[閒聊] 速差理論在上原身上很成功,為什麼不推已回收
上原每年鬼神成績,whip都控制在1以下,根本不需要速球,快速球才85-87mile在跑,搭
配超慢球速75-77mile的指叉球,而且指叉也沒有蔡仲南強,普通而已,這樣已經吃定MLB
打者吃死死了,
所以杜老的速差理論是有用的,只是中職投手不會用阿,為什麼不推廣呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.134.165.156
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1474474410.A.4B2.html
推
09/22 00:13, , 1F
09/22 00:13, 1F
推
09/22 00:13, , 2F
09/22 00:13, 2F
推
09/22 00:14, , 3F
09/22 00:14, 3F
推
09/22 00:14, , 4F
09/22 00:14, 4F
→
09/22 00:14, , 5F
09/22 00:14, 5F
→
09/22 00:14, , 6F
09/22 00:14, 6F
→
09/22 00:14, , 7F
09/22 00:14, 7F
推
09/22 00:15, , 8F
09/22 00:15, 8F
推
09/22 00:15, , 9F
09/22 00:15, 9F
→
09/22 00:15, , 10F
09/22 00:15, 10F
推
09/22 00:15, , 11F
09/22 00:15, 11F
→
09/22 00:16, , 12F
09/22 00:16, 12F
推
09/22 00:16, , 13F
09/22 00:16, 13F
推
09/22 00:16, , 14F
09/22 00:16, 14F
推
09/22 00:16, , 15F
09/22 00:16, 15F
→
09/22 00:16, , 16F
09/22 00:16, 16F
推
09/22 00:16, , 17F
09/22 00:16, 17F
→
09/22 00:16, , 18F
09/22 00:16, 18F
推
09/22 00:16, , 19F
09/22 00:16, 19F
→
09/22 00:17, , 20F
09/22 00:17, 20F
→
09/22 00:17, , 21F
09/22 00:17, 21F
噓
09/22 00:17, , 22F
09/22 00:17, 22F
→
09/22 00:18, , 23F
09/22 00:18, 23F
→
09/22 00:18, , 24F
09/22 00:18, 24F
推
09/22 00:18, , 25F
09/22 00:18, 25F
噓
09/22 00:18, , 26F
09/22 00:18, 26F
推
09/22 00:18, , 27F
09/22 00:18, 27F
→
09/22 00:18, , 28F
09/22 00:18, 28F
推
09/22 00:19, , 29F
09/22 00:19, 29F
→
09/22 00:19, , 30F
09/22 00:19, 30F
噓
09/22 00:19, , 31F
09/22 00:19, 31F
噓
09/22 00:19, , 32F
09/22 00:19, 32F
→
09/22 00:21, , 33F
09/22 00:21, 33F
推
09/22 00:22, , 34F
09/22 00:22, 34F
→
09/22 00:24, , 35F
09/22 00:24, 35F
推
09/22 00:24, , 36F
09/22 00:24, 36F
推
09/22 00:24, , 37F
09/22 00:24, 37F
推
09/22 00:26, , 38F
09/22 00:26, 38F
噓
09/22 00:26, , 39F
09/22 00:26, 39F
推
09/22 00:30, , 40F
09/22 00:30, 40F
推
09/22 00:30, , 41F
09/22 00:30, 41F
推
09/22 00:30, , 42F
09/22 00:30, 42F
→
09/22 00:32, , 43F
09/22 00:32, 43F
→
09/22 00:32, , 44F
09/22 00:32, 44F
→
09/22 00:33, , 45F
09/22 00:33, 45F
推
09/22 00:37, , 46F
09/22 00:37, 46F
噓
09/22 00:43, , 47F
09/22 00:43, 47F
推
09/22 00:48, , 48F
09/22 00:48, 48F
推
09/22 00:51, , 49F
09/22 00:51, 49F
推
09/22 00:53, , 50F
09/22 00:53, 50F
推
09/22 00:54, , 51F
09/22 00:54, 51F
推
09/22 01:04, , 52F
09/22 01:04, 52F
→
09/22 01:04, , 53F
09/22 01:04, 53F
噓
09/22 01:10, , 54F
09/22 01:10, 54F
→
09/22 01:11, , 55F
09/22 01:11, 55F
→
09/22 01:12, , 56F
09/22 01:12, 56F
推
09/22 01:13, , 57F
09/22 01:13, 57F
→
09/22 01:13, , 58F
09/22 01:13, 58F
推
09/22 01:27, , 59F
09/22 01:27, 59F
噓
09/22 01:52, , 60F
09/22 01:52, 60F
推
09/22 02:10, , 61F
09/22 02:10, 61F
→
09/22 02:10, , 62F
09/22 02:10, 62F
噓
09/22 02:30, , 63F
09/22 02:30, 63F
噓
09/22 03:56, , 64F
09/22 03:56, 64F
→
09/22 04:08, , 65F
09/22 04:08, 65F
→
09/22 04:09, , 66F
09/22 04:09, 66F
推
09/22 04:17, , 67F
09/22 04:17, 67F
推
09/22 06:53, , 68F
09/22 06:53, 68F
→
09/22 07:17, , 69F
09/22 07:17, 69F
推
09/22 07:40, , 70F
09/22 07:40, 70F
推
09/22 07:48, , 71F
09/22 07:48, 71F
推
09/22 08:14, , 72F
09/22 08:14, 72F
推
09/22 08:26, , 73F
09/22 08:26, 73F
→
09/22 08:40, , 74F
09/22 08:40, 74F
推
09/22 08:41, , 75F
09/22 08:41, 75F
→
09/22 09:59, , 76F
09/22 09:59, 76F
推
09/22 10:03, , 77F
09/22 10:03, 77F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):