作者查詢 / waitwind
作者 waitwind 在 PTT 全部看板的留言(推文), 共26412則
限定看板:全部
看板排序:
全部C_Chat13256Gossiping5717Palmar_Drama3073Suckcomic934Isayama932NBA789HatePolitics698PCCU_Talk190KINGDOM87PushDoll76JinYong50nCoV201938Military34joke27movie24KingdomHuang23Lifeismoney22Atheism18Tainan18Chen-Hsing17Ocean17Test17StupidClown16Stock15WomenTalk13PublicIssue12Hate11historia11EYESHIELD219book8Linux8drawing7C_GenreBoard6EatToDie6NBAEasyChat6TPC_Police6Confucianism5creditcard5FLAT_CLUB5give5Little-Games5RumikoTWorld5Anti-ramp4Buddhism4Nurse4A1-GP3Chan_Mou3CYSH97Y3183Hunter3Insurance3Koei3L_TalkandCha3BERSERK2BigShiLin2BLEACH2Celtics2Doraemon2DPP2Feminism2GossipPicket2Hornets2Jeans2Kaohsiung2Knicks2KS96-3182NDHU-phy952Old-Games2pts2sex2specialman2THU-HIS972YZU_CN99A2About_Life1AC_In1ArakawaCow1ASHS-94sin1AT_PingPong1Bank_Service1bi-sexual1Boy-Girl1Broad_Band1CampusTour1ck56th3311cksh81st3091CMJH_93_3051CPU_CID7311Cross_Life1CSU1CyberFormula1Daan1Design1Disabled1DSLR1emprisenovel1Emulator1EZsoft1Falcom1FCU-ELEC-92A1FJU-ACCR941gallantry1Gantz1Geography1GIEE_BASKET1Gintama1globe1Hawks1HCHS933141HCSH1HisShark1HK_Comics1HLHS5thU1HLHS_10thU1HOT_Game1Hsinchu1HSNU_11351I.O.I1IA1ILSH-973051KoreaStar1KS92-3011KS92-3191LaClippers1LAW1LeBronJames1Marginalman1NCCU07_Ghis1NCCU_SEED1NCHU-Stat1NDHU-dc961NDMC-D611NIU_Talk1NKNU_OECE1001NOCHIGH1NTHU_STAT941NTNUch-941NTOU-EBFS921NTOU-MME-99B1NTU_BOTDorm1NTUChallenge1NtuDormM11NtuDormM31NTUDormM71NtuDormM81NTUE_NSE1001NTUE_Nse1011NTUE_Nse1021NTUE_Nse961NTUE_Nse991NTUEE_BL5271NTUEE_Lab5541NTUHI1NTUmed911NTUST-EMA1NUK_EE100A1NUU_Talk1ONE_PIECE1PCCU_AM1PCSH91_3051Peter_EN1PM1RTS1Salary1SAN1SCU-History1SHUTA1Soft_Job1SSSH-16th-Fk1streetfight1SYSOP1TA_AN1TaichungBun1TallClub1Tech_Job1TFG01Liang1TFSHS65th3221TFSHS66th3121THU-CHE961TigerBlue1Timberwolves1Tin-Ha1TKU_trans1TuTsau1UTAH-JAZZ1Warfare1WarHammer1Xien1YoungDotx31Yup-mwgc1Yup00-031Yup03-041<< 收起看板(190)
81F推: 呃,裁決書那個超過540%全都違法應該要220.136.82.143 09/06 15:49
83F→: 抗告吧,看起來就是法官沒搞清楚案情220.136.82.143 09/06 15:49
704F推: 有事實證明有可能串供就可以羈押了吧220.136.82.143 09/06 15:34
202F推: 恩...法務部講"似"不就他自己也不太確定220.136.82.143 09/06 14:59
25F噓: 呃...這篇在講甚麼,就不是通案啊.....220.136.82.143 09/06 14:35
37F噓: 確認了一下,台北市政府的新聞稿也沒有220.136.82.143 09/06 14:43
38F→: 處理能不能"個案讓廠商自己提"的問題啊220.136.82.143 09/06 14:43
39F→: 這是怎麼閱讀的.......220.136.82.143 09/06 14:44
40F→: 你又自稱同學都是醫生...........= =?220.136.82.143 09/06 14:44
123F推: 恩...好像滿有道理的220.136.82.143 09/06 14:31
41F推: 推SRadiant,這用法覺得沒啥不妥220.136.82.143 09/05 23:03
238F推: 呃,這多了吧,以為在拍電影喔220.136.82.143 09/04 17:08
104F推: 要先釐清準用的意思吧220.136.82.143 09/04 13:54
1F推: 有都委會討論內容嗎220.136.82.143 09/04 13:10
35F推: 都委會討論及審議確認好像就只是以前的220.136.82.143 09/04 13:17
38F→: 並不是收到監察院通知之後有新的審議?220.136.82.143 09/04 13:17
72F推: 恩...雖然沒有新的都委會審議,220.136.82.143 09/04 13:21
74F→: 但這新聞稿仍是背書之前的都委會220.136.82.143 09/04 13:22
76F推: 恩....推114.36.61.110 09/03 01:04