[新聞] If you don't want A-Rod, you're nuts
這篇文章實在太搞笑了,貼出來看看吧。
From: http://tinyurl.com/yw4ue8
If you don't want A-Rod, you're nuts
By Jim Caple
You're joking, right? You can't be serious. Sixty-one percent of you who
responded to our Page 2 poll on Tuesday wouldn't want baseball's best player
on your favorite team? You'd be disappointed if your team signed a
(soon-to-be) three-time MVP and Gold Glove winner who can play third base or
shortstop? You don't want a player who could become the all-time home run
king? If that's really true, I have another poll question for you:
Do you feel this way because your drug problem is that severe, or because the
American educational system is that bad? Or do you simply listen to too much
sports talk radio?
Look, I'm no A-Rod apologist. He's a diva, and a bigger phony than most team
owners. But you know what? That doesn't matter. Did Lou Gehrig and Babe Ruth
get along? Was Ted Williams considered a "winner"? Did every teammate like
Reggie Jackson? Does Manny Ramirez even know what team he plays for? Baseball
is the most individual of sports, and all that really matters is what a guy
does on the field. And what A-Rod has done is average 124 runs scored, 45
home runs and 128 RBIs per season the past 10 years.
I mean, just how big an ass would a player have to be for you to honestly
say, "No, sorry, I really don't want the offensive equivalent of Babe Ruth in
my lineup?"
And don't give me that crap about how A-Rod would upset your club's precious
chemistry. I keep reading all these comments praising the great "chemistry"
and "teamwork" of the Boston Red Sox. Please. As if the Rockies and Indians
somehow had flaws in their character, or were bad teammates simply because
they didn't beat the Sox. So the Rockies won 21 of 22 games, and then got
swept in the World Series because their bottle of "chemistry" ran out?
Nonsense. The Red Sox didn't win it all because their character was somehow
superior to every other team's. They won because they had more talent. They
won because they had better players, better pitching, and they played the
best in October.
It's wonderful if every teammate is like Mike Lowell or Jason Varitek, but
it's hardly necessary as long as a player produces. For crying out loud, Curt
Schilling's ego is so monstrous it's an official stop on the Boston duck boat
tour, while Manny has repeatedly asked to be traded. Talent matters, not
personality. Chuck Knoblauch was as moody a player as there ever was, yet the
Twins won a World Series and the Yankees won three straight with him in the
lineup. Jack Morris was as self-involved a player as I've ever covered, and
he was a cornerstone for three different World Series champs.
If New England fans need an example of how a player with excess baggage can
perform with a new team, look at how Randy Moss has flourished with the
Patriots this season -- in a sport that requires much more teamwork than
baseball.
And it's not like Rodriguez is a troublemaker or a bad guy. Granted, taking
his shirt off in Central Park on a sunny summer day was pretty scandalous
(the nerve of that guy!). But seriously, c'mon! At worst A-Rod is like the
office know-it-all who wants you to know how cool his 72-inch plasma screen
looks, and how well his fantasy team is doing, and where all the cool
restaurants are. But he also happens to really know his stuff, and he's able
to hack into any system and write code that really, really works. You may not
want to sit next to him, but you definitely want him in your office.
I understand people worrying that signing A-Rod would preclude their team
from obtaining other necessary players. But that's a needless concern.
Signing someone like A-Rod, Derek Jeter or Manny Ramirez to a contract for
$20 million to $25 million per year isn't what hurts a team financially. It's
signing the likes of Jeff Weaver for $8 million and Richie Sexson for $15
million, then trading for Horacio Ramirez and his $2 million salary (not that
I have any particular team in mind). As Bill Veeck once said, "It isn't the
high price of stars that is expensive; it's the high price of mediocrity." In
that sense, signing A-Rod might help financially, because you'll be less
likely to waste your money on some stiff who won't produce (hello, Adrian
Beltre).
Have teams gotten better after A-Rod left? Well, that depends on how you look
at it. We all took great delight trumpeting that "fact" when the Mariners
sported the best regular-season record in American League history the year
after A-Rod signed with Texas. But the Mariners haven't been to the
postseason since that 2001 season, finishing in last place three times. So
who would Mariners fans honestly rather have at third base now? A-Rod or
Adrian Beltre? Or at shortstop: A-Rod or Yuniesky Betancourt?
While it was fun booing and laughing at A-Rod during that incredible 2001
season, just remember, the Mariners went equally deep in the postseason in
2000 (one game further, actually) and they wouldn't have made the playoffs
that year if it hadn't been for A-Rod's hitting .316 with a .420 on-base
percentage, 41 home runs, 134 runs scored and 132 RBIs. (By the way, A-Rod
also hit .371 with two home runs and seven RBIs in that postseason).
And while the Rangers did improve to 89-73 the season after they traded
A-Rod, they haven't had a winning record since and landed right back in last
place this year.
As for A-Rod's poor postseason play? That's overblown. Yes, he was awful in
2005 and 2006. But does anyone really think that Rodriguez's batting .267
with a .353 on-base percentage and one home run this October was more to
blame for the Yankees' loss to the Indians than Chien-Ming Wang and his 19.06
ERA in two losses? Does anyone think A-Rod struggled more than Derek Jeter
(.176, no runs, one RBI)? Or that A-Rod's 2004 postseason (.320, 11 runs,
eight RBIs, three home runs) was why the Yankees didn't reach the World
Series that year? For that matter, do Angels fans want Vladimir Guerrero off
their team because he has three hits in his past 30 postseason at-bats?
Obviously A-Rod put too much pressure on himself and tried to do too much in
New York each October. Naturally, that brought on the predictable result of
subpar performance. But to say that a player who's hit .313, .308, .409 and
.421 in four of his eight postseason series as a starter (including one
series against, and another with, the Yankees) can't succeed in October is
just insane.
The point is, unless you surround him with the league's worst pitching staff
(I'm talking to you, Tom Hicks), A-Rod will help get your team in position to
play each October. And if you don't think so, I suggest you look at the back
of his baseball card and then honestly say those numbers wouldn't help your
team.
And if that still doesn't convince you, I give up. I just wish you were the
general manager of your favorite team. That way, there'd be one less suitor
for the best player in baseball.
--
Drive to my World:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=rodvader&book=19
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 203.69.75.117
推
11/15 15:30, , 1F
11/15 15:30, 1F
推
11/15 15:34, , 2F
11/15 15:34, 2F
推
11/15 15:46, , 3F
11/15 15:46, 3F
推
11/15 16:26, , 4F
11/15 16:26, 4F
推
11/15 17:32, , 5F
11/15 17:32, 5F
推
11/15 18:12, , 6F
11/15 18:12, 6F
推
11/15 20:09, , 7F
11/15 20:09, 7F
推
11/16 04:09, , 8F
11/16 04:09, 8F
→
11/16 13:06, , 9F
11/16 13:06, 9F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):