作者查詢 / richshaker
作者 richshaker 在 PTT [ PhD ] 看板的留言(推文), 共93則
限定看板:PhD
看板排序:
全部Baseball27969CrossStrait3209Monkeys2991Gossiping1693Cross_Life930HsinTien481Doraemon312Beauty280Lifeismoney277Bank_Service240Theater168Hong_Kong140movie128Bunco118China_Travel112LamiGirls103RakutenGirls103Car-rent97PhD93WorkinChina81creditcard75Fund64Master_D63Matsu47MACAU43EuropeTravel42basketballTW32nCoV201929AfterPhD26hotspring24e-seller19FatMonkeys17Tai-travel16Actuary15Depstore13ck50th30212L_TalkandCha12HatePolitics11Stock11AmuroNamie10EmailYang10Lions10Hotel9Olympics_ISG9BaseballXXXX8Guardians8Nolan8Realityshow8sinica8WomenTalk8Facebook7joke7MLB7Motel7NBA7GossipPicket6Hualien6Android5Eng-Class5Football5Japan_Travel5CVS4Finance4IA4TFSHS62th3164Wen-Shan4ainori3Base_Picket3CheerGirlsTW3China-Drama3e-coupon3Elephants3FayeWong3give3MobilePay3money3NCCU3StupidClown3Tainan3Taitung3Anti-ramp2bookhouse2Boy-Girl2Chiayi2Dragons2fastfood2Hsinchu2Japandrama2JP_Entertain2KMT2MenTalk2MobileComm2NEW_ROC2NSYSU2railtour2SportLottery2Statistics2TOEIC2Anchors1AntiVirus1Arsenal1Asiantennis1Astros1Aviation1BabyBears1biker1Bus1C_Chat1car1ChungLi1ClashRoyale1Couchsurfing1CYUT1dictionary1Doctor-Info1Eason1EZsoft1FJU1Food1Gintama1haiku1HK-movie1home-sale1Ind-travel1iOS1KS97-3101KS98-3021library1Map-Guide1marvel1MIN-Twins1Mo-Musume1NCCU_Wine1NCHU_GINPPA1NCKU_CSIE931NCTU-STAT95G1NIHONGO1NTU1NTUND901NY-Yankees1PttHistory1Salary1ScienceNote1sex1Shu-Lin1ShuangHe1soul1Storage_Zone1studyteacher1tabletennis1Taoyuan1Tour-Agency1travel1VoIP1Wanhua1Warrant1WCDragons1weiyin1WuBai_and_CB1<< 收起看板(159)
19F推:沒有吧!我有個學弟就因為工作無法請假而放棄了01/05 16:34
21F推:文科太籠統,是文史哲還是社科類?若是後者,土博沒有11/28 17:50
22F→:什麼校名威的,112碰上洋博一樣是居劣勢11/28 17:51
23F→:再者,與其唸博不如先花力氣把塑膠飯碗升級(除非唸博11/28 17:53
24F→:對此有幫助)11/28 17:53
1F推:看有沒有用到結構方程,這不是用領域來劃分的吧11/05 22:38
21F推:119公行跟國發10/03 00:37
40F推:恭喜08/01 08:48
2F→:要看研討會的性質,還有你的審稿人,一般來說社科領域11/21 22:43
3F→:的研討會一般來說的確是大家發表文章初稿、徵詢修改意11/21 22:44
4F→:見的場合,作為後續投期刊的參考。但是即使如此,文章11/21 22:46
5F→:至少也要有個大致的架構和初步研究成果出來,不然只是11/21 22:47
6F→:打壞自己名聲。至於一稿多投,即使是研討會,比較嚴謹11/21 22:48
7F→:的學者也會覺得這不符學術倫理。當然也有人根本把研討11/21 22:49
8F→:會當成social場合,或只是想在學術履歷上多加一兩行(11/21 22:50
9F→:已現在學術環境來說幾無意義),這就看各人心態了11/21 22:51
30F推:在社科領域也很正常,台幣800多才是異類11/02 23:27
35F推:國外"分段賣"的都看過,非自己發表的panel進去聽要另付11/05 00:18
36F→:錢,聽好幾場有打折,午餐什麼的更不用說了,當然另付11/05 00:19
37F→:臺灣社科領域的研討會比較少在收錢,有的話大概是幾百11/05 00:20
38F→:塊意思一下11/05 00:20
7F推:長知識,推一下!我是覺得原po回來還是有機會的07/13 15:49
67F推:東南亞所還有淡大,至於師大東亞文化,keke...07/12 18:36
16F推:看來博士雞排不搞連鎖不行,已經聽過太多人要開了02/21 02:19