[問題] 行動支付到底有什麼好處????消失
最近同事一直在講說
人家大陸出門帶手機就夠了,根本不用錢包
台灣很落後!!!
行動支付到底對消費行有什麼好處?
你的薪水變高? 錢會變多嗎?
100元還是100元啊
講的好像100元用行動支付就可以變1000元
不用帶錢包,屁哩,你問問隨便一個大陸人
上次出差看他們還是都會有帶錢包呀
行動支付也只有局部區域普及,其它非都市
其實也都是用現金,哪有每個人都用手機支付
去年出差去上海的一家門市,想試一下支付寶
店員還不熟哩,很少人在用,又是媒體在炒作
哪有什麼大家都在用。
就像無卡提款,挖哩領個錢要輸入的資料
1、登入app,身份證號,網銀帳號,密碼
2. 操作提款功能
3. 再次輸入密碼確認提款
4. 產生代號,10分鐘內輸入atm
5. 輸入ATM,領錢
對啦,錢要從你的帳號拿出來,安全一點是重要的
不過拿卡插進去,一組密碼,錢不就領出來了
搞這些到底要幹嘛!!!!!!!
系統開發成本很高,有人真的在用無卡提款嗎?
一開始會用幾次玩看看,接下來,就拿卡片啊!
話說回來,如果台灣大家都用行動支付又怎麼樣?
22k還是22k,又不是會變33k
只很討厭人講什麼行動支付多好,結果也講不出好在哪?
突然想到,同事有Apple Pay,他也沒在用啊!!
自己都沒在用的,講哪些五四三的,跟名嘴差不多!
所以,到底好在哪裡??????????
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.228.183.5
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Bank_Service/M.1504791209.A.F01.html
推
09/07 21:36, , 1F
09/07 21:36, 1F
推
09/07 21:43, , 2F
09/07 21:43, 2F
→
09/07 21:45, , 3F
09/07 21:45, 3F
噓
09/07 21:45, , 4F
09/07 21:45, 4F
噓
09/07 21:45, , 5F
09/07 21:45, 5F
→
09/07 21:46, , 6F
09/07 21:46, 6F
噓
09/07 21:46, , 7F
09/07 21:46, 7F
→
09/07 21:46, , 8F
09/07 21:46, 8F
→
09/07 21:46, , 9F
09/07 21:46, 9F
→
09/07 21:47, , 10F
09/07 21:47, 10F
→
09/07 21:48, , 11F
09/07 21:48, 11F
推
09/07 21:48, , 12F
09/07 21:48, 12F
→
09/07 21:49, , 13F
09/07 21:49, 13F
→
09/07 21:49, , 14F
09/07 21:49, 14F
→
09/07 21:49, , 15F
09/07 21:49, 15F
→
09/07 21:49, , 16F
09/07 21:49, 16F
→
09/07 22:00, , 17F
09/07 22:00, 17F
推
09/07 22:04, , 18F
09/07 22:04, 18F
→
09/07 22:04, , 19F
09/07 22:04, 19F
→
09/07 22:05, , 20F
09/07 22:05, 20F
推
09/07 22:06, , 21F
09/07 22:06, 21F
→
09/07 22:06, , 22F
09/07 22:06, 22F
推
09/07 22:09, , 23F
09/07 22:09, 23F
→
09/07 22:09, , 24F
09/07 22:09, 24F
推
09/07 22:11, , 25F
09/07 22:11, 25F
→
09/07 22:11, , 26F
09/07 22:11, 26F
→
09/07 22:13, , 27F
09/07 22:13, 27F
→
09/07 22:13, , 28F
09/07 22:13, 28F
→
09/07 22:14, , 29F
09/07 22:14, 29F
→
09/07 22:15, , 30F
09/07 22:15, 30F
→
09/07 22:15, , 31F
09/07 22:15, 31F
→
09/07 22:16, , 32F
09/07 22:16, 32F
推
09/07 22:19, , 33F
09/07 22:19, 33F
→
09/07 22:20, , 34F
09/07 22:20, 34F
→
09/07 22:20, , 35F
09/07 22:20, 35F
→
09/07 22:42, , 36F
09/07 22:42, 36F
→
09/07 22:43, , 37F
09/07 22:43, 37F
→
09/07 22:44, , 38F
09/07 22:44, 38F
→
09/07 22:44, , 39F
09/07 22:44, 39F
噓
09/07 22:45, , 40F
09/07 22:45, 40F
→
09/07 22:45, , 41F
09/07 22:45, 41F
→
09/07 22:45, , 42F
09/07 22:45, 42F
→
09/07 22:46, , 43F
09/07 22:46, 43F
→
09/07 22:46, , 44F
09/07 22:46, 44F
→
09/07 22:47, , 45F
09/07 22:47, 45F
→
09/07 22:47, , 46F
09/07 22:47, 46F
→
09/07 22:47, , 47F
09/07 22:47, 47F
→
09/07 22:48, , 48F
09/07 22:48, 48F
噓
09/07 22:49, , 49F
09/07 22:49, 49F
→
09/07 22:50, , 50F
09/07 22:50, 50F
→
09/07 22:52, , 51F
09/07 22:52, 51F
推
09/07 22:55, , 52F
09/07 22:55, 52F
噓
09/07 23:13, , 53F
09/07 23:13, 53F
→
09/07 23:13, , 54F
09/07 23:13, 54F
→
09/07 23:13, , 55F
09/07 23:13, 55F
→
09/07 23:13, , 56F
09/07 23:13, 56F
→
09/07 23:43, , 57F
09/07 23:43, 57F
噓
09/07 23:51, , 58F
09/07 23:51, 58F
噓
09/07 23:56, , 59F
09/07 23:56, 59F
噓
09/07 23:57, , 60F
09/07 23:57, 60F
→
09/08 00:23, , 61F
09/08 00:23, 61F
噓
09/08 00:24, , 62F
09/08 00:24, 62F
噓
09/08 00:42, , 63F
09/08 00:42, 63F
推
09/08 03:38, , 64F
09/08 03:38, 64F
推
09/08 05:53, , 65F
09/08 05:53, 65F
→
09/08 05:53, , 66F
09/08 05:53, 66F
→
09/08 05:53, , 67F
09/08 05:53, 67F
噓
09/08 07:51, , 68F
09/08 07:51, 68F
推
09/08 08:20, , 69F
09/08 08:20, 69F
噓
09/08 10:02, , 70F
09/08 10:02, 70F
→
09/08 10:02, , 71F
09/08 10:02, 71F
→
09/08 10:04, , 72F
09/08 10:04, 72F
→
09/08 10:04, , 73F
09/08 10:04, 73F
噓
09/08 11:18, , 74F
09/08 11:18, 74F
噓
09/08 11:27, , 75F
09/08 11:27, 75F
噓
09/08 12:43, , 76F
09/08 12:43, 76F
→
09/08 12:56, , 77F
09/08 12:56, 77F
噓
09/08 14:15, , 78F
09/08 14:15, 78F
→
09/08 16:45, , 79F
09/08 16:45, 79F
→
09/08 16:45, , 80F
09/08 16:45, 80F
→
09/08 20:05, , 81F
09/08 20:05, 81F
噓
09/09 16:03, , 82F
09/09 16:03, 82F
推
09/09 20:54, , 83F
09/09 20:54, 83F
噓
09/10 12:43, , 84F
09/10 12:43, 84F
→
09/11 09:47, , 85F
09/11 09:47, 85F
推
09/11 13:47, , 86F
09/11 13:47, 86F
推
09/20 16:19, , 87F
09/20 16:19, 87F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):