作者查詢 / uranusjr
作者 uranusjr 在 PTT [ C_and_CPP ] 看板的留言(推文), 共1758則
限定看板:C_and_CPP
看板排序:
全部ManUtd5815NY-Mets5715FAPL4348MLB3053MAC2063C_and_CPP1758Python1618bicycle1290Mavericks1257MacDev1021C_Chat794CM540Soft_Job430Linux357Food324fastfood302FORMULA1298FATE_GO281Militarylife225FBG146LaTeX132AC_In125Football124BridgeClub120HSNU_100499Blog88XBOX79C_Sharp78C_Question69LinuxDev66bridge60Sabermetrics58WindowsPhone58MLBGAME56Ruby56TypeMoon56Cobras55Haruhi54iPod54Windows54AndroidDev53CMWang36NBA36D_Nowitzki31EZsoft31BaseballSYS30CodeJob29MacGame26NY-Yankees25Shana25KenAkamatsu19Rozen_Maiden19Suckcomic19Baseball18bicycleshop18Key_Mou_Pad18Broad_Band17CVS17NBAGM17CCF16PublicIssue16BBSmovie15the_3EB15EYESHIELD2114Programming14AC_Music12bicycle-tour12iOS12PCman12GENSHIKEN11P2PSoftWare11Tsao11HSNU_BAND10PH-sports10BigShiLin9HSNU_NTU9Prospect9TY_Research9welcome_NHK9FIFAseries8Gossiping8WINNING_118Android7Browsers7H-GAME7Hotspur7Kawashita7KERORO7Nanoha7NTUWindBand7PH-927FBaseball6FuMouDiscuss6PH-916SRW6StarTrek6Translate-CS6Athletics5Cardinals5ComGame-Plan5CONCACAF5Editor5G-S-WARRIORS5HCKuo5Indians5Mariners5Monkeys5movie5PttCurrent5Sportcenter5StupidClown5Zhongshan5ask4BoardGame4Dodgers4katsura4MOD4Nationals4Perl4PLT4Rays4RedSox4Tech_Job4Argentina3ck61st3103Diamondbacks3Fantasy3Google3Headphone3Inference3java3jersey3Korea3Latin_AM3LoL3MiamiHeat3MIN-Twins3NBALive3NewYork3NTUMac3Railway3Rockies3SFGiants3Violation3Astros2Blue_Jays2ck49th3092CTU_LEAGUE2FCBarcelona2FPF2Hawks2Hayate2HsinYi2HSNU_10142ID_Multi2J-League2japanavgirls2joke2L_LifeJob2MacShop2NCCU03_BANK2Newcastle2NFL2NTU-EM912NTU-EM922Orl-Magic2PCSH91_3052Pelicans2Ramen2RSSH92_3042SFFamily2SocialSoccer2SoftPower2THU_BA20002UTAH-JAZZ2Visual_Basic2WorldCup2AlbertPujols1Angels1Asia1AVEncode1B_supporters1backQuarter1BigSanchung1BLAZERS1Brasil1Braves1Bucks1BVB_091CCJH-89g-3141CCJH-89g-3151Celtics1CH7th3101ChicagoBulls1Chulin-Chung1cjjhs3271ck48th3061ck55th3201ck56th3321ck58th3111cksh80th3071cksh80th3231CS92JIE1CSMU-D-DLP1CTSH923021Cubs1Daan1DET_Tigers1dsps-6yi1EatToDie1Emulator1Everton1Fiction1Final-Cut1FJU-ACC91a1FJU-ACCR931FJU-ACCR941FJU-Trade1FJU_GF1ForeignGame1Free_box1GO1GoldenEagles1HisSoccer1HOT_Game1HotBloodYuan1HOTPINK1HSNU_10081HSNU_10101HSNU_9541HSNU_9671HSNU_9771HSNU_j1021Hu_Yen_20041Ichiro1IME1Instant_Mess1Japan_Travel1KGSH92-3011Kindaichi_Q1Kings1KobeBryant1Korea_Sports1KS90-3091KS93-3041KS95-3181KS_PMAC1Law_Baseball1LeicesterCFC1lifeguard1LightNovel1Liverpool1Lost1MacGyver1MD-WALKMAN1media-chaos1mobile-game1MrFullswing1MRT1NANLIN3011NCCU00_Histo1NCCU04_LawHa1NCCU99_LAND1NCHU-AGR011NCHU-CE-361NCU_ME-94B1NDMC-guitar1Netherlands1Network1Nolan1NTPU-STAT951NTUFIN-911NTUHorti961Nuggets1outdoorgear1PDA1PH-901PHP1Rangers1Raptors1RegExp1Royals1RSSH91_3021RSSH93_3011Salary1SanFrancisco1Spurs1Statistics1street_style1SuckMovies1Taipei1TakahashiRie1Thunder1ThuPSBK1TTU-AMath1Warfare1Web_Design1WhiteSox1wretch1YAKYU1YCJH_3031YP-BA1YP91-3071YP91-3081Zhongzheng1<< 收起看板(305)
5F→: 這什麼爛功課, 出題的去甲賽啦01/27 21:37
12F→: 教 reserve 是滿重要的, 但是要求和 vector 一樣就甲賽01/27 21:44
13F→: 你要出就是直接給個 spec, 不是叫人去看 vector 行為01/27 21:45
4F→: char * 本來就是型別, 不是喜不喜歡的問題它本來就是...01/23 15:39
17F→: 貼圖是 Facebook 和 LINE 群組傳來的啊, 在那裡貼純文字01/23 20:52
18F→: 會跑格式所以貼圖是正規作法01/23 20:52
3F→: C++ source code 「平均」水準真的低到可怕 XD01/12 20:21
36F→: 與其加新東西我比較希望看到 C++ 砍功能, 不過不可能01/03 23:12
23F→: new 和 malloc 在根本上是一樣的概念12/24 10:01
35F→: 還是 Rust 大法好, 加上 lifetime 不會有這個問題了 (欸12/29 03:23
35F→: 應該不是說純 C, Win32 API 也是純 C 但是就完全沒問題12/27 17:27
36F→: VC++ 支援不好的是「ANSI C」12/27 17:28
2F→: 就跟書上寫的一樣啊, get 讀到換行停, 不拿走換行本身11/17 00:04
3F→: 第二個例子 get 看到換行停下, getline 讀到的第一個字11/17 00:04
4F→: 元就是被留下的換行, 就把換行拿走收工, 得到看到的結果11/17 00:05
1F→: 可是如果是簡單的 this.foo = new Foo; 應該會滿足 copy11/05 14:39
2F→: elision 條件, 編譯器會把多餘的那個 copy 省掉11/05 14:39
4F→: 樓上猜的沒錯, 因為指標沒有包含陣列長度, 無法遍歷11/03 23:51
5F→: http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/range-for11/03 23:51
6F→: Explanation 那邊第一條有寫 if the array has unknown11/03 23:51
7F→: size [...], the program is ill-formed11/03 23:52
8F→: 在 stack 的 array 知道自己的大小, 所以可以用11/03 23:53
14F→: 用人類語言來比例的話就是類似詞語 (vocabulary) 的概念10/26 13:30
15F→: 因為不只是實體本身, 還包含語意概念概念, 確實有點抽象10/26 13:31
16F→: 也沒什麼完美的解釋方法, 一下不能理解就慢慢體會吧, 急10/26 13:31
17F→: 著找明確的定義反而容易誤解10/26 13:32