[閒聊] 如何能證明桃猿這場有什麼特別的策略性已回收
前面一堆不知道哪一隊的球迷版友
似乎對桃猿這場比賽很質疑
可是我這樣看下來
尤其前面部分 投手真的投很好啊
打擊火力也是凶猛
我看到九局上小飛刀不穩的時候
我還以為這場大概輸了 兄弟要準備對午策略了
沒想到關掉轉播
回來才發現 原來兄弟又贏了!
這結果也是滿驚訝的
但我認為這場桃猿真的是滿盡全力的在打阿
連洪中都說 晉級希望渺茫
我自己前面有打一篇分析 可以參考
桃猿要進要接下來三場通通都屠牛 這個機率...........
總之如果那些版友沒有證據 又怎麼能質疑人家這場比賽的認真程度
我是這樣想拉
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.82.147.135
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1475854367.A.A27.html
推
10/07 23:33, , 1F
10/07 23:33, 1F
那就一分證據一分話阿 沒證據別亂說話阿 不是嗎@@
※ 編輯: jay251935 (111.82.147.135), 10/07/2016 23:34:14
推
10/07 23:33, , 2F
10/07 23:33, 2F
→
10/07 23:34, , 3F
10/07 23:34, 3F
→
10/07 23:34, , 4F
10/07 23:34, 4F
→
10/07 23:34, , 5F
10/07 23:34, 5F
推
10/07 23:34, , 6F
10/07 23:34, 6F
推
10/07 23:34, , 7F
10/07 23:34, 7F
→
10/07 23:35, , 8F
10/07 23:35, 8F
→
10/07 23:35, , 9F
10/07 23:35, 9F
推
10/07 23:35, , 10F
10/07 23:35, 10F
推
10/07 23:35, , 11F
10/07 23:35, 11F
推
10/07 23:35, , 12F
10/07 23:35, 12F
→
10/07 23:35, , 13F
10/07 23:35, 13F
推
10/07 23:36, , 14F
10/07 23:36, 14F
推
10/07 23:36, , 15F
10/07 23:36, 15F
推
10/07 23:36, , 16F
10/07 23:36, 16F
推
10/07 23:37, , 17F
10/07 23:37, 17F
→
10/07 23:37, , 18F
10/07 23:37, 18F
→
10/07 23:38, , 19F
10/07 23:38, 19F
推
10/07 23:38, , 20F
10/07 23:38, 20F
推
10/07 23:39, , 21F
10/07 23:39, 21F
推
10/07 23:41, , 22F
10/07 23:41, 22F
推
10/07 23:42, , 23F
10/07 23:42, 23F
→
10/07 23:44, , 24F
10/07 23:44, 24F
推
10/07 23:45, , 25F
10/07 23:45, 25F
→
10/07 23:45, , 26F
10/07 23:45, 26F
推
10/07 23:46, , 27F
10/07 23:46, 27F
→
10/07 23:46, , 28F
10/07 23:46, 28F
→
10/07 23:47, , 29F
10/07 23:47, 29F
→
10/07 23:47, , 30F
10/07 23:47, 30F
推
10/07 23:47, , 31F
10/07 23:47, 31F
→
10/07 23:47, , 32F
10/07 23:47, 32F
推
10/07 23:47, , 33F
10/07 23:47, 33F
→
10/07 23:48, , 34F
10/07 23:48, 34F
→
10/07 23:48, , 35F
10/07 23:48, 35F
推
10/07 23:50, , 36F
10/07 23:50, 36F
推
10/07 23:52, , 37F
10/07 23:52, 37F
推
10/07 23:59, , 38F
10/07 23:59, 38F
推
10/08 00:00, , 39F
10/08 00:00, 39F
→
10/08 00:00, , 40F
10/08 00:00, 40F
推
10/08 00:01, , 41F
10/08 00:01, 41F
→
10/08 00:10, , 42F
10/08 00:10, 42F
推
10/08 00:13, , 43F
10/08 00:13, 43F
推
10/08 00:14, , 44F
10/08 00:14, 44F
→
10/08 00:14, , 45F
10/08 00:14, 45F
→
10/08 00:14, , 46F
10/08 00:14, 46F
推
10/08 00:21, , 47F
10/08 00:21, 47F
→
10/08 00:21, , 48F
10/08 00:21, 48F
推
10/08 00:22, , 49F
10/08 00:22, 49F
推
10/08 00:42, , 50F
10/08 00:42, 50F
噓
10/08 00:44, , 51F
10/08 00:44, 51F
推
10/08 00:44, , 52F
10/08 00:44, 52F
→
10/08 00:44, , 53F
10/08 00:44, 53F
推
10/08 00:58, , 54F
10/08 00:58, 54F
推
10/08 00:58, , 55F
10/08 00:58, 55F
→
10/08 00:58, , 56F
10/08 00:58, 56F
→
10/08 00:59, , 57F
10/08 00:59, 57F
推
10/08 08:48, , 58F
10/08 08:48, 58F
噓
10/08 10:29, , 59F
10/08 10:29, 59F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):