Re: [問題] 能幫忙算算冷氣的耗電程度嗎??
有人又在不懂裝懂誤導別人了,1KW/H=1度?
所以1KW電器使用半小時,電度反而倍增,1KW/0.5H=2度!
沒常識就算了,可能連小學都沒畢業,原來數學式是這樣用的 = =||
再去打小報告吧,整天只會洗板散播錯誤資訊來誤導求助的板友,
被人糾正錯誤就哭著打小報告 ˋ(′_‵||)ˊ
建議原po,參考別間用電來付費是很笨也很不準確的方法,
特別是有冷氣的時候,使用與否、使用時間、使用溫度,影響結果非常大,
我曾寫過一篇文章提到電力監測器這種東西,
市價約一千出頭而已,使用也很簡單,
把電力監測器插到插座,再把電器插到電力監測器上的插孔即可,
可以很精確量測電器耗用的電度數,
1度電 = 1kw * 1hour
但事實上電器標示的功率不一定是真實消耗功率,
你照上面數據計算已經可能犯了基本錯誤,更何況你無法精確掌握使用時間。
就拿冷氣來說,產品標示的功率就只有一個值,
但同樣使用時間,不同的冷氣溫度,消耗功率可能有很大差異,
不然那些節能專家何必一天到晚教大家把冷氣溫度調高?
還「標示和實施二者間會有一個小誤差.旦差距一般不大」咧!
怎麼有人這麼喜歡不懂裝懂,一天到晚散播錯誤資訊誤導別人呢! ˋ(′_‵||)ˊ
使用電力監測器就不必自己估算半天,用多少電會自動累積顯示出來,
不過最徹底的解決還是請房東安裝獨立電表,
不然口說無憑,對方都可以拿出千百個理由來爭執。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.70.175.181
※ 編輯: xupborn 來自: 219.70.175.181 (09/18 19:16)
推
09/18 19:23, , 1F
09/18 19:23, 1F
→
09/18 19:25, , 2F
09/18 19:25, 2F
→
09/18 19:29, , 3F
09/18 19:29, 3F
推
09/18 19:30, , 4F
09/18 19:30, 4F
→
09/18 19:31, , 5F
09/18 19:31, 5F
→
09/18 19:31, , 6F
09/18 19:31, 6F
→
09/18 19:32, , 7F
09/18 19:32, 7F
→
09/18 19:32, , 8F
09/18 19:32, 8F
推
09/18 19:37, , 9F
09/18 19:37, 9F
→
09/18 19:37, , 10F
09/18 19:37, 10F
推
09/18 19:39, , 11F
09/18 19:39, 11F
→
09/18 19:40, , 12F
09/18 19:40, 12F
→
09/18 19:41, , 13F
09/18 19:41, 13F
→
09/18 19:41, , 14F
09/18 19:41, 14F
→
09/18 19:42, , 15F
09/18 19:42, 15F
推
09/18 19:45, , 16F
09/18 19:45, 16F
→
09/18 19:45, , 17F
09/18 19:45, 17F
→
09/18 19:45, , 18F
09/18 19:45, 18F
→
09/18 19:46, , 19F
09/18 19:46, 19F
推
09/18 19:48, , 20F
09/18 19:48, 20F
推
09/18 19:51, , 21F
09/18 19:51, 21F
→
09/18 19:52, , 22F
09/18 19:52, 22F
→
09/18 19:53, , 23F
09/18 19:53, 23F
推
09/18 21:19, , 24F
09/18 21:19, 24F
→
09/18 22:53, , 25F
09/18 22:53, 25F
→
09/18 22:53, , 26F
09/18 22:53, 26F
→
09/18 22:54, , 27F
09/18 22:54, 27F
→
09/18 22:54, , 28F
09/18 22:54, 28F
→
09/18 22:55, , 29F
09/18 22:55, 29F
→
09/18 22:56, , 30F
09/18 22:56, 30F
→
09/18 22:57, , 31F
09/18 22:57, 31F
→
09/18 22:59, , 32F
09/18 22:59, 32F
→
09/18 22:59, , 33F
09/18 22:59, 33F
→
09/18 23:01, , 34F
09/18 23:01, 34F
→
09/18 23:02, , 35F
09/18 23:02, 35F
→
09/18 23:08, , 36F
09/18 23:08, 36F
→
09/18 23:10, , 37F
09/18 23:10, 37F
推
09/18 23:10, , 38F
09/18 23:10, 38F
→
09/18 23:10, , 39F
09/18 23:10, 39F
→
09/18 23:12, , 40F
09/18 23:12, 40F
→
09/18 23:13, , 41F
09/18 23:13, 41F
→
09/18 23:14, , 42F
09/18 23:14, 42F
→
09/18 23:14, , 43F
09/18 23:14, 43F
推
09/19 00:05, , 44F
09/19 00:05, 44F
→
09/19 00:06, , 45F
09/19 00:06, 45F
→
09/19 00:10, , 46F
09/19 00:10, 46F
→
09/19 00:11, , 47F
09/19 00:11, 47F
→
09/19 00:11, , 48F
09/19 00:11, 48F
→
09/19 00:12, , 49F
09/19 00:12, 49F
→
09/19 00:12, , 50F
09/19 00:12, 50F
→
09/19 00:12, , 51F
09/19 00:12, 51F
→
09/19 00:15, , 52F
09/19 00:15, 52F
→
09/19 00:16, , 53F
09/19 00:16, 53F
→
09/19 00:16, , 54F
09/19 00:16, 54F
→
09/19 00:17, , 55F
09/19 00:17, 55F
→
09/19 00:18, , 56F
09/19 00:18, 56F
推
09/19 00:21, , 57F
09/19 00:21, 57F
→
09/19 00:21, , 58F
09/19 00:21, 58F
→
09/19 00:25, , 59F
09/19 00:25, 59F
→
09/19 00:26, , 60F
09/19 00:26, 60F
→
09/19 00:27, , 61F
09/19 00:27, 61F
推
09/19 00:28, , 62F
09/19 00:28, 62F
→
09/19 00:28, , 63F
09/19 00:28, 63F
→
09/19 00:28, , 64F
09/19 00:28, 64F
→
09/19 00:29, , 65F
09/19 00:29, 65F
→
09/19 00:30, , 66F
09/19 00:30, 66F
推
09/19 00:35, , 67F
09/19 00:35, 67F
→
09/19 00:36, , 68F
09/19 00:36, 68F
→
09/19 00:36, , 69F
09/19 00:36, 69F
→
09/19 00:37, , 70F
09/19 00:37, 70F
推
09/19 00:41, , 71F
09/19 00:41, 71F
→
09/19 00:42, , 72F
09/19 00:42, 72F
→
09/19 00:42, , 73F
09/19 00:42, 73F
→
09/19 00:44, , 74F
09/19 00:44, 74F
→
09/19 00:44, , 75F
09/19 00:44, 75F
→
09/19 00:44, , 76F
09/19 00:44, 76F
→
09/19 00:53, , 77F
09/19 00:53, 77F
→
09/19 00:54, , 78F
09/19 00:54, 78F
→
09/19 00:54, , 79F
09/19 00:54, 79F
→
09/19 00:55, , 80F
09/19 00:55, 80F
→
09/19 01:14, , 81F
09/19 01:14, 81F
→
09/19 01:15, , 82F
09/19 01:15, 82F
→
09/19 01:15, , 83F
09/19 01:15, 83F
噓
09/19 13:26, , 84F
09/19 13:26, 84F
→
09/19 18:11, , 85F
09/19 18:11, 85F
→
09/19 18:13, , 86F
09/19 18:13, 86F
→
09/19 18:15, , 87F
09/19 18:15, 87F
→
09/19 19:11, , 88F
09/19 19:11, 88F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 7 篇):