Re: [問題] 在美國印原文書

看板studyabroad作者 (Kay)時間12年前 (2011/10/28 11:37), 編輯推噓2(2推 0噓 16→)
留言18則, 4人參與, 最新討論串4/4 (看更多)
Since it happens to be one of my majors, to give you an idea: Copyright Fair Use: Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106a (relating to rights in copyrighted works), the fair use of a copyrighted work, including use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as CRITICISM, Comment, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING (including multiple copies for classroom use), SCHOLARSHIP, or RESEARCH, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include – 1) The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes. 2) The nature of the copyrighted work 3) The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted works as a whole 4) The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. Hence, if you get the PDF file from professor, it is a fair use. Otherwise, it is an infringement. The school could kick you out for this. You can get 2nd-handed book in perfect condition on amazon. Even if you have to get the latest version, you can sell it to amazon afterward. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 98.218.43.82
推
10/28 12:00, , 1F
想請問一下 之前老闆找到一本書的pdf檔(有全書) 叫我去看
10/28 12:00, 1F
→
10/28 12:01, , 2F
那本書基本上是要有校內ip才可連上下載 那我下載了 想去印出
10/28 12:01, 2F
→
10/28 12:02, , 3F
來裝訂成書 這樣算不算有問題呢? 我本來的想法是 既然是校內
10/28 12:02, 3F
→
10/28 12:02, , 4F
ip才可下載 那表示學校是買下來給學生使用 我只要不轉送買賣
10/28 12:02, 4F
→
10/28 12:03, , 5F
自己想印出來訂成書應該沒問題 可是真的是這樣嗎?
10/28 12:03, 5F
→
10/28 12:13, , 6F
for research purpose, we would see it as a fair use.
10/28 12:13, 6F
→
10/28 12:14, , 7F
including use by reproduction in copies
10/28 12:14, 7F
→
10/28 12:30, , 8F
" hence "
10/28 12:30, 8F
→
10/28 12:32, , 9F
the PDF from the professor is an authorized use, not
10/28 12:32, 9F
→
10/28 12:32, , 10F
fair use.
10/28 12:32, 10F
推
10/28 12:49, , 11F
一般來說 拿一個合法的版本 不管實體或電子
10/28 12:49, 11F
→
10/28 12:50, , 12F
自己列印／複印 自己看 基本不違法（指書籍。影音另有法規）
10/28 12:50, 12F
→
10/28 12:51, , 13F
拿去影印店 要人家收你錢幫你印 就違法
10/28 12:51, 13F
→
10/28 12:58, , 14F
when prof gives out copies as material, it's fair use
10/28 12:58, 14F
※ 編輯: aacathy 來自: 98.218.43.82 (10/28 12:59)
→
10/28 14:10, , 15F
just check the e-Version of Harvard Business Review for
10/28 14:10, 15F
→
10/28 14:11, , 16F
Pdf. Check their TOU.
10/28 14:11, 16F
→
10/28 14:11, , 17F
And since when, copyright law becomes a major?
10/28 14:11, 17F
→
10/28 14:12, , 18F
I've never heard anything like 著作權系(所)。
10/28 14:12, 18F
‣ 更多 aacathy 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1EgYEH9M (studyabroad)
‣ 更多 aacathy 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1EgYEH9M (studyabroad)