[新聞] 歐巴馬才是那個大砍CDC預算的元凶已刪文

看板nCoV2019作者 (雲淡風清)時間4年前 (2020/03/30 09:32), 4年前編輯推噓28(28042)
留言70則, 28人參與, 4年前最新討論串1/1
簡單說,就是拜登指控川普砍CDC預算導致防疫不力 但FactCheck.org這個網站調查發現 實際上川普執政下CDC的預算是有被國會加回去的 真正砍CDC預算的是誰???就是歐巴馬 (拜登那時可是副總統) 歐巴馬在2013財政年度給CDC砍了5.69億美元 2015財政年度預算中,砍4.14億美元 2017財政年度預算??2.51億美元 別以為趁防疫時打選戰抹黑是台灣的專利,老美也玩這套 完整標題: Obama admin repeatedly sought millions in CDC funding cuts, despite Biden's attacks on Trump preparedness 發稿單位: Foxnews 發稿時間: 2020/3/27 撰 稿 者: Gregg Re | Fox News 原文連結:https://reurl.cc/z8WxXQ Get all the latest news on coronavirus and more delivered daily to your inbox. Sign up here. The Obama administration repeatedly sought to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in funding to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), yearly budget requests show -- seemingly undercutting former Vice President Joe Biden's repeated attacks on the Trump White House for its pandemic preparedness. Numerous Democrats, including Biden, have falsely claimed that Trump slashed the CDC budget, and Biden has suggested that he would never pursue similar cuts. The Associated Press has noted that those claims "distort" the facts, with FactCheck.org pointing out that CDC funding has actually increased under the current administration, largely because Congress insisted on maintaining funding levels for both CDC and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Nevertheless, speaking to ABC News' “This Week” on March 1, Biden claimed: “They’ve cut the funding for the CDC.” On Friday, Biden stepped up his attacks, writing on Twitter: "Donald Trump's careless, shortsighted actions left our nation ill-prepared and now Americans are paying the price." In its fiscal year 2013 budget, while Biden was vice president, the Obama administration sought a total funding level of $5.9 billion from the CDC, or a $569 million cut from the 2012 budget of $6.46 billion. In fiscal year 2015, the Obama administration wanted a $414 million cut year-over-year, and again in the fiscal year 2017 budget, the Obama administration looked to eliminate $251 million in CDC funding. The proposed cuts take into account money budgeted for The Prevention and Public Health Fund, which was established under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 to bolster the nation's health care system. When not including that fund, the Obama administration sought CDC cuts in five of its eight years. Some of the Obama administration's cuts specifically took aim at the CDC's preparedness initiatives. “Now, President Obama’s 2012 budget calls for paring some of that spending. Funding for a public health emergency preparedness program run by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was cut by about $72 million below fiscal 2010 levels in the budget proposal.” The Wall Street Journal reported in 2012. Those cuts would later intensify. “The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) takes a hit of about $270 million in the Obama administration's proposed fiscal year 2014 budget, including significant cuts to biodefense and emergency preparedness programs," according to a 2013 post from the Center For Infectious Disease Research And Policy. US WAS BEST-PREPARED COUNTRY IN WORLD TO HANDLE PANDEMICS, JOHNS HOPKINS FOUND Then, in 2015, President Obama called for $50 million in budget cuts amid a measles outbreak -- and White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest's claims that ObamaCare would pick up the slack were rated false by The Washington Post's fact-checker. “Chipping away at 317 funds — even if the majority of cuts are going toward vaccine purchases — jeopardizes the immunization system in general, public-health officials and advocates say. It restricts the ability of local public health departments to prepare for and respond to outbreaks and educate providers, Chris Aldridge, senior director for infectious disease at the National Association of County and City Health Officials, told The Washington Post in 2015. During the current coronavirus pandemic, money that government disease detectives first tapped to fight the latest outbreak was a congressional fund created for health emergencies. Congress, which has strongly supported the CDC and NIH, rejected a Trump administration budget that might have cut their funding. BIDEN'S CORONAVIRUS PRESS BLITZ MARRED BY DISTRACTING GAFFES While some public health experts have said a bigger concern than White House budgets is the steady erosion of a CDC grant program for state and local public health emergency preparedness — the front lines in detecting and battling new disease. But that decline was set in motion by a congressional budget measure that predates Trump. “The CDC’s response has been excellent, as it has been in the past,” said John Auerbach, president of the nonpartisan Trust for America’s Health, which works with government at all levels to improve the nation’s response to high-risk health crises. Some Democrats have charged that Trump decimated the nation’s public health leadership, but Auerbach said CDC’s top scientific ranks have remained stable the past three years. And, it emerged this week United States was ranked the best-prepared country in the world to handle a pandemic in late 2019 by the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (JHCHS) -- an assessment seemingly at odds with claims by Democrats that the Trump administration left the country vulnerable to the ongoing coronavirus outbreak. The Global Health Security Index was "developed with guidance from an international panel of experts from 13 countries, with research by the Economist Intelligence Unit" from 2018 to 2019, The Washington Post reported last year. "More than 100 researchers spent a year collecting and validating publicly available data.” At the same time, the paper noted that the U.S. score was still not perfect, and that "factors driving down the U.S. score include the risks of social unrest and terrorism, and low public confidence in government." SEE THE FULL 2019 GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY INDEX RANKINGS Trump's campaign has argued in recent days that misinformation may be one of the leading causes of that lack of confidence. For example, Trump's team has pointed to Biden's claims that "no one on the National Security Council staff was put in charge" of pandemic preparedness, based on a report that in May 2018, then-National Security Adviser John Bolton eliminated the NSC’s Office of Global Health Security and Biodefense in a reorganization effort. Rear Adm. R. Timothy Ziemer reportedly was ousted as senior director, and no replacement was named. But, FactCheck.org has determined that the matter amounted to a reorganization, and that “some team members [of the NSC pandemic office] were shifted to other groups, and others took over some of [the top official’s] duties.” Separately, the Biden team has repeatedly argued that the president once referred to coronavirus as a "hoax." That claim has been refuted by numerous fact-checkers, including the Post's, which found that Trump was clearly referring to Democrats' efforts to blame him for the pandemic, not the virus itself. Biden's advisors nonetheless were repeating the claim on Friday. Further, a recent report by Reuters that the U.S. had recently terminated a CDC position in China was widely cited by Democrats and reporters as evidence of a lack of preparedness, and formed the basis for a reporter's question at a recent White House coronavirus briefing. But, the article itself made clear that experts didn't think the move had anything to do with the spread of coronavirus in the United States. "One disease expert told Reuters he was skeptical that the U.S. resident adviser would have been able to get earlier or better information to the Trump administration, given the Chinese government’s suppression of information," the outlet noted. “In the end, based on circumstances in China, it probably wouldn’t have made a big difference,” former CDC epidemiologist and Emory University professor Scott McNabb told Reuters. “The problem was how the Chinese handled it," McNabb continued. "What should have changed was the Chinese should have acknowledged it earlier and didn’t. ” -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 60.248.203.163 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/nCoV2019/M.1585531965.A.D99.html

03/30 09:34, 4年前 , 1F
你沒看美左在台灣風向也帶很兇
03/30 09:34, 1F
所以昨天希拉蕊推特酸川普才會讓美國鄉民大爆炸 民主黨整個做過火火燒自己 尤其美國人最大的逆麟就是國難時還鬥爭自己總統 對美國人來說國難當頭要的是同心齊力愛國,民主黨犯大忌 ※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:36:07

03/30 09:34, 4年前 , 2F
之前有人一直炮川普拒絕WHO測試盒
03/30 09:34, 2F

03/30 09:34, 4年前 , 3F
FOX不是板規允許的新聞媒體喔
03/30 09:34, 3F
講句不客氣 如果FOX這種知名媒體都不能算允許的,還有甚麼可允許??? CNN/BBC都可以為何FOX不行??

03/30 09:35, 4年前 , 4F
結果現在證明這些中國測試盒是垃圾
03/30 09:35, 4F
※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:36:57

03/30 09:37, 4年前 , 5F
8年遺毒?
03/30 09:37, 5F

03/30 09:37, 4年前 , 6F
歐巴馬不愧是美國共產黨
03/30 09:37, 6F

03/30 09:38, 4年前 , 7F
民主黨人都有一顆共產心
03/30 09:38, 7F

03/30 09:39, 4年前 , 8F
CNN也不行啊 你是不是不知道版規有修訂
03/30 09:39, 8F

03/30 09:39, 4年前 , 9F
BBC跟CNN還是不太一樣
03/30 09:39, 9F
這種根本差別待遇 所以bbc國營就沒有帶風向問題??? 那之前英國情侶那篇報導怎麼算?? 德國之聲一堆幫中國帶風向的算不算假新聞?? (德國之聲背後是德國政府資金) ※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:41:04

03/30 09:39, 4年前 , 10F
新版規規定只有"公營媒體"的文章可以貼
03/30 09:39, 10F

03/30 09:40, 4年前 , 11F
要在這版PO就照版規啊,不然就PO去八卦版
03/30 09:40, 11F
反駁不了只好拿板規壓人是吧

03/30 09:40, 4年前 , 12F
BBC是可以的 但是CNN不行
03/30 09:40, 12F
※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:41:40

03/30 09:41, 4年前 , 13F
美國民主黨也跟民眾黨一樣捅到馬蜂窩了喔
03/30 09:41, 13F

03/30 09:41, 4年前 , 14F
嚇我一跳,想說CNN甚麼時候可以了
03/30 09:41, 14F

03/30 09:41, 4年前 , 15F
這啥
03/30 09:41, 15F

03/30 09:42, 4年前 , 16F
板主制度的板規要遵守 就這樣
03/30 09:42, 16F

03/30 09:42, 4年前 , 17F
現在怪來怪去,不如面對現實解決問題
03/30 09:42, 17F

03/30 09:43, 4年前 , 18F
不是有沒限制的八卦版嗎?
03/30 09:43, 18F

03/30 09:43, 4年前 , 19F
你覺得不合理就去建議,而不是在這邊吵
03/30 09:43, 19F

03/30 09:43, 4年前 , 20F
你說英國情侶帶風向 那這篇不也是共和
03/30 09:43, 20F

03/30 09:44, 4年前 , 21F
制度沒修改前我覺得就是照規定走...
03/30 09:44, 21F

03/30 09:44, 4年前 , 22F
黨在帶風向
03/30 09:44, 22F
人家至少拿公開聯邦預算出來,有錯嗎??

03/30 09:44, 4年前 , 23F
衝擊版規者再現惹~~又要衝一波了嗎
03/30 09:44, 23F
※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:44:49

03/30 09:44, 4年前 , 24F
BBC可以 CNN FOX不行 什麼鬼
03/30 09:44, 24F

03/30 09:44, 4年前 , 25F
真的該讓美國人民了解真相
03/30 09:44, 25F

03/30 09:44, 4年前 , 26F
推 這版警察真多 做過小心順風變逆風
03/30 09:44, 26F

03/30 09:44, 4年前 , 27F
版龜就是這樣 規則都站方自己定的 @@
03/30 09:44, 27F

03/30 09:45, 4年前 , 28F
你要Po就去跟板主反應啊,板規目前就是
03/30 09:45, 28F

03/30 09:45, 4年前 , 29F
這樣規定,照規定走懂嗎?想不客氣的講
03/30 09:45, 29F

03/30 09:45, 4年前 , 30F
話就去對著訂定板規的人嘛,只對無辜的
03/30 09:45, 30F

03/30 09:45, 4年前 , 31F
大聲有比較理性嗎?
03/30 09:45, 31F

03/30 09:45, 4年前 , 32F
"商業媒體"跟"公營媒體"的區別有很難嗎
03/30 09:45, 32F

03/30 09:45, 4年前 , 33F
我是不知道你有沒有實際看過FOX節目啦
03/30 09:45, 33F
不爽美國左派被打臉就拿數字打臉這篇報導阿 人家至少引經據典

03/30 09:47, 4年前 , 34F
覺得板規只限那些媒體真的是有點無聊
03/30 09:47, 34F

03/30 09:47, 4年前 , 35F
,只有那幾家可信的依據在哪
03/30 09:47, 35F
※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:48:16

03/30 09:47, 4年前 , 36F
我贊成 fox 應該要合理,我住美國
03/30 09:47, 36F

03/30 09:47, 4年前 , 37F
bcc 跟cnn 這倆個媒體 看似中立原則
03/30 09:47, 37F

03/30 09:48, 4年前 , 38F
好歹公營媒體的標題跟內文比較不會
03/30 09:48, 38F

03/30 09:48, 4年前 , 39F
但實際上因此掩蓋了許多事情
03/30 09:48, 39F
BBC之前還掩蓋其下主持人長期性侵案呢

03/30 09:48, 4年前 , 40F
那麼聳動啦
03/30 09:48, 40F
聳動?? 這個是事實報導 ※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:49:24

03/30 09:48, 4年前 , 41F
這是非常大媒體,我贊成 cnn 跟fox 要一起
03/30 09:48, 41F

03/30 09:48, 4年前 , 42F
允許
03/30 09:48, 42F

03/30 09:49, 4年前 , 43F
或許是因為不想發生假新聞疑慮
03/30 09:49, 43F
BBC報我們虐待英國情侶不就假新聞?? 最好公營媒體不會有假新聞問題 德國之聲也一堆中國大外宣報導好嗎 ※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:50:35

03/30 09:50, 4年前 , 44F
但也因此 當中國掩蓋疫情時 他們只報
03/30 09:50, 44F

03/30 09:50, 4年前 , 45F
03/30 09:50, 45F

03/30 09:50, 4年前 , 46F
美國左派被打臉乾我屁事喔XDDD
03/30 09:50, 46F

03/30 09:50, 4年前 , 47F
中國政府給的 ......
03/30 09:50, 47F

03/30 09:50, 4年前 , 48F
我立場共和黨好嗎 我只是想表達
03/30 09:50, 48F

03/30 09:50, 4年前 , 49F
03/30 09:50, 49F

03/30 09:50, 4年前 , 50F
這兩家到底有奪爛而已
03/30 09:50, 50F

03/30 09:51, 4年前 , 51F
民主黨大本營都死的慘慘 要說活該嗎?
03/30 09:51, 51F

03/30 09:52, 4年前 , 52F
這些日子來 BBC 跟CNN 真的爛...
03/30 09:52, 52F
不要漏了德國之聲 ※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:54:19

03/30 09:54, 4年前 , 53F
話說bcc 的中文媒體部門更爛......
03/30 09:54, 53F

03/30 09:54, 4年前 , 54F
封中時中天就算了 封全球主流媒體很
03/30 09:54, 54F

03/30 09:54, 4年前 , 55F
奇怪
03/30 09:54, 55F

03/30 09:54, 4年前 , 56F
cnn 自從全意反川普後就很沒格調了
03/30 09:54, 56F

03/30 09:54, 4年前 , 57F
我曾經也是很喜歡他們的
03/30 09:54, 57F

03/30 09:56, 4年前 , 58F
開放的是公共媒體吧,CNN FOX是商業電台
03/30 09:56, 58F

03/30 09:56, 4年前 , 59F
這篇可以嗎?
03/30 09:56, 59F

03/30 09:56, 4年前 , 60F
反正就是官媒傳聲筒互鬥 狗咬狗一嘴毛
03/30 09:56, 60F

03/30 09:56, 4年前 , 61F
與其吵CNN/FOX 不如吵為何不開放
03/30 09:56, 61F

03/30 09:57, 4年前 , 62F
美聯社or路透社
03/30 09:57, 62F

03/30 09:57, 4年前 , 63F
外媒的中文部門裡應該一堆中國人
03/30 09:57, 63F

03/30 09:58, 4年前 , 64F
03/30 09:58, 64F

03/30 09:59, 4年前 , 65F
外媒中文網中國人多就算了 連裡面
03/30 09:59, 65F

03/30 09:59, 4年前 , 66F
常駐中國的外國人腦袋也超紅 =.=
03/30 09:59, 66F

03/30 10:00, 4年前 , 67F
知名媒體誰說了算?光是台灣三自民中就吵不完
03/30 10:00, 67F

03/30 10:00, 4年前 , 68F
之前還在NYT中文網看到一個老外專欄
03/30 10:00, 68F

03/30 10:00, 4年前 , 69F
目前版規就這樣,不然開放到後來又唯讀
03/30 10:00, 69F

03/30 10:00, 4年前 , 70F
瘋狂舔習共防疫好棒棒 美國好爛爛
03/30 10:00, 70F
文章代碼(AID): #1UWKmzsP (nCoV2019)