[問題] 為什麼棒球板要討論巨蛋,中職與巨蛋何關消失
為什麼棒球板到現在還不時要討論巨蛋
巨蛋蓋好,中職也租不起啊
頂多重大比賽,基於社會觀感,降租金讓你打個幾場
真的例行賽要租場地在巨蛋打,有幾個租的起而且又想砸錢租的
================================================================
我覺得真的要關心巨蛋的,應該是寬宏這種或是統包尾牙的公司吧
看看場地的動線規劃是否合宜,因為中職比賽破萬人是值得慶祝
但演場會,尾牙,法會,要破萬人是輕輕鬆鬆
未來應該也是藝(撈)文(錢)活動,會辦的比運動賽事多,看小巨蛋就知道
怎麼都沒聽說演藝活動或是尾牙公司去關心小巨蛋進度
反而都是棒球,護樹,政客,去關心巨蛋呢
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 203.73.73.169
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1424491065.A.2FA.html
噓
02/21 11:59, , 1F
02/21 11:59, 1F
噓
02/21 12:00, , 2F
02/21 12:00, 2F
→
02/21 12:00, , 3F
02/21 12:00, 3F
→
02/21 12:01, , 4F
02/21 12:01, 4F
→
02/21 12:02, , 5F
02/21 12:02, 5F
→
02/21 12:03, , 6F
02/21 12:03, 6F
噓
02/21 12:10, , 7F
02/21 12:10, 7F
噓
02/21 12:11, , 8F
02/21 12:11, 8F
噓
02/21 12:12, , 9F
02/21 12:12, 9F
就算有球隊包整季,也才使用60天(場),剩的305天要幹嘛
巨蛋可以打棒球無誤,但真要活化使用,不要變成蚊子館,棒球應該不是正解
※ 編輯: minnesota (203.73.73.169), 02/21/2015 12:16:18
推
02/21 12:14, , 10F
02/21 12:14, 10F
噓
02/21 12:16, , 11F
02/21 12:16, 11F
噓
02/21 12:20, , 12F
02/21 12:20, 12F
→
02/21 12:20, , 13F
02/21 12:20, 13F
→
02/21 12:21, , 14F
02/21 12:21, 14F
→
02/21 12:21, , 15F
02/21 12:21, 15F
→
02/21 12:21, , 16F
02/21 12:21, 16F
→
02/21 12:22, , 17F
02/21 12:22, 17F
→
02/21 12:22, , 18F
02/21 12:22, 18F
→
02/21 12:23, , 19F
02/21 12:23, 19F
→
02/21 12:25, , 20F
02/21 12:25, 20F
還有 26 則推文
還有 25 段內文
推
02/21 13:21, , 47F
02/21 13:21, 47F
噓
02/21 13:35, , 48F
02/21 13:35, 48F
噓
02/21 13:56, , 49F
02/21 13:56, 49F
噓
02/21 14:00, , 50F
02/21 14:00, 50F
噓
02/21 14:00, , 51F
02/21 14:00, 51F
噓
02/21 14:12, , 52F
02/21 14:12, 52F
噓
02/21 14:14, , 53F
02/21 14:14, 53F
噓
02/21 15:24, , 54F
02/21 15:24, 54F
→
02/21 15:25, , 55F
02/21 15:25, 55F
噓
02/21 15:51, , 56F
02/21 15:51, 56F
噓
02/21 16:06, , 57F
02/21 16:06, 57F
噓
02/21 16:14, , 58F
02/21 16:14, 58F
→
02/21 16:40, , 59F
02/21 16:40, 59F
噓
02/21 17:28, , 60F
02/21 17:28, 60F
噓
02/21 17:38, , 61F
02/21 17:38, 61F
噓
02/21 17:46, , 62F
02/21 17:46, 62F
→
02/21 18:21, , 63F
02/21 18:21, 63F
噓
02/21 19:45, , 64F
02/21 19:45, 64F
噓
02/21 20:50, , 65F
02/21 20:50, 65F
噓
02/22 00:05, , 66F
02/22 00:05, 66F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):