[建議] 博後集滿十年可以升助理教授大家覺得?
我發現學術界有些做了很久的博士後研究人員
大概50歲了還在做
有時候其實蠻替他們心疼 感覺應該也不是沒有能力 只是可能就是差了那麼一點運氣
就再也不可能被聘擔任教授了
我在想 如果博士後研究累積十年年資 加上30篇SCI 文章
可以直接轉成系上的助理教授
大家覺得這樣如何??
對於提升學術風氣有沒有幫助??
能否討論看看??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.231.188.125
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/AfterPhD/M.1488010172.A.789.html
※ 編輯: davidwales (36.231.188.125), 02/25/2017 16:12:51
推
02/25 16:13, , 1F
02/25 16:13, 1F
我看國外學術職缺就超多 而且一直在徵人
※ 編輯: davidwales (36.231.188.125), 02/25/2017 16:14:42
推
02/25 16:16, , 2F
02/25 16:16, 2F
→
02/25 16:17, , 3F
02/25 16:17, 3F
→
02/25 16:17, , 4F
02/25 16:17, 4F
噓
02/25 16:25, , 5F
02/25 16:25, 5F
30歲拿到學位, 10年也才40歲
※ 編輯: davidwales (36.231.188.125), 02/25/2017 16:26:48
推
02/25 16:56, , 6F
02/25 16:56, 6F
推
02/25 17:50, , 7F
02/25 17:50, 7F
→
02/25 17:50, , 8F
02/25 17:50, 8F
→
02/25 17:50, , 9F
02/25 17:50, 9F
→
02/25 17:50, , 10F
02/25 17:50, 10F
推
02/25 17:53, , 11F
02/25 17:53, 11F
→
02/25 18:10, , 12F
02/25 18:10, 12F
→
02/25 18:10, , 13F
02/25 18:10, 13F
推
02/25 19:05, , 14F
02/25 19:05, 14F
→
02/25 19:36, , 15F
02/25 19:36, 15F
→
02/25 20:22, , 16F
02/25 20:22, 16F
推
02/25 21:57, , 17F
02/25 21:57, 17F
→
02/25 21:58, , 18F
02/25 21:58, 18F
→
02/25 21:58, , 19F
02/25 21:58, 19F
→
02/26 00:20, , 20F
02/26 00:20, 20F
→
02/26 00:32, , 21F
02/26 00:32, 21F
推
02/26 01:07, , 22F
02/26 01:07, 22F
→
02/26 01:08, , 23F
02/26 01:08, 23F
→
02/26 01:09, , 24F
02/26 01:09, 24F
→
02/26 01:09, , 25F
02/26 01:09, 25F
推
02/26 01:12, , 26F
02/26 01:12, 26F
→
02/26 01:13, , 27F
02/26 01:13, 27F
推
02/26 01:15, , 28F
02/26 01:15, 28F
→
02/26 01:16, , 29F
02/26 01:16, 29F
→
02/26 01:16, , 30F
02/26 01:16, 30F
推
02/26 01:42, , 31F
02/26 01:42, 31F
→
02/26 01:55, , 32F
02/26 01:55, 32F
推
02/26 03:17, , 33F
02/26 03:17, 33F
推
02/26 03:36, , 34F
02/26 03:36, 34F
→
02/26 03:37, , 35F
02/26 03:37, 35F
→
02/26 03:38, , 36F
02/26 03:38, 36F
推
02/26 05:55, , 37F
02/26 05:55, 37F
→
02/26 05:56, , 38F
02/26 05:56, 38F
→
02/26 05:57, , 39F
02/26 05:57, 39F
→
02/26 05:58, , 40F
02/26 05:58, 40F
→
02/26 05:58, , 41F
02/26 05:58, 41F
噓
02/26 08:23, , 42F
02/26 08:23, 42F
推
02/26 13:38, , 43F
02/26 13:38, 43F
→
02/26 16:49, , 44F
02/26 16:49, 44F
推
02/26 22:42, , 45F
02/26 22:42, 45F
推
02/27 01:16, , 46F
02/27 01:16, 46F
→
02/27 01:16, , 47F
02/27 01:16, 47F
→
02/27 01:23, , 48F
02/27 01:23, 48F
推
02/27 02:27, , 49F
02/27 02:27, 49F
→
02/27 02:27, , 50F
02/27 02:27, 50F
→
02/27 04:35, , 51F
02/27 04:35, 51F
→
02/27 04:36, , 52F
02/27 04:36, 52F
→
02/27 04:50, , 53F
02/27 04:50, 53F
推
02/27 10:53, , 54F
02/27 10:53, 54F
→
02/27 10:53, , 55F
02/27 10:53, 55F
→
02/27 11:01, , 56F
02/27 11:01, 56F
→
02/27 11:01, , 57F
02/27 11:01, 57F
推
02/27 12:13, , 58F
02/27 12:13, 58F
→
02/27 12:53, , 59F
02/27 12:53, 59F
噓
02/27 13:32, , 60F
02/27 13:32, 60F
→
02/28 06:32, , 61F
02/28 06:32, 61F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):