Re: [討論] 有沒有人覺得突破僵局制還不錯的呢?消失
突破僵局制立意是好的
但奇怪的為啥是在無人出局一二壘有人開始打
連菜市場阿嬤都知道戰術是犧牲觸擊推進
如果成功 就換另一邊保送填壘抓DP
不斷的點點點+保送+換投手 到底是哪裡有省到時間
今天三局延長賽根本一樣戲碼兩邊不斷在比觸擊 不覺得很膩嗎
反正都要推進得點圈在打擊 我覺得到不如乾脆點從一出局滿壘開始打
投打直接正面對決 也好過在那點點點比誰觸擊比較厲害...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.140.133.104
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1447612845.A.848.html
推
11/16 02:41, , 1F
11/16 02:41, 1F
※ 編輯: luckysmallsu (223.140.133.104), 11/16/2015 02:45:43
推
11/16 02:42, , 2F
11/16 02:42, 2F
→
11/16 02:42, , 3F
11/16 02:42, 3F
→
11/16 02:43, , 4F
11/16 02:43, 4F
推
11/16 02:43, , 5F
11/16 02:43, 5F
→
11/16 02:44, , 6F
11/16 02:44, 6F
→
11/16 02:44, , 7F
11/16 02:44, 7F
→
11/16 02:45, , 8F
11/16 02:45, 8F
→
11/16 02:46, , 9F
11/16 02:46, 9F
→
11/16 02:46, , 10F
11/16 02:46, 10F
→
11/16 02:47, , 11F
11/16 02:47, 11F
→
11/16 02:48, , 12F
11/16 02:48, 12F
→
11/16 02:48, , 13F
11/16 02:48, 13F
→
11/16 02:54, , 14F
11/16 02:54, 14F
推
11/16 02:55, , 15F
11/16 02:55, 15F
推
11/16 02:58, , 16F
11/16 02:58, 16F
→
11/16 02:58, , 17F
11/16 02:58, 17F
→
11/16 02:58, , 18F
11/16 02:58, 18F
推
11/16 03:00, , 19F
11/16 03:00, 19F
推
11/16 03:05, , 20F
11/16 03:05, 20F
還有 11 則推文
還有 11 段內文
→
11/16 04:52, , 32F
11/16 04:52, 32F
→
11/16 04:52, , 33F
11/16 04:52, 33F
→
11/16 04:52, , 34F
11/16 04:52, 34F
推
11/16 07:43, , 35F
11/16 07:43, 35F
→
11/16 07:44, , 36F
11/16 07:44, 36F
→
11/16 07:44, , 37F
11/16 07:44, 37F
→
11/16 07:45, , 38F
11/16 07:45, 38F
噓
11/16 08:06, , 39F
11/16 08:06, 39F
噓
11/16 08:23, , 40F
11/16 08:23, 40F
推
11/16 08:31, , 41F
11/16 08:31, 41F
→
11/16 08:31, , 42F
11/16 08:31, 42F
→
11/16 08:44, , 43F
11/16 08:44, 43F
→
11/16 08:44, , 44F
11/16 08:44, 44F
→
11/16 08:47, , 45F
11/16 08:47, 45F
→
11/16 08:47, , 46F
11/16 08:47, 46F
→
11/16 08:47, , 47F
11/16 08:47, 47F
→
11/16 08:50, , 48F
11/16 08:50, 48F
→
11/16 08:50, , 49F
11/16 08:50, 49F
→
11/16 08:50, , 50F
11/16 08:50, 50F
推
11/16 09:08, , 51F
11/16 09:08, 51F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):