作者查詢 / CrazyMarc
作者 CrazyMarc 在 PTT 全部看板的留言(推文), 共6795則
限定看板:全部
看板排序:
全部politics2182LAW1074stationery672Insurance464Policy262L_SecretGard240CFP234KMT223Lawyer200DPP188PttLifeLaw141HatePolitics121Fund64calligraphic61Suit_Style52Steam49HolySee45LegalTheory40B93A013XX34Examination34Wargaming32ChineseMed26Gossiping19About_Life17CrossStrait17tax16W-Philosophy13L_LifePlan12B95A013XX10ID_Multi10B94A013XX9Beauty9TANAKA9RIPE_gender8LawsuitSug7medache7Salesperson7SUN7toberich7FORMULA16Marxism6GreenParty4MCU-LAW4a-diane3Atheism3CTSH923033drawing3money3NEW_ROC3NTU-PDC3NTUBIME-1023PCCU_MLAW3StupidClown3Tobacco3TSU3B93A012XX2B97A013XX2HsinTien2Japandrama2Kojima2KOTDFansClub2MetalGear2NTULawR972PttLaw2Scorpio2sex2AGEC941AGECR901Agronomy-931B911010XX1B91303XXX1B923022XX1B923023XX1B92A013XX1B933021XX1B96A013XX1bioinfo_lab1CATCH1CFantasy1CGSH87th_3151ChthoniC1civil911civil921cksh81st3021Coffee1DummyHistory1DYU1Economics1Education1EMS1ESOE-911ESOE-921FJU_Psy961FLAT_CLUB1Geotecheng941INSECT-921KS92-3061KUAS_5880321media-chaos1Military1Militarylife1MountainClub1MU1NCCU07_Ghis1NCCU_CivLaw1NCCU_CriLaw1NCCU_FunLaw1NCCU_LSWLAW1NCCU_PubLaw1NTOU-MME-99B1NTPUprolaw981NTU-EM921NTU-EM931NTU-EM941NTU96thLIS1NTUAC911NtuDormF51NTUDormG11NtuDormM31NtuDormM51NTUDormM61NTUDormM71NtuDormM81NTUEE1061NTUEE1071NTUEOE_R306A1NTUF-921NTUF-941NTUFM-911NTUGIEE_EDA1NTUHistory941NTULawR931NTUMEB91-B1NTUMEB93-A1NTUMEB93-B1NTUMSE-911NTUMSE-921NTUMSE-931NTUMSE-941NTUnba20051NTUnSA1NTUSA1P2PSoftWare1PC_Shopping1Philosophy1PoliticLaw1PresidentLi1Printer_scan1PU_Law1PublicAffair1PublicServan1shoes1single1study1Tainan1TNFSH94011TTU-AFL1TunHua05t3111TW-history1TYSH49-1101Warfare1<< 收起看板(161)
1F推:憲法學者會跟你講權利還有高低之分,而220.137.162.196 01/02 15:09
2F→:生命是基本權絕對的核心,不能徹底剝奪220.137.162.196 01/02 15:10
8F→:正義只不過是一種語言定義而已220.137.162.196 01/02 15:19
17F推:又要出動Holmes大法官的大絕了嗎? XD220.137.162.196 01/02 15:22
21F→:The law of life, not logic220.137.162.196 01/02 15:23
22F→:But the experience220.137.162.196 01/02 15:23
25F→:如果廢死運動的主流仍然是國家、人民、220.137.162.196 01/02 15:25
26F→:生命、人權、法理論、邏輯,那就真的要220.137.162.196 01/02 15:25
28F→:繼續廢死100年了(也許不止)220.137.162.196 01/02 15:26
31F→:不去扭轉群眾的社會經驗,廢死不可能220.137.162.196 01/02 15:26
40F→:其實問題是:他們有「犯罪」嗎? XD220.137.162.196 01/02 15:28
47F推:吵架是彰顯自己主體性的好方法(笑)220.137.162.196 01/02 15:30
52F推:解決問題是目的嗎???220.137.162.196 01/02 15:35
54F推:我沒想吵啊 XD 你看我有烙理論嗎?220.137.162.196 01/02 15:44
55F→:我可是很務實的220.137.162.196 01/02 15:44
466F→:人類享有復仇快感的天賦人權220.137.162.196 01/02 14:39
467F→:矯治、社會復歸等理論到頭來不過是一場220.137.162.196 01/02 14:40
468F→:美麗的誤會220.137.162.196 01/02 14:40
484F推:再怎麼宣揚人權觀念,都無法促成消滅群220.137.162.196 01/02 14:50
485F→:眾復仇情感需求的目標,原PO要繼續嗎?220.137.162.196 01/02 14:51
486F→:不從人性著眼,而始終在法理、社會學打220.137.162.196 01/02 14:52
487F→:轉,無怪廢死運動徒勞無功220.137.162.196 01/02 14:52
489F推:那又如何,不接受就是不接受,你能如何220.137.162.196 01/02 14:54
490F→:看廢死團體的挫敗我很爽很高興220.137.162.196 01/02 14:54
491F→:就讓他們繼續廢死100年吧( ′-`)y-~220.137.162.196 01/02 14:55
493F→:繼續戰啊,看哪一天能廢死220.137.162.196 01/02 14:55
496F→:講難聽一點,不是廢死不好,而是搞廢死220.137.162.196 01/02 14:57
497F→:的人本身就在截斷廢死的可能性220.137.162.196 01/02 14:57
499F推:原來搞廢死的只想戰贏?讓你贏又如何?220.137.162.196 01/02 15:00
500F→:要廢死?作夢220.137.162.196 01/02 15:01
501F→:繼續文明人的說教吧220.137.162.196 01/02 15:01
502F→:除了彰顯自我優越感,什麼都作不到220.137.162.196 01/02 15:01
506F推:輸贏重要嗎?反廢死在嘴巴上輸了又如何220.137.162.196 01/02 15:04
507F→:在現實世界裡,我們就是贏啊220.137.162.196 01/02 15:04
508F→:宰制這世界的,是人心而非理論220.137.162.196 01/02 15:05
510F推:要講許大法官的少數意見贏了220.137.162.196 01/02 15:19
545F推:對錯不重要,問題是:你接受嗎?220.137.162.196 01/02 16:11
569F推:有義務推動≠擔保實現220.137.162.196 01/02 16:37
1F推:還有,忽視單位成本而只說總成本低220.137.162.196 01/01 19:09
12F→:人的本質...天知道?220.137.161.8 12/30 17:15
14F→:廢死不過也是一種教條罷了220.137.161.8 12/30 17:15
31F推:我天生討厭傳教士,沒辦法220.137.161.8 12/30 17:21
1F推:其實這樣的論證是有效的,因為它的謬誤220.137.161.8 12/30 14:07
2F→:不是在形式上,而是非形式謬誤220.137.161.8 12/30 14:07
1F→:論證有效,只不過前提非真220.137.161.8 12/29 14:36
1F→:你確定沒有PO錯版?12/28 22:16
2F→:是的,不過卻是拿幕後老闆的薪水12/28 11:01
6F推:跟無法分辨推論有效性和真假值的人認真幹嘛?12/28 14:11
295F推:不管啦,我說是誤判就是誤判220.137.161.8 12/28 20:48