[討論] 為什麼台灣的企業不太喜歡玩球隊?消失
如題,感覺台灣的企業不太喜歡職業運動
業餘的話似乎會比較有意願,像是富邦國泰
感覺國外就很多老闆想要進場
之前快艇前老闆種族歧視
就一堆企業或合資放消息要買
台灣就算棒球的風氣好點了
也不太有人想玩
除非像是中職辜這種愛棒球又有實權的
經典賽後說有兩個企業想進 後來也不了了之
相對之下台灣玩職業應該不算太貴
可是還是不熱烈
或寧願選擇業餘跟掛名贊助
有什麼關鍵的原因嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.73.239.135
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1454377239.A.8F0.html
推
02/02 09:41, , 1F
02/02 09:41, 1F
→
02/02 09:41, , 2F
02/02 09:41, 2F
推
02/02 09:42, , 3F
02/02 09:42, 3F
→
02/02 09:42, , 4F
02/02 09:42, 4F
→
02/02 09:42, , 5F
02/02 09:42, 5F
→
02/02 09:43, , 6F
02/02 09:43, 6F
→
02/02 09:43, , 7F
02/02 09:43, 7F
推
02/02 09:46, , 8F
02/02 09:46, 8F
噓
02/02 09:50, , 9F
02/02 09:50, 9F
推
02/02 09:51, , 10F
02/02 09:51, 10F
推
02/02 09:51, , 11F
02/02 09:51, 11F
→
02/02 09:53, , 12F
02/02 09:53, 12F
噓
02/02 09:56, , 13F
02/02 09:56, 13F
推
02/02 09:56, , 14F
02/02 09:56, 14F
推
02/02 09:57, , 15F
02/02 09:57, 15F
推
02/02 09:58, , 16F
02/02 09:58, 16F
我到SBL很多年後才知道他不是職業聯盟
→
02/02 10:00, , 17F
02/02 10:00, 17F
→
02/02 10:01, , 18F
02/02 10:01, 18F
推
02/02 10:01, , 19F
02/02 10:01, 19F
→
02/02 10:01, , 20F
02/02 10:01, 20F
推
02/02 10:02, , 21F
02/02 10:02, 21F
→
02/02 10:03, , 22F
02/02 10:03, 22F
推
02/02 10:04, , 23F
02/02 10:04, 23F
推
02/02 10:06, , 24F
02/02 10:06, 24F
推
02/02 10:06, , 25F
02/02 10:06, 25F
→
02/02 10:06, , 26F
02/02 10:06, 26F
噓
02/02 10:06, , 27F
02/02 10:06, 27F
→
02/02 10:07, , 28F
02/02 10:07, 28F
推
02/02 10:09, , 29F
02/02 10:09, 29F
→
02/02 10:11, , 30F
02/02 10:11, 30F
推
02/02 10:11, , 31F
02/02 10:11, 31F
→
02/02 10:12, , 32F
02/02 10:12, 32F
推
02/02 10:13, , 33F
02/02 10:13, 33F
→
02/02 10:13, , 34F
02/02 10:13, 34F
推
02/02 10:13, , 35F
02/02 10:13, 35F
噓
02/02 10:15, , 36F
02/02 10:15, 36F
→
02/02 10:15, , 37F
02/02 10:15, 37F
→
02/02 10:16, , 38F
02/02 10:16, 38F
還有 25 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
02/02 10:35, , 64F
02/02 10:35, 64F
※ 編輯: sinon2mayday (42.73.239.135), 02/02/2016 10:38:56
推
02/02 10:38, , 65F
02/02 10:38, 65F
噓
02/02 10:38, , 66F
02/02 10:38, 66F
→
02/02 10:38, , 67F
02/02 10:38, 67F
推
02/02 10:40, , 68F
02/02 10:40, 68F
推
02/02 10:49, , 69F
02/02 10:49, 69F
→
02/02 10:50, , 70F
02/02 10:50, 70F
→
02/02 10:51, , 71F
02/02 10:51, 71F
推
02/02 10:52, , 72F
02/02 10:52, 72F
推
02/02 10:57, , 73F
02/02 10:57, 73F
推
02/02 11:02, , 74F
02/02 11:02, 74F
推
02/02 11:03, , 75F
02/02 11:03, 75F
→
02/02 11:03, , 76F
02/02 11:03, 76F
推
02/02 11:03, , 77F
02/02 11:03, 77F
→
02/02 11:04, , 78F
02/02 11:04, 78F
→
02/02 11:05, , 79F
02/02 11:05, 79F
→
02/02 11:05, , 80F
02/02 11:05, 80F
→
02/02 11:09, , 81F
02/02 11:09, 81F
→
02/02 11:12, , 82F
02/02 11:12, 82F
→
02/02 11:13, , 83F
02/02 11:13, 83F
推
02/02 11:14, , 84F
02/02 11:14, 84F
→
02/02 11:14, , 85F
02/02 11:14, 85F
推
02/02 11:14, , 86F
02/02 11:14, 86F
→
02/02 11:15, , 87F
02/02 11:15, 87F
→
02/02 11:15, , 88F
02/02 11:15, 88F
→
02/02 11:16, , 89F
02/02 11:16, 89F
→
02/02 11:16, , 90F
02/02 11:16, 90F
推
02/02 11:17, , 91F
02/02 11:17, 91F
→
02/02 11:17, , 92F
02/02 11:17, 92F
推
02/02 12:12, , 93F
02/02 12:12, 93F
→
02/02 12:12, , 94F
02/02 12:12, 94F
→
02/02 12:12, , 95F
02/02 12:12, 95F
→
02/02 12:13, , 96F
02/02 12:13, 96F
推
02/02 12:42, , 97F
02/02 12:42, 97F
推
02/02 13:07, , 98F
02/02 13:07, 98F
→
02/02 13:07, , 99F
02/02 13:07, 99F
噓
02/02 13:57, , 100F
02/02 13:57, 100F
噓
02/02 14:07, , 101F
02/02 14:07, 101F
噓
02/02 18:51, , 102F
02/02 18:51, 102F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):