作者查詢 / x77
作者 x77 在 PTT [ Physics ] 看板的留言(推文), 共11則
限定看板:Physics
看板排序:
全部Palmar_Drama2326movie928Boy-Girl683Military516NBA426book327Suckcomic271sex203marvel158GUNDAM138Baki99C_Chat97ask50joke49Beauty47CrossStrait38DummyHistory34JOJO33Golden-Award32Baseball24cat22MRT22Hunter19ZARD18Eng-Class16gallantry16NARUTO13PSY13TOEIC13basketballTW12Physics11HK-movie10KS98-30210Comic9Olympics_ISG9WorldCup9CSSE8Fantasy8Doraemon7Wine7GraduateCram6HatePolitics6PC_Shopping6SuperHeroes6ClassicMusic5Instant_Mess5NIHONGO5Steam5Aquarium4BB_Online4CMWang4e-shopping4Instrument4ONLINE4AC_In3AyaseHaruka3CareerPlan3Health3junji-ITO3PingTung3Tennis3Aves2BLEACH2Buddhism2dog2FiremanLife2Jeremy_Lin2JetLi2JinYong2KoreanPop2media-chaos2MobileComm2NDHU-His1002NTHU_IIS2Plant2PokeMon2soul2Stock2Theater2TigerBlue2TomCruise2TuTsau2Web_Design2ADS1ArtCenter1Artfilm1ASIA-uni1Astros1bicycle1C_Question1CATCH1CCF1CCSH_88_3051CCU_CSIE87u1CFantasy1cksh85th3011cksh85th3071cksh85th3211CMU_M511CSMU-D971CSMU-D991CT24th3371CTS1DotA21EAseries1fatworld1FJU-Family1FLAT_CLUB1fruits1GO1Guardians1haiku1HatePicket1Health_Life1historia1I-Lan1japanavgirls1JapanMovie1juniorhigh1kawaii1kenichi1Kindaichi_Q1KOTDFansClub1KS95-3101KS97-3101KurokoBasket1Leon_Lai1LittleNew1LTK1Maiden_Road1medache1MenTalk1model1MP3-player1Mudran1NHLUE_LED971NTCU-DCT1001NTTU_CSIE991NTUST-EE-B931NUU_Talk1paranormal1PCSH91_3051PublicServan1Python1SCUG1SD-GundamOL1SKYU1SSSH-16th-Fk1Stephen1Swallows1TA_AN1TCFSHvolley1TKU_CE94C1TKU_EW94B1travian1USC1VideoCard1Warfare1YAO1YiGo3111YoungDotx31<< 收起看板(161)
首頁
上一頁
1
下一頁
尾頁
1F→:可是我比較的是能量...不是金錢08/02 23:30
2F→:你說的理論我懂...可是食物的熱量是未被食用前所含的熱量。08/02 23:31
4F→:你說的理論指的是食物鏈下層和上層所耗損的能量吧!08/02 23:33
8F推:樓上正是我問題的重點!08/02 23:38
9F→:目前雖然沒有機器人可比較,但是人體和電器比起來真是太省能了08/02 23:39
11F→:而且省的十分誇張...那食物和物理上的熱量有何差別呢?08/02 23:40
4F→:我的問題就是,這樣比起來是不是太誇張了! 有差那麼多嗎?08/02 12:04
13F→:不能這樣比,因為人還有很多其他的耗能...08/02 18:31
14F→:而且人如果運用齒輪來轉動扇葉,真的可以轉很久...08/02 18:31
15F→:和機器人比才是最合理的...這也是我ㄧ開始想到這問題的動機08/02 18:32
33F→:腦內的神經電子流...和引起的化學反應...可解釋嗎?08/02 11:46
首頁
上一頁
1
下一頁
尾頁