[新聞] 鋒哥外唯一52號球員 林旺衛:不會刻意換已回收
看板Baseball作者Wojnarowski (@WojVerticalNBA)時間9年前 (2016/09/09 10:35)推噓43(56推 13噓 37→)留言106則, 83人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)
陳金鋒之外,全中職僅存的「52號」球員林旺衛,在陳金鋒退休前夕,意外面臨是不是該
換個號碼的難題,他也表示目前用得好好的,不會刻意去換背號。
從陳金鋒確定在今年球季結束就將退休以來,背號退休就一直是討論話題,包括是否讓「
52」背號退休、僅在猿隊或中職四隊都退休、以什麼形式退休都是熱議焦點。
在台灣球迷心中,52號幾乎與陳金鋒畫上等號,球迷虧其他球員想要穿上這個背號,得要
八字夠重,才能扛得起這個背號,也確實有球員在選擇背號時,對52號心生畏懼。
目前另外三隊裡,中信兄弟體能教練朱偉銘使用52號,球員則是僅有林旺衛一人,而他表
示當時選用52號,只是因為較常使用的25號已經有人穿,想說顛倒順序變成52號,只是很
單純的想法,卻也因此撞上了球迷最有感覺的背號。
林旺衛表示,「不會刻意去換背號,目前也都用得好好的。」他也提到,國外球團退休背
號的情況不少,而與鋒哥畢竟不同球隊,若52號未在中職全面退休,目前沒有更換背號的
想法。
猿隊是否讓鋒哥的「52號」永久欠番?預計在9月18日的引退賽當天會有答案,副領隊浦
韋青先前曾暗示,會以符合社會大眾的期待去做安排,球迷不妨拭目以待。
http://goo.gl/CfaL2G
[新聞] 中職52號欠番? 秘書長:需其它3隊同意
[新聞] 陳金鋒引退 中華隊52號不會跟著退
棒協秘書長林宗成表示,中華隊的背號是全國共有,不屬於個人,所以52號不會引退。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.160.148.117
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1473388543.A.950.html
推
09/09 10:37, , 1F
09/09 10:37, 1F
→
09/09 10:37, , 2F
09/09 10:37, 2F
推
09/09 10:37, , 3F
09/09 10:37, 3F
推
09/09 10:37, , 4F
09/09 10:37, 4F
→
09/09 10:38, , 5F
09/09 10:38, 5F
→
09/09 10:38, , 6F
09/09 10:38, 6F
噓
09/09 10:39, , 7F
09/09 10:39, 7F
推
09/09 10:39, , 8F
09/09 10:39, 8F
推
09/09 10:39, , 9F
09/09 10:39, 9F
→
09/09 10:39, , 10F
09/09 10:39, 10F
→
09/09 10:40, , 11F
09/09 10:40, 11F
推
09/09 10:40, , 12F
09/09 10:40, 12F
→
09/09 10:40, , 13F
09/09 10:40, 13F
→
09/09 10:40, , 14F
09/09 10:40, 14F
推
09/09 10:42, , 15F
09/09 10:42, 15F
推
09/09 10:43, , 16F
09/09 10:43, 16F
噓
09/09 10:44, , 17F
09/09 10:44, 17F
推
09/09 10:44, , 18F
09/09 10:44, 18F
推
09/09 10:44, , 19F
09/09 10:44, 19F
→
09/09 10:44, , 20F
09/09 10:44, 20F
→
09/09 10:44, , 21F
09/09 10:44, 21F
噓
09/09 10:45, , 22F
09/09 10:45, 22F
推
09/09 10:46, , 23F
09/09 10:46, 23F
推
09/09 10:47, , 24F
09/09 10:47, 24F
推
09/09 10:52, , 25F
09/09 10:52, 25F
→
09/09 10:54, , 26F
09/09 10:54, 26F
推
09/09 10:54, , 27F
09/09 10:54, 27F
→
09/09 10:55, , 28F
09/09 10:55, 28F
推
09/09 10:59, , 29F
09/09 10:59, 29F
推
09/09 11:00, , 30F
09/09 11:00, 30F
→
09/09 11:00, , 31F
09/09 11:00, 31F
推
09/09 11:00, , 32F
09/09 11:00, 32F
→
09/09 11:00, , 33F
09/09 11:00, 33F
噓
09/09 11:01, , 34F
09/09 11:01, 34F
推
09/09 11:02, , 35F
09/09 11:02, 35F
→
09/09 11:03, , 36F
09/09 11:03, 36F
噓
09/09 11:04, , 37F
09/09 11:04, 37F
推
09/09 11:07, , 38F
09/09 11:07, 38F
推
09/09 11:07, , 39F
09/09 11:07, 39F
還有 27 則推文
→
09/09 12:16, , 67F
09/09 12:16, 67F
→
09/09 12:16, , 68F
09/09 12:16, 68F
推
09/09 12:20, , 69F
09/09 12:20, 69F
→
09/09 12:22, , 70F
09/09 12:22, 70F
推
09/09 12:23, , 71F
09/09 12:23, 71F
噓
09/09 12:29, , 72F
09/09 12:29, 72F
推
09/09 12:30, , 73F
09/09 12:30, 73F
推
09/09 12:36, , 74F
09/09 12:36, 74F
噓
09/09 12:41, , 75F
09/09 12:41, 75F
推
09/09 12:45, , 76F
09/09 12:45, 76F
推
09/09 12:45, , 77F
09/09 12:45, 77F
→
09/09 12:46, , 78F
09/09 12:46, 78F
推
09/09 12:49, , 79F
09/09 12:49, 79F
推
09/09 12:56, , 80F
09/09 12:56, 80F
→
09/09 12:56, , 81F
09/09 12:56, 81F
噓
09/09 12:57, , 82F
09/09 12:57, 82F
→
09/09 12:59, , 83F
09/09 12:59, 83F
→
09/09 13:01, , 84F
09/09 13:01, 84F
推
09/09 13:15, , 85F
09/09 13:15, 85F
推
09/09 13:20, , 86F
09/09 13:20, 86F
→
09/09 13:21, , 87F
09/09 13:21, 87F
推
09/09 13:22, , 88F
09/09 13:22, 88F
→
09/09 13:26, , 89F
09/09 13:26, 89F
推
09/09 14:33, , 90F
09/09 14:33, 90F
→
09/09 14:33, , 91F
09/09 14:33, 91F
推
09/09 14:49, , 92F
09/09 14:49, 92F
→
09/09 14:50, , 93F
09/09 14:50, 93F
→
09/09 14:50, , 94F
09/09 14:50, 94F
→
09/09 14:51, , 95F
09/09 14:51, 95F
推
09/09 15:24, , 96F
09/09 15:24, 96F
噓
09/09 15:26, , 97F
09/09 15:26, 97F
推
09/09 15:40, , 98F
09/09 15:40, 98F
推
09/09 15:40, , 99F
09/09 15:40, 99F
推
09/09 16:51, , 100F
09/09 16:51, 100F
推
09/09 17:25, , 101F
09/09 17:25, 101F
噓
09/09 17:53, , 102F
09/09 17:53, 102F
推
09/09 18:00, , 103F
09/09 18:00, 103F
→
09/09 19:46, , 104F
09/09 19:46, 104F
推
09/09 21:05, , 105F
09/09 21:05, 105F
推
09/10 01:44, , 106F
09/10 01:44, 106F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):