Re: [資訊] Tetris由來

看板tetris作者 (帕索)時間12年前 (2012/08/24 17:26), 編輯推噓10(1004)
留言14則, 5人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
http://tinyurl.com/8wguvh3 GAME DESIGN THEORY & PRACTICE SECOND EDITION BY Richard Rouse III p.149 It has been reported that Pajitnov, in creating Tetris, originally considered using pieces consisting of five squares combined into twelve unique pieces. Indeed, the pentomino game from which Pajitnov drew his inspiration used twelve five-square pieces. Pajitnov soon realized that this was too many different pieces to have to manipulate in Tetris's high-pressure setting, where players have a limited amount of time to find a perfect fit for a given piece. Certainly a game using five-square pieces could have been challenging in its own way, and perhaps a slower falling speed and larger play-field could have compensated for the added complexity of the larger pieces. But would it have been Tetris? No. Would it have been as fun and addictive as Tetris? Proably not. At some point a complexity level begins to stifle the core nature of a game and confuses players instead of challenging them. Using five insead of four squares ruined the simplicity Pajitnov was striving for, and as a result he reduced the number of squares a piece could have. Similarly, if he had used only three squares, the game would have been too simple. It would appear Tetris expertly follows the adage that everything should be as simple as possible but no simpler. 根據報導 Pajitnov 在創造俄羅斯方塊的時候,原本想使用的是五個方塊所組成的十二個 互異的形狀。的確,引發 Pajitnov 靈感的五連方塊遊戲,是使用十二片五方格的拼塊。 Pajitnov 很快就發現,若限制玩家在一段時間內將特定拼塊放置在最適當的地方,這樣的 形狀數量太多。當然,若使用五連方塊會變得很有挑戰性,並且較緩的掉落速度以及較寬 的盤面可以彌補形狀太複雜的缺陷。但這樣還會是俄羅斯方塊嗎?不。這會跟俄羅斯方塊 一樣有趣且吸引人嗎?可能不會。複雜性太過只會扼殺遊戲的精髓,並使玩家感到困擾, 而不會想挑戰它。以五個方塊取代四個,將破壞 Pajitnov 所追求的單純性。同樣的,假 若他只使用三個,遊戲就會變得太簡單了。(後略) There are actually thirteen unique combinations of five squares possible, where each square shares a side with another square. So it would appear that the original pentomino game, with its twelve bolcks, did not use a complete set of pieces. I have never tried pentomino, so I have no idea how much fun that puzzle may be. Part of what makes Tetris so elegant is the completeness of its pieces. Every possible permutation of four squares with squares sharing sides is used in the game. Remove any one of the pieces from Tetris and the game's balance would suffer. When playing, players will find themselves presented with situations that cry out for certain pieces. Certain arrangements of the blocks on the bottom of the screen leave holes that can only be perfecly filled by a specific Tetris piece. Part of what leds Teris its balance is the fact that Pajitnov was wise enough to include each piece possible, thus providing a piece for every type of gap. The natural completness and symmetry of the pieces available to players in Tetris is a crucial component of its balace. 帕索強調,五連方塊真的只有十二個,不曉得作者為何要說十三個... 後面懶得翻了... 不曉得這部分是不是板主大大想要知道的部分? -- ~帕索板四徵兆~ 戰略高手 遊戲, 數位, 程設 PlayingGame 遊戲 Σ遊戲 棋藝 橋牌 謎  ○ * \○/ (○ Puzzle 益智 ◎ ╦╦└□ " ○□═ □  □> ║║√√ ╦══╦ ∥  |\ 歡樂帕索板 上B愛解謎 睡著還惦記 解完好開心 卡解傷腦筋 歡迎你一起來玩ψmaplemiracle -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 210.60.122.200

08/24 18:30, , 1F
帕索!!!朝聖之
08/24 18:30, 1F

08/24 19:07, , 2F
推認真
08/24 19:07, 2F

08/24 19:18, , 3F
原來認識我的人好多...orz
08/24 19:18, 3F
※ 編輯: puzzlez 來自: 123.194.20.32 (08/24 19:36)

08/24 20:13, , 4F
居然還有書XD 不過感覺跟作品還有創造者的關係雷同
08/24 20:13, 4F

08/24 20:14, , 5F
過程中隨時都是靈感啊
08/24 20:14, 5F

08/24 23:26, , 6F
(^ ^)
08/24 23:26, 6F

08/25 13:46, , 7F
平生不識帕索 便玩遊戲也枉然XD
08/25 13:46, 7F

08/25 13:49, , 8F
這篇跟上篇推文 我之後讀完編進精華區wiki翻譯
08/25 13:49, 8F

08/25 15:18, , 9F
我不認識...我枉然了...
08/25 15:18, 9F

08/25 19:57, , 10F
XDD
08/25 19:57, 10F

08/25 22:56, , 11F
不認識比較自然啦...像我都想不到為何Rentch大會...
08/25 22:56, 11F

08/25 22:57, , 12F
認識我....難道他是本板的潛水夫嗎?
08/25 22:57, 12F

08/26 12:02, , 13F
我有問過quarto的問題 也玩過有無的題目XD
08/26 12:02, 13F

09/12 15:14, , 14F
文章代碼(AID): #1GDqZD17 (tetris)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1GDqZD17 (tetris)