[閒聊] 明天的麥可拿砲還是拿槍?
標題看不懂沒關係XD
因為是我故意下了奇怪的標題
總之我比較想關注的老兄
11TEX的M.拿波里
到底會拿砲還是拿槍
大家有啥見解嗎?
提供一點數據參考
11M.Napoli G 113 HR 30 AVG 0.320
09M.Napoli G 114 HR 20 AVG 0.272 力74 打66 黃
03J.Lopez G 129 HR 43 AVG 0.328 力87 打76 紫
力83 打72 紅
97雷騰 G 97 HR 27 AVG 0.350 力84 打76 紅
96T.韓德利 G 153 HR 41 AVG 0.259 力83 打66 紅
01M.皮亞薩 G 141 HR 36 AVG 0.300 力83 打70 紅
95M.皮亞薩 G 112 HR 32 AVG 0.346 力82 打74 紅
00M.皮亞薩 G 136 HR 38 AVG 0.324 力82 打73 紅
00C.強森 G 128 HR 31 AVG 0.304 力81 打72 紅
96T.史丹貝克 G 145 HR 35 AVG 0.272 力81 打76 紅
96B.聖地牙哥 G 136 HR 30 AVG 0.264 力79 打66 黃
96T.韓德利 G 132 HR 30 AVG 0.273 力79 打66 黃
同場加映打擊型但實際上尻了很多HR的
99I-ROD G 144 HR 35 AVG 0.332 力76 打86 紫
力73 打82 紅
97M.皮亞薩 G 152 HR 40 AVG 0.362 力78 打87 紫
力74 打83 紅
合理推測的話
95M.皮亞薩會是最接近今年的M.Napoli
但是當年皮亞薩打擊率可是高達0.34以上
Napoli雖然也高但是只有0.32
會不會因此意外失去紅卡很難說
但如果一切順利進行的話
今年出卡後的TEX就要無敵了
1~9棒全部可以排上砲了-3-+
推測數值 力81 打73
剩下的就看天了XD
紫卡的話應該不太可能= =
畢竟出賽場次跟其他紫卡C有一小段差距
紅卡應該會是最佳解
TEX AS:準備砸台了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.57.219.8
推
11/09 14:49, , 1F
11/09 14:49, 1F
推
11/09 14:50, , 2F
11/09 14:50, 2F
→
11/09 14:50, , 3F
11/09 14:50, 3F
→
11/09 14:50, , 4F
11/09 14:50, 4F
→
11/09 14:50, , 5F
11/09 14:50, 5F
推
11/09 14:51, , 6F
11/09 14:51, 6F
推
11/09 14:51, , 7F
11/09 14:51, 7F
推
11/09 14:52, , 8F
11/09 14:52, 8F
推
11/09 14:52, , 9F
11/09 14:52, 9F
推
11/09 14:52, , 10F
11/09 14:52, 10F
→
11/09 14:53, , 11F
11/09 14:53, 11F
→
11/09 14:53, , 12F
11/09 14:53, 12F
→
11/09 14:53, , 13F
11/09 14:53, 13F
推
11/09 14:54, , 14F
11/09 14:54, 14F
→
11/09 14:54, , 15F
11/09 14:54, 15F
推
11/09 14:54, , 16F
11/09 14:54, 16F
→
11/09 14:54, , 17F
11/09 14:54, 17F
→
11/09 14:55, , 18F
11/09 14:55, 18F
→
11/09 14:55, , 19F
11/09 14:55, 19F
→
11/09 14:55, , 20F
11/09 14:55, 20F
推
11/09 14:56, , 21F
11/09 14:56, 21F
→
11/09 14:56, , 22F
11/09 14:56, 22F
推
11/09 14:57, , 23F
11/09 14:57, 23F
推
11/09 14:58, , 24F
11/09 14:58, 24F
→
11/09 14:58, , 25F
11/09 14:58, 25F
推
11/09 14:59, , 26F
11/09 14:59, 26F
→
11/09 15:00, , 27F
11/09 15:00, 27F
推
11/09 15:02, , 28F
11/09 15:02, 28F
推
11/09 15:03, , 29F
11/09 15:03, 29F
→
11/09 15:03, , 30F
11/09 15:03, 30F
推
11/09 15:05, , 31F
11/09 15:05, 31F
推
11/09 15:07, , 32F
11/09 15:07, 32F
推
11/09 15:07, , 33F
11/09 15:07, 33F
→
11/09 15:08, , 34F
11/09 15:08, 34F
→
11/09 15:09, , 35F
11/09 15:09, 35F
→
11/09 15:09, , 36F
11/09 15:09, 36F
→
11/09 15:10, , 37F
11/09 15:10, 37F
→
11/09 15:10, , 38F
11/09 15:10, 38F
→
11/09 15:11, , 39F
11/09 15:11, 39F
推
11/09 15:11, , 40F
11/09 15:11, 40F
推
11/09 15:12, , 41F
11/09 15:12, 41F
→
11/09 15:12, , 42F
11/09 15:12, 42F
推
11/09 15:15, , 43F
11/09 15:15, 43F
推
11/09 15:16, , 44F
11/09 15:16, 44F
→
11/09 15:17, , 45F
11/09 15:17, 45F
→
11/09 15:19, , 46F
11/09 15:19, 46F
推
11/09 15:20, , 47F
11/09 15:20, 47F
→
11/09 15:20, , 48F
11/09 15:20, 48F
推
11/09 15:20, , 49F
11/09 15:20, 49F
推
11/09 15:22, , 50F
11/09 15:22, 50F
推
11/09 15:22, , 51F
11/09 15:22, 51F
→
11/09 15:23, , 52F
11/09 15:23, 52F
推
11/09 15:24, , 53F
11/09 15:24, 53F
→
11/09 15:24, , 54F
11/09 15:24, 54F
→
11/09 15:28, , 55F
11/09 15:28, 55F
→
11/09 15:38, , 56F
11/09 15:38, 56F
推
11/09 15:46, , 57F
11/09 15:46, 57F
→
11/09 15:46, , 58F
11/09 15:46, 58F
→
11/09 15:47, , 59F
11/09 15:47, 59F
推
11/09 16:03, , 60F
11/09 16:03, 60F
推
11/09 16:04, , 61F
11/09 16:04, 61F
→
11/09 16:07, , 62F
11/09 16:07, 62F
推
11/09 16:13, , 63F
11/09 16:13, 63F
推
11/09 16:24, , 64F
11/09 16:24, 64F
推
11/09 16:25, , 65F
11/09 16:25, 65F
→
11/09 16:25, , 66F
11/09 16:25, 66F
→
11/09 16:26, , 67F
11/09 16:26, 67F
→
11/09 16:26, , 68F
11/09 16:26, 68F
→
11/09 16:27, , 69F
11/09 16:27, 69F
推
11/09 16:27, , 70F
11/09 16:27, 70F
→
11/09 16:28, , 71F
11/09 16:28, 71F
→
11/09 16:28, , 72F
11/09 16:28, 72F
推
11/09 16:29, , 73F
11/09 16:29, 73F
→
11/09 16:32, , 74F
11/09 16:32, 74F
→
11/09 16:33, , 75F
11/09 16:33, 75F
推
11/09 16:49, , 76F
11/09 16:49, 76F
→
11/09 16:51, , 77F
11/09 16:51, 77F
推
11/09 17:14, , 78F
11/09 17:14, 78F
推
11/09 17:22, , 79F
11/09 17:22, 79F
推
11/09 19:03, , 80F
11/09 19:03, 80F