Re: [討論] 當年三番刀與三劍客誰比較強消失
※ 引述《wnglon (郎)》之銘言:
: 想起十幾年前職棒最熱門的話題是
: 三番刀與三劍客
: 三劍客因為在雅典奧運大放異采
: 而被象迷津津樂道 稱三劍客是台灣之光
: 三番刀因為在雅典奧運打不好而被狂酸
: 但當年興農獲得隊史第一座總冠軍
: 因為兄弟錯失四連霸 部份球迷開始反牛
: 反牛家族開始紛紛在奇摩家族建立
: 罵得內容不外呼當年例行賽最後一場的最後一球是壞球 不然兄弟就四連霸了
: 三番刀只會打國內不會打國外
: 台中球場需擴建
: 黃忠義上壘後愛摸LP
: 當年身為牛迷常為這件事很生氣
: 但現在想一想還滿懷念的
: 還是想討論當年三番刀與三劍客誰比較強?
撇開三劍客中有兩個黑掉的
當年三劍客的威脅性還是遠勝三番刀的
彭政閔就不多說了
現在被鄉民噓的要死的陳致遠當年也有將近砲的實力
蔡豐安雖然穩定度不如前兩位,但長打能力應該是三劍客中最強
而三番刀的話張泰山當然超強
黃忠義和鄭兆行的話雖然是不錯
但砲管頂多是長槍而已
對敵隊投手的威脅壓迫感還是不如陳致遠和蔡豐安
這大概也是當年2003年兄弟會贏興農的原因吧
不過後來三劍客有兩個黑掉了導致累計生涯成績不如三番刀
反倒是三番刀現在三個都有達成千安百盜
--
黑格爾:
人類從歷史上得到的教訓就是
人類永遠不會從歷史上得到任何教訓
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.193.2.84
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1442116612.A.9F0.html
※ 編輯: homebrian (123.193.2.84), 09/13/2015 11:59:16
→
09/13 11:57, , 1F
09/13 11:57, 1F
推
09/13 11:58, , 2F
09/13 11:58, 2F
推
09/13 11:58, , 3F
09/13 11:58, 3F
推
09/13 11:59, , 4F
09/13 11:59, 4F
推
09/13 11:59, , 5F
09/13 11:59, 5F
→
09/13 11:59, , 6F
09/13 11:59, 6F
→
09/13 12:00, , 7F
09/13 12:00, 7F
推
09/13 12:00, , 8F
09/13 12:00, 8F
→
09/13 12:00, , 9F
09/13 12:00, 9F
→
09/13 12:02, , 10F
09/13 12:02, 10F
推
09/13 12:02, , 11F
09/13 12:02, 11F
推
09/13 12:03, , 12F
09/13 12:03, 12F
→
09/13 12:04, , 13F
09/13 12:04, 13F
推
09/13 12:05, , 14F
09/13 12:05, 14F
推
09/13 12:05, , 15F
09/13 12:05, 15F
蔡豐安大概就是右手版的鄧志偉,有很強的長打能力但又不穩定
推
09/13 12:06, , 16F
09/13 12:06, 16F
推
09/13 12:06, , 17F
09/13 12:06, 17F
→
09/13 12:07, , 18F
09/13 12:07, 18F
→
09/13 12:07, , 19F
09/13 12:07, 19F
推
09/13 12:08, , 20F
09/13 12:08, 20F
→
09/13 12:08, , 21F
09/13 12:08, 21F
推
09/13 12:08, , 22F
09/13 12:08, 22F
推
09/13 12:08, , 23F
09/13 12:08, 23F
→
09/13 12:09, , 24F
09/13 12:09, 24F
推
09/13 12:09, , 25F
09/13 12:09, 25F
→
09/13 12:09, , 26F
09/13 12:09, 26F
推
09/13 12:10, , 27F
09/13 12:10, 27F
只可惜他不是台灣教練愛的那型,所以沒幾年就被砍掉了,但他弟現在卻還好好的在場上
推
09/13 12:10, , 28F
09/13 12:10, 28F
推
09/13 12:12, , 29F
09/13 12:12, 29F
→
09/13 12:12, , 30F
09/13 12:12, 30F
推
09/13 12:12, , 31F
09/13 12:12, 31F
→
09/13 12:12, , 32F
09/13 12:12, 32F
推
09/13 12:13, , 33F
09/13 12:13, 33F
跟現在四隊比當然輸慘,但在當年應該只比兄弟差一點
推
09/13 12:14, , 34F
09/13 12:14, 34F
推
09/13 12:14, , 35F
09/13 12:14, 35F
→
09/13 12:14, , 36F
09/13 12:14, 36F
還有 42 則推文
推
09/13 12:35, , 79F
09/13 12:35, 79F
推
09/13 12:35, , 80F
09/13 12:35, 80F
推
09/13 12:35, , 81F
09/13 12:35, 81F
→
09/13 12:36, , 82F
09/13 12:36, 82F
→
09/13 12:41, , 83F
09/13 12:41, 83F
沒錯啊,他當年可是有打出過二十幾幾轟
推
09/13 12:43, , 84F
09/13 12:43, 84F
推
09/13 12:43, , 85F
09/13 12:43, 85F
→
09/13 12:44, , 86F
09/13 12:44, 86F
推
09/13 12:50, , 87F
09/13 12:50, 87F
推
09/13 13:00, , 88F
09/13 13:00, 88F
→
09/13 13:01, , 89F
09/13 13:01, 89F
潘武雄喔,我是認為他不太可能達到彭政閔和林益全等級,他頂多就是長槍而已,不過他能養成長槍算是超乎預期,畢竟他一開始的評價連火哥都不如
推
09/13 13:02, , 90F
09/13 13:02, 90F
→
09/13 13:08, , 91F
09/13 13:08, 91F
→
09/13 13:08, , 92F
09/13 13:08, 92F
推
09/13 13:12, , 93F
09/13 13:12, 93F
推
09/13 13:14, , 94F
09/13 13:14, 94F
推
09/13 13:26, , 95F
09/13 13:26, 95F
推
09/13 13:30, , 96F
09/13 13:30, 96F
→
09/13 13:30, , 97F
09/13 13:30, 97F
→
09/13 13:31, , 98F
09/13 13:31, 98F
推
09/13 13:34, , 99F
09/13 13:34, 99F
推
09/13 13:36, , 100F
09/13 13:36, 100F
好像大家都把張泰山給忘了,泰山當年也打出像彭陳兩人一樣的成績,這樣應該有拉近兩組人馬的實力差距
→
09/13 13:36, , 101F
09/13 13:36, 101F
→
09/13 13:36, , 102F
09/13 13:36, 102F
推
09/13 13:40, , 103F
09/13 13:40, 103F
因為陳瑞振打擊不如鄭兆行,守備又不如鄭昌明,所底就變遺珠囉
→
09/13 13:40, , 104F
09/13 13:40, 104F
推
09/13 13:45, , 105F
09/13 13:45, 105F
推
09/13 13:50, , 106F
09/13 13:50, 106F
→
09/13 13:50, , 107F
09/13 13:50, 107F
興農這隊伍感覺一直不是很重視長打這一塊
※ 編輯: homebrian (123.193.2.84), 09/13/2015 14:15:11
推
09/13 14:45, , 108F
09/13 14:45, 108F
推
09/13 14:48, , 109F
09/13 14:48, 109F
就天生等級和天花板高度不是一級別,就像張泰山打再好也不會超越陳金鋒是一樣的意思
→
09/13 15:05, , 110F
09/13 15:05, 110F
推
09/13 15:40, , 111F
09/13 15:40, 111F
※ 編輯: homebrian (123.193.2.84), 09/13/2015 17:24:24
討論串 (同標題文章)