Fw: [爆卦] 交大論文也造假了
※ [本文轉錄自 Gossiping 看板 #1OgPnFCb ]
作者: b1l3hlkff (有種被騙的感覺) 看板: Gossiping
標題: [爆卦] 交大論文也造假了
時間: Sun Feb 19 21:23:24 2017
交大終於姍姍來遲,加入頂尖Photoshop大學科系之列了
Pubpeer原文:https://goo.gl/I1RyxQ
論文原文:https://goo.gl/wFuMtO
作者群:http://i.imgur.com/08moOuO.png
補個掛,這個教授(通訊作者)之前計畫年度報告剽竊別人論文數據被
系上抓到,系上自己把他攆去上碩士班一年級要上的學術倫理課程,
去年六月上完拿到學術倫理修課證明。這應該是全交大,或是全台灣
第一個有上過學術倫理課程的教授吧。
然後前腳六月剛上完學術倫理,後腳七月就發這篇論文,嗯。
這種課程真的很有效。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.46.173.212
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1487510607.A.325.html
→
02/19 21:23, , 1F
02/19 21:23, 1F
→
02/19 21:23, , 2F
02/19 21:23, 2F
生物科技系
Department of Biological Science and Technology, National Chiao Tung
University
推
02/19 21:23, , 3F
02/19 21:23, 3F
推
02/19 21:24, , 4F
02/19 21:24, 4F
推
02/19 21:24, , 5F
02/19 21:24, 5F
→
02/19 21:24, , 6F
02/19 21:24, 6F
這可是楊大校長推薦的方式啊
→
02/19 21:24, , 7F
02/19 21:24, 7F
推
02/19 21:25, , 8F
02/19 21:25, 8F
→
02/19 21:25, , 9F
02/19 21:25, 9F
推
02/19 21:26, , 10F
02/19 21:26, 10F
→
02/19 21:26, , 11F
02/19 21:26, 11F
推
02/19 21:26, , 12F
02/19 21:26, 12F
→
02/19 21:28, , 13F
02/19 21:28, 13F
大意就是,你們實驗數據也太多不同組長得一模一樣,是不是剪貼的阿?
可以出示一下原始數據嗎?
阿你們原始數據怎麼標示的組別跟論文上的不一樣?
然後就沒有回應了。
→
02/19 21:28, , 14F
02/19 21:28, 14F
推
02/19 21:29, , 15F
02/19 21:29, 15F
推
02/19 21:29, , 16F
02/19 21:29, 16F
推
02/19 21:29, , 17F
02/19 21:29, 17F
推
02/19 21:30, , 18F
02/19 21:30, 18F
推
02/19 21:32, , 19F
02/19 21:32, 19F
推
02/19 21:33, , 20F
02/19 21:33, 20F
→
02/19 21:35, , 21F
02/19 21:35, 21F
推
02/19 21:36, , 22F
02/19 21:36, 22F
推
02/19 21:36, , 23F
02/19 21:36, 23F
→
02/19 21:38, , 24F
02/19 21:38, 24F
→
02/19 21:39, , 25F
02/19 21:39, 25F
→
02/19 21:39, , 26F
02/19 21:39, 26F
噓
02/19 21:41, , 27F
02/19 21:41, 27F
因為之前有個貨櫃屋做電子顯微鏡,所以輕敵了。
附帶一提那個造假博士生的也是被聘到生科系喔。
雖然新聞爆出來過半年就走了。
推
02/19 21:41, , 28F
02/19 21:41, 28F
推
02/19 21:42, , 29F
02/19 21:42, 29F
推
02/19 21:43, , 30F
02/19 21:43, 30F
推
02/19 21:43, , 31F
02/19 21:43, 31F
洩漏國家機密者,處一年以上七年以下有期徒刑。
推
02/19 21:44, , 32F
02/19 21:44, 32F
→
02/19 21:46, , 33F
02/19 21:46, 33F
還有 39 則推文
還有 2 段內文
推
02/19 22:36, , 73F
02/19 22:36, 73F
推
02/19 22:37, , 74F
02/19 22:37, 74F
推
02/19 22:38, , 75F
02/19 22:38, 75F
推
02/19 22:39, , 76F
02/19 22:39, 76F
推
02/19 22:40, , 77F
02/19 22:40, 77F
推
02/19 22:44, , 78F
02/19 22:44, 78F
推
02/19 22:45, , 79F
02/19 22:45, 79F
推
02/19 22:48, , 80F
02/19 22:48, 80F
推
02/19 22:50, , 81F
02/19 22:50, 81F
推
02/19 22:55, , 82F
02/19 22:55, 82F
推
02/19 22:55, , 83F
02/19 22:55, 83F
推
02/19 23:08, , 84F
02/19 23:08, 84F
被你一說我才注意到,前四個都是第一作者。
國衛院Jen-Kun Chen,陽明Shin-E Wang有人知道是誰嗎?
※ 編輯: b1l3hlkff (114.46.173.212), 02/19/2017 23:13:13
推
02/19 23:10, , 85F
02/19 23:10, 85F
推
02/19 23:11, , 86F
02/19 23:11, 86F
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
※ 轉錄者: smartken (1.171.59.131), 02/19/2017 23:13:26
推
02/19 23:22, , 87F
02/19 23:22, 87F
推
02/19 23:32, , 88F
02/19 23:32, 88F
→
02/19 23:32, , 89F
02/19 23:32, 89F
推
02/20 00:16, , 90F
02/20 00:16, 90F
推
02/20 00:18, , 91F
02/20 00:18, 91F
→
02/20 00:40, , 92F
02/20 00:40, 92F
推
02/20 07:03, , 93F
02/20 07:03, 93F
→
02/20 10:22, , 94F
02/20 10:22, 94F
推
02/20 12:53, , 95F
02/20 12:53, 95F
推
02/20 14:12, , 96F
02/20 14:12, 96F
推
02/20 15:36, , 97F
02/20 15:36, 97F
→
02/20 15:36, , 98F
02/20 15:36, 98F
推
02/20 19:37, , 99F
02/20 19:37, 99F
→
02/20 19:38, , 100F
02/20 19:38, 100F
推
02/20 20:02, , 101F
02/20 20:02, 101F
→
02/20 20:02, , 102F
02/20 20:02, 102F
推
02/20 20:07, , 103F
02/20 20:07, 103F
→
02/20 20:07, , 104F
02/20 20:07, 104F
推
02/20 20:10, , 105F
02/20 20:10, 105F
→
02/20 21:19, , 106F
02/20 21:19, 106F
推
02/21 09:40, , 107F
02/21 09:40, 107F
噓
02/25 10:42, , 108F
02/25 10:42, 108F
→
02/25 18:01, , 109F
02/25 18:01, 109F
→
02/26 00:18, , 110F
02/26 00:18, 110F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):