[閒聊] 當年鋒哥若加入統一而不是La new會怎樣?已回收
鋒哥 純純正正的台南人 擁有3/4的西拉雅族血統
學生時期的少棒和青少棒都是在家鄉磨練
青棒才北上中華中學
在06年歸國 當時的La new拜墊底所賜 得以挑走鋒哥
但假若當時也有像小小郭那樣的特案 放棄選秀
勢必所有球隊都會瘋狂追求鋒哥
地緣+標哥牽線 鋒哥百分之兩萬會加入統一
統一有了鋒哥這位超級巨星 再加上原本就不錯的陣容
會不會不只三連霸? not3 not4 not5 not6....
就算戰績那些都不重要 光說人氣就好了
La new簽下鋒哥 漸成為聯盟人氣數一數二的熱門球隊
統一雖然連霸時期球迷也不少 但總被大家酸路人化 公務員隊 沒明星
鋒哥若在統一 這支球隊會不會搖身一變 成為熱門球隊呢?
La new沒鋒哥的話 只剩下勝石連線 球迷也不會變這麼多
搞不好也不會經營這麼久 畢竟是小資本球團 也不會有今天的Lamigo了
若當年鋒哥加入的是統一 而不是La new會怎樣?
聯盟版圖會大改寫嗎??
還有哪些球星有鋒哥這種能撼動球迷遷移的明星度啊?
--
二次元&三次元的籃球之神
http://imgur.com/dkSaSvJ





--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 203.69.196.1
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1473839189.A.C75.html
※ 編輯: ralph1120 (203.69.196.1), 09/14/2016 15:47:38
推
09/14 15:47, , 1F
09/14 15:47, 1F
推
09/14 15:47, , 2F
09/14 15:47, 2F
推
09/14 15:47, , 3F
09/14 15:47, 3F
推
09/14 15:47, , 4F
09/14 15:47, 4F
推
09/14 15:48, , 5F
09/14 15:48, 5F
推
09/14 15:48, , 6F
09/14 15:48, 6F
噓
09/14 15:48, , 7F
09/14 15:48, 7F
推
09/14 15:50, , 8F
09/14 15:50, 8F
推
09/14 15:51, , 9F
09/14 15:51, 9F
→
09/14 15:51, , 10F
09/14 15:51, 10F
推
09/14 15:51, , 11F
09/14 15:51, 11F
推
09/14 15:51, , 12F
09/14 15:51, 12F
→
09/14 15:52, , 13F
09/14 15:52, 13F
→
09/14 15:53, , 14F
09/14 15:53, 14F
噓
09/14 15:53, , 15F
09/14 15:53, 15F
噓
09/14 15:53, , 16F
09/14 15:53, 16F
推
09/14 15:53, , 17F
09/14 15:53, 17F
推
09/14 15:53, , 18F
09/14 15:53, 18F
推
09/14 15:54, , 19F
09/14 15:54, 19F
推
09/14 15:55, , 20F
09/14 15:55, 20F
推
09/14 15:55, , 21F
09/14 15:55, 21F
→
09/14 15:55, , 22F
09/14 15:55, 22F
推
09/14 15:56, , 23F
09/14 15:56, 23F
噓
09/14 15:57, , 24F
09/14 15:57, 24F
推
09/14 15:58, , 25F
09/14 15:58, 25F
推
09/14 16:01, , 26F
09/14 16:01, 26F
→
09/14 16:01, , 27F
09/14 16:01, 27F
推
09/14 16:02, , 28F
09/14 16:02, 28F
推
09/14 16:02, , 29F
09/14 16:02, 29F
推
09/14 16:03, , 30F
09/14 16:03, 30F
→
09/14 16:03, , 31F
09/14 16:03, 31F
推
09/14 16:04, , 32F
09/14 16:04, 32F
推
09/14 16:04, , 33F
09/14 16:04, 33F
推
09/14 16:05, , 34F
09/14 16:05, 34F
推
09/14 16:05, , 35F
09/14 16:05, 35F
推
09/14 16:07, , 36F
09/14 16:07, 36F
→
09/14 16:07, , 37F
09/14 16:07, 37F
→
09/14 16:07, , 38F
09/14 16:07, 38F
推
09/14 16:17, , 39F
09/14 16:17, 39F
→
09/14 16:17, , 40F
09/14 16:17, 40F
推
09/14 16:17, , 41F
09/14 16:17, 41F
→
09/14 16:18, , 42F
09/14 16:18, 42F
推
09/14 16:27, , 43F
09/14 16:27, 43F
噓
09/14 16:27, , 44F
09/14 16:27, 44F
→
09/14 16:29, , 45F
09/14 16:29, 45F
推
09/14 16:29, , 46F
09/14 16:29, 46F
推
09/14 16:35, , 47F
09/14 16:35, 47F
推
09/14 16:39, , 48F
09/14 16:39, 48F
噓
09/14 16:41, , 49F
09/14 16:41, 49F
推
09/14 16:51, , 50F
09/14 16:51, 50F
噓
09/14 16:52, , 51F
09/14 16:52, 51F
推
09/14 16:54, , 52F
09/14 16:54, 52F
推
09/14 16:55, , 53F
09/14 16:55, 53F
推
09/14 16:58, , 54F
09/14 16:58, 54F
噓
09/14 17:02, , 55F
09/14 17:02, 55F
噓
09/14 17:04, , 56F
09/14 17:04, 56F
推
09/14 17:39, , 57F
09/14 17:39, 57F
推
09/14 17:48, , 58F
09/14 17:48, 58F
推
09/14 17:54, , 59F
09/14 17:54, 59F
噓
09/14 17:56, , 60F
09/14 17:56, 60F
噓
09/14 17:57, , 61F
09/14 17:57, 61F
推
09/14 18:12, , 62F
09/14 18:12, 62F
推
09/14 18:13, , 63F
09/14 18:13, 63F
推
09/14 18:23, , 64F
09/14 18:23, 64F
推
09/14 18:27, , 65F
09/14 18:27, 65F
推
09/14 18:38, , 66F
09/14 18:38, 66F
→
09/14 19:01, , 67F
09/14 19:01, 67F
推
09/14 19:36, , 68F
09/14 19:36, 68F
推
09/14 20:45, , 69F
09/14 20:45, 69F
推
09/14 20:46, , 70F
09/14 20:46, 70F
推
09/14 20:50, , 71F
09/14 20:50, 71F
噓
09/14 21:07, , 72F
09/14 21:07, 72F
推
09/14 22:17, , 73F
09/14 22:17, 73F
→
09/14 22:18, , 74F
09/14 22:18, 74F
推
09/14 23:30, , 75F
09/14 23:30, 75F
推
09/15 00:49, , 76F
09/15 00:49, 76F
噓
09/15 02:12, , 77F
09/15 02:12, 77F
噓
09/15 07:56, , 78F
09/15 07:56, 78F
噓
09/15 08:24, , 79F
09/15 08:24, 79F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):