[新聞] 歐巴馬才是那個大砍CDC預算的元凶已刪文
簡單說,就是拜登指控川普砍CDC預算導致防疫不力
但FactCheck.org這個網站調查發現
實際上川普執政下CDC的預算是有被國會加回去的
真正砍CDC預算的是誰???就是歐巴馬
(拜登那時可是副總統)
歐巴馬在2013財政年度給CDC砍了5.69億美元
2015財政年度預算中,砍4.14億美元
2017財政年度預算??2.51億美元
別以為趁防疫時打選戰抹黑是台灣的專利,老美也玩這套
完整標題:
Obama admin repeatedly sought millions in CDC funding cuts, despite Biden's
attacks on Trump preparedness
發稿單位:
Foxnews
發稿時間:
2020/3/27
撰 稿 者:
Gregg Re | Fox News
原文連結:https://reurl.cc/z8WxXQ
Get all the latest news on coronavirus and more delivered daily to your
inbox. Sign up here.
The Obama administration repeatedly sought to cut hundreds of millions of
dollars in funding to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
yearly budget requests show -- seemingly undercutting former Vice President
Joe Biden's repeated attacks on the Trump White House for its pandemic
preparedness.
Numerous Democrats, including Biden, have falsely claimed that Trump slashed
the CDC budget, and Biden has suggested that he would never pursue similar
cuts. The Associated Press has noted that those claims "distort" the facts,
with FactCheck.org pointing out that CDC funding has actually increased under
the current administration, largely because Congress insisted on maintaining
funding levels for both CDC and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Nevertheless, speaking to ABC News' “This Week” on March 1, Biden claimed:
“They’ve cut the funding for the CDC.” On Friday, Biden stepped up his
attacks, writing on Twitter: "Donald Trump's careless, shortsighted actions
left our nation ill-prepared and now Americans are paying the price."
In its fiscal year 2013 budget, while Biden was vice president, the Obama
administration sought a total funding level of $5.9 billion from the CDC, or
a $569 million cut from the 2012 budget of $6.46 billion. In fiscal year
2015, the Obama administration wanted a $414 million cut year-over-year, and
again in the fiscal year 2017 budget, the Obama administration looked to
eliminate $251 million in CDC funding.
The proposed cuts take into account money budgeted for The Prevention and
Public Health Fund, which was established under the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act of 2010 to bolster the nation's health care system. When
not including that fund, the Obama administration sought CDC cuts in five of
its eight years.
Some of the Obama administration's cuts specifically took aim at the CDC's
preparedness initiatives.
“Now, President Obama’s 2012 budget calls for paring some of that spending.
Funding for a public health emergency preparedness program run by the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention was cut by about $72 million below fiscal
2010 levels in the budget proposal.” The Wall Street Journal reported in
2012.
Those cuts would later intensify. “The US Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) takes a hit of about $270 million in the Obama
administration's proposed fiscal year 2014 budget, including significant cuts
to biodefense and emergency preparedness programs," according to a 2013 post
from the Center For Infectious Disease Research And Policy.
US WAS BEST-PREPARED COUNTRY IN WORLD TO HANDLE PANDEMICS, JOHNS HOPKINS FOUND
Then, in 2015, President Obama called for $50 million in budget cuts amid a
measles outbreak -- and White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest's claims
that ObamaCare would pick up the slack were rated false by The Washington
Post's fact-checker.
“Chipping away at 317 funds — even if the majority of cuts are going toward
vaccine purchases — jeopardizes the immunization system in general,
public-health officials and advocates say. It restricts the ability of local
public health departments to prepare for and respond to outbreaks and educate
providers, Chris Aldridge, senior director for infectious disease at the
National Association of County and City Health Officials, told The Washington
Post in 2015.
During the current coronavirus pandemic, money that government disease
detectives first tapped to fight the latest outbreak was a congressional fund
created for health emergencies. Congress, which has strongly supported the
CDC and NIH, rejected a Trump administration budget that might have cut their
funding.
BIDEN'S CORONAVIRUS PRESS BLITZ MARRED BY DISTRACTING GAFFES
While some public health experts have said a bigger concern than White House
budgets is the steady erosion of a CDC grant program for state and local
public health emergency preparedness — the front lines in detecting and
battling new disease. But that decline was set in motion by a congressional
budget measure that predates Trump.
“The CDC’s response has been excellent, as it has been in the past,” said
John Auerbach, president of the nonpartisan Trust for America’s Health,
which works with government at all levels to improve the nation’s response
to high-risk health crises. Some Democrats have charged that Trump decimated
the nation’s public health leadership, but Auerbach said CDC’s top
scientific ranks have remained stable the past three years.
And, it emerged this week United States was ranked the best-prepared country
in the world to handle a pandemic in late 2019 by the Nuclear Threat
Initiative (NTI) and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (JHCHS) --
an assessment seemingly at odds with claims by Democrats that the Trump
administration left the country vulnerable to the ongoing coronavirus
outbreak.
The Global Health Security Index was "developed with guidance from an
international panel of experts from 13 countries, with research by the
Economist Intelligence Unit" from 2018 to 2019, The Washington Post reported
last year. "More than 100 researchers spent a year collecting and validating
publicly available data.”
At the same time, the paper noted that the U.S. score was still not perfect,
and that "factors driving down the U.S. score include the risks of social
unrest and terrorism, and low public confidence in government."
SEE THE FULL 2019 GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY INDEX RANKINGS
Trump's campaign has argued in recent days that misinformation may be one of
the leading causes of that lack of confidence. For example, Trump's team has
pointed to Biden's claims that "no one on the National Security Council staff
was put in charge" of pandemic preparedness, based on a report that in May
2018, then-National Security Adviser John Bolton eliminated the NSC’s Office
of Global Health Security and Biodefense in a reorganization effort.
Rear Adm. R. Timothy Ziemer reportedly was ousted as senior director, and no
replacement was named. But, FactCheck.org has determined that the matter
amounted to a reorganization, and that “some team members [of the NSC
pandemic office] were shifted to other groups, and others took over some of
[the top official’s] duties.”
Separately, the Biden team has repeatedly argued that the president once
referred to coronavirus as a "hoax." That claim has been refuted by numerous
fact-checkers, including the Post's, which found that Trump was clearly
referring to Democrats' efforts to blame him for the pandemic, not the virus
itself. Biden's advisors nonetheless were repeating the claim on Friday.
Further, a recent report by Reuters that the U.S. had recently terminated a
CDC position in China was widely cited by Democrats and reporters as evidence
of a lack of preparedness, and formed the basis for a reporter's question at
a recent White House coronavirus briefing.
But, the article itself made clear that experts didn't think the move had
anything to do with the spread of coronavirus in the United States.
"One disease expert told Reuters he was skeptical that the U.S. resident
adviser would have been able to get earlier or better information to the
Trump administration, given the Chinese government’s suppression of
information," the outlet noted.
“In the end, based on circumstances in China, it probably wouldn’t have
made a big difference,” former CDC epidemiologist and Emory University
professor Scott McNabb told Reuters.
“The problem was how the Chinese handled it," McNabb continued. "What should
have changed was the Chinese should have acknowledged it earlier and didn’t.
”
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 60.248.203.163 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/nCoV2019/M.1585531965.A.D99.html
推
03/30 09:34,
4年前
, 1F
03/30 09:34, 1F
所以昨天希拉蕊推特酸川普才會讓美國鄉民大爆炸
民主黨整個做過火火燒自己
尤其美國人最大的逆麟就是國難時還鬥爭自己總統
對美國人來說國難當頭要的是同心齊力愛國,民主黨犯大忌
※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:36:07
→
03/30 09:34,
4年前
, 2F
03/30 09:34, 2F
推
03/30 09:34,
4年前
, 3F
03/30 09:34, 3F
講句不客氣
如果FOX這種知名媒體都不能算允許的,還有甚麼可允許???
CNN/BBC都可以為何FOX不行??
→
03/30 09:35,
4年前
, 4F
03/30 09:35, 4F
※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:36:57
推
03/30 09:37,
4年前
, 5F
03/30 09:37, 5F
→
03/30 09:37,
4年前
, 6F
03/30 09:37, 6F
→
03/30 09:38,
4年前
, 7F
03/30 09:38, 7F
推
03/30 09:39,
4年前
, 8F
03/30 09:39, 8F
→
03/30 09:39,
4年前
, 9F
03/30 09:39, 9F
這種根本差別待遇
所以bbc國營就沒有帶風向問題???
那之前英國情侶那篇報導怎麼算??
德國之聲一堆幫中國帶風向的算不算假新聞??
(德國之聲背後是德國政府資金)
※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:41:04
→
03/30 09:39,
4年前
, 10F
03/30 09:39, 10F
推
03/30 09:40,
4年前
, 11F
03/30 09:40, 11F
反駁不了只好拿板規壓人是吧
→
03/30 09:40,
4年前
, 12F
03/30 09:40, 12F
※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:41:40
推
03/30 09:41,
4年前
, 13F
03/30 09:41, 13F
推
03/30 09:41,
4年前
, 14F
03/30 09:41, 14F
→
03/30 09:41,
4年前
, 15F
03/30 09:41, 15F
→
03/30 09:42,
4年前
, 16F
03/30 09:42, 16F
→
03/30 09:42,
4年前
, 17F
03/30 09:42, 17F
推
03/30 09:43,
4年前
, 18F
03/30 09:43, 18F
推
03/30 09:43,
4年前
, 19F
03/30 09:43, 19F
→
03/30 09:43,
4年前
, 20F
03/30 09:43, 20F
→
03/30 09:44,
4年前
, 21F
03/30 09:44, 21F
→
03/30 09:44,
4年前
, 22F
03/30 09:44, 22F
人家至少拿公開聯邦預算出來,有錯嗎??
推
03/30 09:44,
4年前
, 23F
03/30 09:44, 23F
※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:44:49
→
03/30 09:44,
4年前
, 24F
03/30 09:44, 24F
推
03/30 09:44,
4年前
, 25F
03/30 09:44, 25F
推
03/30 09:44,
4年前
, 26F
03/30 09:44, 26F
推
03/30 09:44,
4年前
, 27F
03/30 09:44, 27F
推
03/30 09:45,
4年前
, 28F
03/30 09:45, 28F
→
03/30 09:45,
4年前
, 29F
03/30 09:45, 29F
→
03/30 09:45,
4年前
, 30F
03/30 09:45, 30F
→
03/30 09:45,
4年前
, 31F
03/30 09:45, 31F
→
03/30 09:45,
4年前
, 32F
03/30 09:45, 32F
→
03/30 09:45,
4年前
, 33F
03/30 09:45, 33F
不爽美國左派被打臉就拿數字打臉這篇報導阿
人家至少引經據典
推
03/30 09:47,
4年前
, 34F
03/30 09:47, 34F
→
03/30 09:47,
4年前
, 35F
03/30 09:47, 35F
※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:48:16
推
03/30 09:47,
4年前
, 36F
03/30 09:47, 36F
推
03/30 09:47,
4年前
, 37F
03/30 09:47, 37F
推
03/30 09:48,
4年前
, 38F
03/30 09:48, 38F
→
03/30 09:48,
4年前
, 39F
03/30 09:48, 39F
BBC之前還掩蓋其下主持人長期性侵案呢
→
03/30 09:48,
4年前
, 40F
03/30 09:48, 40F
聳動??
這個是事實報導
※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:49:24
→
03/30 09:48,
4年前
, 41F
03/30 09:48, 41F
→
03/30 09:48,
4年前
, 42F
03/30 09:48, 42F
→
03/30 09:49,
4年前
, 43F
03/30 09:49, 43F
BBC報我們虐待英國情侶不就假新聞??
最好公營媒體不會有假新聞問題
德國之聲也一堆中國大外宣報導好嗎
※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:50:35
→
03/30 09:50,
4年前
, 44F
03/30 09:50, 44F
→
03/30 09:50,
4年前
, 45F
03/30 09:50, 45F
→
03/30 09:50,
4年前
, 46F
03/30 09:50, 46F
→
03/30 09:50,
4年前
, 47F
03/30 09:50, 47F
→
03/30 09:50,
4年前
, 48F
03/30 09:50, 48F
推
03/30 09:50,
4年前
, 49F
03/30 09:50, 49F
→
03/30 09:50,
4年前
, 50F
03/30 09:50, 50F
→
03/30 09:51,
4年前
, 51F
03/30 09:51, 51F
推
03/30 09:52,
4年前
, 52F
03/30 09:52, 52F
不要漏了德國之聲
※ 編輯: nightmaresea (60.248.203.163 臺灣), 03/30/2020 09:54:19
推
03/30 09:54,
4年前
, 53F
03/30 09:54, 53F
推
03/30 09:54,
4年前
, 54F
03/30 09:54, 54F
→
03/30 09:54,
4年前
, 55F
03/30 09:54, 55F
推
03/30 09:54,
4年前
, 56F
03/30 09:54, 56F
→
03/30 09:54,
4年前
, 57F
03/30 09:54, 57F
→
03/30 09:56,
4年前
, 58F
03/30 09:56, 58F
→
03/30 09:56,
4年前
, 59F
03/30 09:56, 59F
推
03/30 09:56,
4年前
, 60F
03/30 09:56, 60F
→
03/30 09:56,
4年前
, 61F
03/30 09:56, 61F
→
03/30 09:57,
4年前
, 62F
03/30 09:57, 62F
推
03/30 09:57,
4年前
, 63F
03/30 09:57, 63F
推
03/30 09:58,
4年前
, 64F
03/30 09:58, 64F
推
03/30 09:59,
4年前
, 65F
03/30 09:59, 65F
→
03/30 09:59,
4年前
, 66F
03/30 09:59, 66F
→
03/30 10:00,
4年前
, 67F
03/30 10:00, 67F
→
03/30 10:00,
4年前
, 68F
03/30 10:00, 68F
推
03/30 10:00,
4年前
, 69F
03/30 10:00, 69F
→
03/30 10:00,
4年前
, 70F
03/30 10:00, 70F