[新聞] 飛行距離有差 馮喬許:球又換了嗎?已回收
看板Baseball作者Wojnarowski (@WojVerticalNBA)時間9年前 (2016/09/09 02:08)推噓45(50推 5噓 21→)留言76則, 66人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)
中華職棒/飛行距離有差 馮喬許:球又換了嗎?
中華職棒今年用球恢復係數都在標準值0.540-0.580合格數值範圍,聯盟也重新檢測了2次
,不過比較起從8月27日陽耀勳擊出全壘打的比賽後,中職每場比賽平均開轟數,從原本
的每場平均2.5轟降至每場平均2轟,這也讓義大犀牛打擊教練馮喬許笑說:「球有換嗎?
」
馮喬許認為,今年有很多全壘打都是他看過覺得不可思議的,更不用說陽耀勳那球開轟。
不過最近幾場比賽,全壘打狀況似乎略減,飛行距離也有點差距,讓他也覺得有點好奇,
「球是不是換了?」
馮喬許說出目前他所觀察到的,「原本上半季會變成全壘打的球,這幾場好像都沒有看到
。」
馮喬許認為,若是換球,對一些具有長打能力的打者影響不大,但對部分中長距離打者,
或是投手,一定多少會受到影響。
不過他也肯定若有「微調」,這也是對投手來說一大福音,「牛棚起碼不會燒得這麼兇。
」
另外,本季中職打者目前有王柏融、林泓育、蔣智賢打擊率都超過4成以上,這也讓他覺
得「中職打者實在太厲害。」
http://goo.gl/tVC4r9
換了又換?!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.160.148.117
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1473358085.A.19A.html
※ 編輯: Wojnarowski (118.160.148.117), 09/09/2016 02:09:03
推
09/09 02:09, , 1F
09/09 02:09, 1F
推
09/09 02:09, , 2F
09/09 02:09, 2F
推
09/09 02:10, , 3F
09/09 02:10, 3F
推
09/09 02:11, , 4F
09/09 02:11, 4F
推
09/09 02:11, , 5F
09/09 02:11, 5F
推
09/09 02:11, , 6F
09/09 02:11, 6F
噓
09/09 02:12, , 7F
09/09 02:12, 7F
→
09/09 02:12, , 8F
09/09 02:12, 8F
推
09/09 02:13, , 9F
09/09 02:13, 9F
→
09/09 02:15, , 10F
09/09 02:15, 10F
推
09/09 02:16, , 11F
09/09 02:16, 11F
噓
09/09 02:16, , 12F
09/09 02:16, 12F
→
09/09 02:16, , 13F
09/09 02:16, 13F
推
09/09 02:16, , 14F
09/09 02:16, 14F
→
09/09 02:18, , 15F
09/09 02:18, 15F
推
09/09 02:22, , 16F
09/09 02:22, 16F
推
09/09 02:24, , 17F
09/09 02:24, 17F
→
09/09 02:36, , 18F
09/09 02:36, 18F
推
09/09 02:37, , 19F
09/09 02:37, 19F
→
09/09 02:55, , 20F
09/09 02:55, 20F
推
09/09 03:09, , 21F
09/09 03:09, 21F
→
09/09 03:12, , 22F
09/09 03:12, 22F
推
09/09 03:14, , 23F
09/09 03:14, 23F
推
09/09 03:17, , 24F
09/09 03:17, 24F
→
09/09 03:59, , 25F
09/09 03:59, 25F
推
09/09 04:11, , 26F
09/09 04:11, 26F
→
09/09 04:20, , 27F
09/09 04:20, 27F
推
09/09 04:21, , 28F
09/09 04:21, 28F

推
09/09 05:29, , 29F
09/09 05:29, 29F
推
09/09 05:38, , 30F
09/09 05:38, 30F
推
09/09 05:59, , 31F
09/09 05:59, 31F
推
09/09 06:27, , 32F
09/09 06:27, 32F
→
09/09 06:48, , 33F
09/09 06:48, 33F
推
09/09 06:50, , 34F
09/09 06:50, 34F
推
09/09 07:04, , 35F
09/09 07:04, 35F
→
09/09 07:07, , 36F
09/09 07:07, 36F
噓
09/09 07:43, , 37F
09/09 07:43, 37F
推
09/09 07:46, , 38F
09/09 07:46, 38F
推
09/09 07:48, , 39F
09/09 07:48, 39F
噓
09/09 07:55, , 40F
09/09 07:55, 40F
推
09/09 07:57, , 41F
09/09 07:57, 41F
推
09/09 08:05, , 42F
09/09 08:05, 42F
推
09/09 08:15, , 43F
09/09 08:15, 43F
推
09/09 08:15, , 44F
09/09 08:15, 44F
推
09/09 08:17, , 45F
09/09 08:17, 45F
推
09/09 08:18, , 46F
09/09 08:18, 46F
→
09/09 08:18, , 47F
09/09 08:18, 47F
推
09/09 08:25, , 48F
09/09 08:25, 48F
推
09/09 08:29, , 49F
09/09 08:29, 49F
→
09/09 08:33, , 50F
09/09 08:33, 50F
推
09/09 08:36, , 51F
09/09 08:36, 51F
推
09/09 08:38, , 52F
09/09 08:38, 52F
推
09/09 08:45, , 53F
09/09 08:45, 53F
噓
09/09 08:52, , 54F
09/09 08:52, 54F
→
09/09 08:52, , 55F
09/09 08:52, 55F
推
09/09 08:52, , 56F
09/09 08:52, 56F
→
09/09 09:07, , 57F
09/09 09:07, 57F
→
09/09 09:09, , 58F
09/09 09:09, 58F
推
09/09 09:24, , 59F
09/09 09:24, 59F
推
09/09 09:35, , 60F
09/09 09:35, 60F
推
09/09 09:36, , 61F
09/09 09:36, 61F
→
09/09 09:37, , 62F
09/09 09:37, 62F
→
09/09 09:37, , 63F
09/09 09:37, 63F
推
09/09 09:40, , 64F
09/09 09:40, 64F
推
09/09 10:49, , 65F
09/09 10:49, 65F
推
09/09 10:51, , 66F
09/09 10:51, 66F
推
09/09 10:52, , 67F
09/09 10:52, 67F
→
09/09 10:53, , 68F
09/09 10:53, 68F
推
09/09 11:00, , 69F
09/09 11:00, 69F
推
09/09 11:12, , 70F
09/09 11:12, 70F
→
09/09 11:26, , 71F
09/09 11:26, 71F
推
09/09 11:31, , 72F
09/09 11:31, 72F
推
09/09 11:44, , 73F
09/09 11:44, 73F
→
09/09 12:21, , 74F
09/09 12:21, 74F
推
09/09 12:24, , 75F
09/09 12:24, 75F
推
09/09 15:21, , 76F
09/09 15:21, 76F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):