Re: [問題] 聯絡教授
※ 引述《rhead (Tedious)》之銘言：
: 以下是一些教授的回應
: 1. Thank you for your interest. I receive dozens of student inquiries, but your
: statement is very well written, and your experiences and interests are very
: in-line with my own. You also have a lot of field experiences, which I highly
: value. I strongly encourage you to apply to not only Env. Studies, but also
: Geography (deadline Dec 1).
: Do you have any funding?
: 我回了一些客套話並說我會申請另一個program 還有我沒有funding
: 就沒有下文了
先查一下這個教授在Geography有沒joint appointment
根據字面上應該蠻有意思的，只是可能在funding上有些限制
: 2.I appreciate your interest in our program. We have a variety of research
: efforts in the surface flux / urban environment area, involving a number of
: faculty members. We look forward to reviewing your application.
: 這間學校只有寄個這個教授 當然SOP裡只有提到他(申請資料中的SOP還有提到另外兩個
: 教授) 很妙的是 他也把我寄給他的信轉給另外兩個老師 至少表示我沒選錯老師
: 一樣回了一些客套話 就沒有下文了
很客套的回應，應該是對你沒特別的興趣
: 3.Thank you very much for your email and interest in our research program.
: You have an excellent academic background. At the present time I am waiting
: to here back on funding opportunities/decisions so I'm not able to offer a
: position at this time. However, I would encourage you to apply to our graduate
: program in Land and Atmospheric Science (www.laas.umn.edu). There is a
: possibility that you could receive a scholarship. In the meantime, I will
: contact you immediately if I receive good news about research funding.
: 我回了 已經申請好了 期待可以跟他一起工作之類的 才寄信沒多久 也不知道會回我啥
: 我的經驗是 寫信聯絡有回信的比例還蠻高的 但是好像都沒有直接的結果或是進一步的
: 討論 又或是直接拒絕我XD 不過至少我有吸引到他們的注意吧 能多點心思看我的申請
: 資料感覺就不錯 我想請問一下我收到這些回應是好不好呢? submmit之後 很空虛啊!!
看來他建議你去申請LAAS，那就去申請吧，機率應該很高
話說這幾封e-mail都寫得很straightforward..
應該不太需要翻譯吧..
--
如果能在開滿了梔子花的山坡上 與你相遇
如果能 眷地愛過一次再別離
那麼 再長久的一生 不也就只是 就只是
回首時 那短短的一瞬
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 116.87.86.19
→
11/24 23:17, , 1F
11/24 23:17, 1F
→
11/24 23:22, , 2F
11/24 23:22, 2F
→
11/24 23:24, , 3F
11/24 23:24, 3F
推
09/11 07:54,
6年前
, 4F
09/11 07:54, 4F
→
09/11 07:54,
6年前
, 5F
09/11 07:54, 5F
討論串 (同標題文章)