01 19:11, , 14F
11/01 19:11, 14F
→
11/01 19:11, , 15F
11/01 19:11, 15F
→
11/01 19:11, , 16F
11/01 19:11, 16F
推
11/01 19:11, , 17F
11/01 19:11, 17F
推
11/01 19:11, , 18F
11/01 19:11, 18F
→
11/01 19:11, , 19F
11/01 19:11, 19F
推
11/01 19:12, , 20F
11/01 19:12, 20F
→
11/01 19:12, , 21F
11/01 19:12, 21F
推
11/01 19:13, , 22F
11/01 19:13, 22F
→
11/01 19:13, , 23F
11/01 19:13, 23F
→
11/01 19:13, , 24F
11/01 19:13, 24F
→
11/01 19:13, , 25F
11/01 19:13, 25F
推
11/01 19:14, , 26F
11/01 19:14, 26F
推
11/01 19:15, , 27F
11/01 19:15, 27F
推
11/01 19:16, , 28F
11/01 19:16, 28F
推
11/01 19:16, , 29F
11/01 19:16, 29F
→
11/01 19:16, , 30F
11/01 19:16, 30F
噓
11/01 19:16, , 31F
11/01 19:16, 31F
→
11/01 19:16, , 32F
11/01 19:16, 32F
推
11/01 19:17, , 33F
11/01 19:17, 33F
→
11/01 19:18, , 34F
11/01 19:18, 34F
推
11/01 19:18, , 35F
11/01 19:18, 35F
推
11/01 19:19, , 36F
11/01 19:19, 36F
→
11/01 19:19, , 37F
11/01 19:19, 37F
推
11/01 19:20, , 38F
11/01 19:20, 38F
→
11/01 19:20, , 39F
11/01 19:20, 39F
推
11/01 19:21, , 40F
11/01 19:21, 40F
推
11/01 19:22, , 41F
11/01 19:22, 41F
→
11/01 19:22, , 42F
11/01 19:22, 42F
→
11/01 19:23, , 43F
11/01 19:23, 43F
→
11/01 19:23, , 44F
11/01 19:23, 44F
推
11/01 19:25, , 45F
11/01 19:25, 45F
→
11/01 19:26, , 46F
11/01 19:26, 46F
→
11/01 19:27, , 47F
11/01 19:27, 47F
→
11/01 19:27, , 48F
11/01 19:27, 48F
→
11/01 19:28, , 49F
11/01 19:28, 49F
推
11/01 19:29, , 50F
11/01 19:29, 50F
→
11/01 19:30, , 51F
11/01 19:30, 51F
推
11/01 19:34, , 52F
11/01 19:34, 52F
→
11/01 19:34, , 53F
11/01 19:34, 53F
→
11/01 19:35, , 54F
11/01 19:35, 54F
推
11/01 19:38, , 55F
11/01 19:38, 55F
推
11/01 19:40, , 56F
11/01 19:40, 56F
→
11/01 19:40, , 57F
11/01 19:40, 57F
推
11/01 19:45, , 58F
11/01 19:45, 58F
推
11/01 19:50, , 59F
11/01 19:50, 59F
→
11/01 20:15, , 60F
11/01 20:15, 60F
→
11/01 20:22, , 61F
11/01 20:22, 61F
→
11/01 20:22, , 62F
11/01 20:22, 62F
推
11/01 20:25, , 63F
11/01 20:25, 63F
→
11/01 20:25, , 64F
11/01 20:25, 64F
→
11/01 20:27, , 65F
11/01 20:27, 65F
→
11/01 20:29, , 66F
11/01 20:29, 66F
→
11/01 20:29, , 67F
11/01 20:29, 67F
推
11/01 20:59, , 68F
11/01 20:59, 68F
推
11/01 21:22, , 69F
11/01 21:22, 69F
推
11/01 23:40, , 70F
11/01 23:40, 70F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):