Re: [國中] 關代問題疑問
※ 引述《chljk (油膩膩)》之銘言：
: 抱歉,文法方面我幫不到你
: 但我覺得題目本身有問題
: 一般口語話根本不會這樣說
: 若我我會說:
: Mr. Brown spent a lot of money on a villa with two big rooms
: and a garden.
: 或是
: Mr. Brown spent a lot of money buying a villa, which has two big rooms
: and a garden.
: 有時過於注重文法,卻忽略外國人本身是否真會這樣用
: 有點模糊了我們學英文的重點
: ※ 引述《candydream (Better and better!)》之銘言：
: : 昨天是憑記憶打出的句子,今天上班看了一下,上來更正,希望大家再提供見解@@
: : Mr. Brown spent a lot of money buying a villa _____ there are two
: : big rooms and a garden. (A) it (B) he (C) that (D) X
: : 答案給C ,題目卷詳解給的理由是 that/which 皆可,因為關代做為S
: : 有板友提出答案應為where,這也是昨天我和同事討論出的結論之ㄧ,
: : 認為應該是 which there are two big rooms and a garden in
: : = in which there are two big rooms and a garden
: : = where there are two big rooms and a garden
: : 但我還想確認能不能解成 that + S + V + O 作為villa這個受詞的補語呢?
: : 謝謝 ^^
其實我之前也有碰過同樣的問題，所以我那時就去找了一下文法書
(English Grammar--A function-based introduction)
Chap 9整章都是在談關係子句，我大概把書裡的一點重點打下來，希望能幫助到你。
9.3.3 The Relative Pronoun Strategy
The first relativization strategy in English involves the use of case-marked
relative pronouns.In most cases, these pronouns are derived historically from
case-marked interrogative pronouns.Typical though somewhat idealized examples
are:
(44)
a. subject : The man "who" stopped by the house...
b. object : The man "whom" she married...
c. Place : The village "where" she lived...
d. Reason : (The reason)"why" she left...
e. Time : (The time)"when" he arrived...
f. manner : (The way) "how" she did it...
In the case of subject and object(44a,b), the need to specify the case-role
of the missing noun is real, given that typically "a man" can be either
subject, object, or indirect object. In the case of examples(44c,d,e,f), the
need for case-role assignment is to some extent superfluous. This is so because
the head nouns themselves--"village/reason/time/way"--are semantically
constraining.
By their very meaning, they tend to suggest the case-role of the missing noun--
location, reason, time, manner, respectively.
9.3.4 The Relative Subordinator Strategy
Another relativization strategy in English dispenses with case-marked
relative-pronouns, and employs the neutral "subordinator"--that--at the
beginning of the relative clause.This strategy cannot be used freely for all
case-roles. It is employed most commonly with direct or some indirect object
roles, and less commonly with subjects and adverbial roles.
Some examples: Cf.44
(45)
a. subject: The man "that"stopped...
b. object : The man "that" she married...
c. Place : *The village "that" she lived...
d. Time : *The time "that" he arrived...
e. Manner : ?(The way) "that" she did it...
f. Reason : (The reason)"that" he left...
g. Indirect object: The woman that he lived with...
When this strategy is available, choosing the invariant "that" over a case-marked
relative-pronoun is a matter of considerable variation along lines of
dialect, style, age, register, and individual preference. What is more, the use
of the invariant "that" contributes nothing to "recovering" the case-role of
the missing referent. Unlike Relative-pronouns, "that" is morphologically
neutral,and yields no clue about the case-role of the missing co-referent role.
希望你看完這些覺得有幫助。
很值得看的一本書唷!:)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.249.181.140
※ 編輯: Ryan310265 來自: 111.249.181.140 (01/27 10:24)
※ 編輯: Ryan310265 來自: 111.249.181.140 (01/27 10:25)
推
01/28 02:41, , 1F
01/28 02:41, 1F
推
01/28 20:52, , 2F
01/28 20:52, 2F
討論串 (同標題文章)