[新聞] 球團抵制? 何卓飛:相信球團了解什麼對棒球好已回收
看板Baseball作者Wojnarowski (@WojVerticalNBA)時間7年前 (2016/10/02 12:40)推噓-92(11推 103噓 36→)留言150則, 128人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)
WBC/球團抵制? 何卓飛:相信球團了解什麼對棒球好
記者黃建霖/台北報導
體育署長何卓飛今前往職棒聯盟協商,針對總教練人選的認定以及考量做說明,爭取球團
和聯盟的支持,他表示,四球團會了解到為了棒球的發展,大家必須要團結一心,才會有
好的結果。
「一條龍的目的為何?就是為了讓選手得到最好的照顧,大家必須了解到選手和教練們才
是真正的核心,要完成這些需要棒協、需要聯盟、需要體育署,需要全國上下一起做。」
何卓飛針對一條龍議題做出如此回應。
另外他還表示,球團和聯盟大致上認同他說的價值和目的,但策略和手段還要再做更細節
的討論。
如果最後三方還是無法取得共識,聯盟和球團採取拒絕提供選手及教練的策略時,體育署
會如何應對?何卓飛說,相信職棒方面也了解如何才是對棒球發展最好的方式,也相信他
們不會做出這樣的決定。
https://goo.gl/z2CIjr
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 27.242.195.64
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1475383245.A.EC5.html
噓
10/02 12:41, , 1F
10/02 12:41, 1F
噓
10/02 12:41, , 2F
10/02 12:41, 2F
推
10/02 12:41, , 3F
10/02 12:41, 3F
噓
10/02 12:42, , 4F
10/02 12:42, 4F
噓
10/02 12:42, , 5F
10/02 12:42, 5F
噓
10/02 12:42, , 6F
10/02 12:42, 6F
→
10/02 12:42, , 7F
10/02 12:42, 7F
噓
10/02 12:42, , 8F
10/02 12:42, 8F
推
10/02 12:42, , 9F
10/02 12:42, 9F
噓
10/02 12:42, , 10F
10/02 12:42, 10F
→
10/02 12:42, , 11F
10/02 12:42, 11F
→
10/02 12:42, , 12F
10/02 12:42, 12F
推
10/02 12:42, , 13F
10/02 12:42, 13F
噓
10/02 12:42, , 14F
10/02 12:42, 14F
→
10/02 12:43, , 15F
10/02 12:43, 15F
噓
10/02 12:43, , 16F
10/02 12:43, 16F
噓
10/02 12:43, , 17F
10/02 12:43, 17F
噓
10/02 12:44, , 18F
10/02 12:44, 18F
推
10/02 12:44, , 19F
10/02 12:44, 19F
→
10/02 12:44, , 20F
10/02 12:44, 20F
噓
10/02 12:44, , 21F
10/02 12:44, 21F
噓
10/02 12:44, , 22F
10/02 12:44, 22F
噓
10/02 12:44, , 23F
10/02 12:44, 23F
噓
10/02 12:44, , 24F
10/02 12:44, 24F
噓
10/02 12:44, , 25F
10/02 12:44, 25F
噓
10/02 12:45, , 26F
10/02 12:45, 26F
→
10/02 12:45, , 27F
10/02 12:45, 27F
→
10/02 12:45, , 28F
10/02 12:45, 28F
噓
10/02 12:45, , 29F
10/02 12:45, 29F
→
10/02 12:45, , 30F
10/02 12:45, 30F
噓
10/02 12:45, , 31F
10/02 12:45, 31F
噓
10/02 12:45, , 32F
10/02 12:45, 32F
噓
10/02 12:45, , 33F
10/02 12:45, 33F
噓
10/02 12:45, , 34F
10/02 12:45, 34F
噓
10/02 12:45, , 35F
10/02 12:45, 35F
噓
10/02 12:45, , 36F
10/02 12:45, 36F
噓
10/02 12:45, , 37F
10/02 12:45, 37F
噓
10/02 12:46, , 38F
10/02 12:46, 38F
噓
10/02 12:46, , 39F
10/02 12:46, 39F
還有 71 則推文
→
10/02 13:26, , 111F
10/02 13:26, 111F
→
10/02 13:26, , 112F
10/02 13:26, 112F
噓
10/02 13:28, , 113F
10/02 13:28, 113F
→
10/02 13:28, , 114F
10/02 13:28, 114F
噓
10/02 13:30, , 115F
10/02 13:30, 115F
噓
10/02 13:32, , 116F
10/02 13:32, 116F
噓
10/02 13:32, , 117F
10/02 13:32, 117F
→
10/02 13:33, , 118F
10/02 13:33, 118F
→
10/02 13:33, , 119F
10/02 13:33, 119F
噓
10/02 13:33, , 120F
10/02 13:33, 120F
→
10/02 13:34, , 121F
10/02 13:34, 121F
→
10/02 13:36, , 122F
10/02 13:36, 122F
噓
10/02 13:37, , 123F
10/02 13:37, 123F
噓
10/02 13:37, , 124F
10/02 13:37, 124F
噓
10/02 13:38, , 125F
10/02 13:38, 125F
噓
10/02 13:39, , 126F
10/02 13:39, 126F
噓
10/02 13:41, , 127F
10/02 13:41, 127F
噓
10/02 13:43, , 128F
10/02 13:43, 128F
噓
10/02 13:43, , 129F
10/02 13:43, 129F
噓
10/02 13:48, , 130F
10/02 13:48, 130F
噓
10/02 13:52, , 131F
10/02 13:52, 131F
噓
10/02 13:54, , 132F
10/02 13:54, 132F
噓
10/02 13:56, , 133F
10/02 13:56, 133F
噓
10/02 13:58, , 134F
10/02 13:58, 134F
噓
10/02 14:00, , 135F
10/02 14:00, 135F
→
10/02 14:00, , 136F
10/02 14:00, 136F
噓
10/02 14:01, , 137F
10/02 14:01, 137F
噓
10/02 14:05, , 138F
10/02 14:05, 138F
噓
10/02 14:13, , 139F
10/02 14:13, 139F
噓
10/02 14:15, , 140F
10/02 14:15, 140F
噓
10/02 14:16, , 141F
10/02 14:16, 141F
噓
10/02 14:21, , 142F
10/02 14:21, 142F
噓
10/02 14:22, , 143F
10/02 14:22, 143F
噓
10/02 14:29, , 144F
10/02 14:29, 144F
噓
10/02 14:37, , 145F
10/02 14:37, 145F
噓
10/02 14:41, , 146F
10/02 14:41, 146F
噓
10/02 15:09, , 147F
10/02 15:09, 147F
噓
10/02 16:15, , 148F
10/02 16:15, 148F
噓
10/02 16:46, , 149F
10/02 16:46, 149F
噓
10/02 16:52, , 150F
10/02 16:52, 150F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):