[討論] 為什麼DC再也拍不出Watchmen這樣的作品
守護者一直是筆者最喜愛的超級英雄電影前五名
(其他四名是黑暗騎士、X戰警第一戰、鋼鐵人1、美國隊長3)
守護者雖然出現的角色眾多 情況跟自殺小隊有點類似
但每個角色都能有所著墨 讓觀眾得以深入了解他們的個性
1.笑匠:憤世忌俗 玩世不恭 被人形容有納粹傾向
2.變臉羅夏:正義感極強 即使面對世界末日 也不妥協 對的事就是要堅持
(面對智謀者用計讓美蘇雙方避免了一場毀滅人類的核戰 他仍要揭發此陰謀)
3.絲鬼二代:個性算是敢愛敢恨
4.夜梟二代:感覺有點老實老實的 也很替人著想
(警告智謀者有人在暗殺蒙面英雄 潛入監獄救出變臉羅夏)
5.曼哈頓博士:取得超能力後因為太接近神的境界
對人類世界的紛紛擾擾開始有點莫不關心
6.智謀者:自稱是亞歷山大帝後代 以世界統一為矢志
透過所謂的必要之惡(使用曼哈頓博士能量殺死許多大城市的人民)
來換得人類的和平 結束美蘇即將爆發的核戰
角色的著墨實在是比自殺小隊強很多
當然跟他片長將近三個小時也是拖不了關係
而終於開始發展的DCEU 目前的三部作品 MOS BVS SS
除了鋼鐵英雄算是比較多好評之外
BVS跟SS都算是惡評如潮 (搞到還要拉漫威的雷神索爾/浩克來救援)
重點是守護者/鋼鐵英雄/BVS 其實都是出自Zack之手
為什麼他能將守護者拍成神片
卻把鋼鐵英雄拍成了普片
更又把BVS拍成糞片呢???
是編劇的問題? 剪接的問題? 高層介入的問題?
還是原著的問題? 但我相信原著是最不可能出問題
因為DC的原著動畫電影都超好看的RRRRRRRRRRRRRR
(其實自殺小隊直接把動畫"血濺阿卡漢"的劇情直接搬到真人電影
說不定評價會好很多 反正看過DC動畫電影的人應該還算少數)
Zack究竟是怎麼從守護者的水準 墮落到BVS的
有沒有八卦?
大家討論看看
--
是先有雞,還是先有蛋?
是先有搖滾樂,還是先有齊柏林飛船?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 116.241.200.133
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/movie/M.1472969388.A.A0E.html
推
09/04 14:10, , 1F
09/04 14:10, 1F
推
09/04 14:10, , 2F
09/04 14:10, 2F
推
09/04 14:12, , 3F
09/04 14:12, 3F
推
09/04 14:14, , 4F
09/04 14:14, 4F
→
09/04 14:15, , 5F
09/04 14:15, 5F
推
09/04 14:16, , 6F
09/04 14:16, 6F
→
09/04 14:16, , 7F
09/04 14:16, 7F
→
09/04 14:17, , 8F
09/04 14:17, 8F
→
09/04 14:17, , 9F
09/04 14:17, 9F
→
09/04 14:21, , 10F
09/04 14:21, 10F
→
09/04 14:22, , 11F
09/04 14:22, 11F
噓
09/04 14:22, , 12F
09/04 14:22, 12F
推
09/04 14:24, , 13F
09/04 14:24, 13F
推
09/04 14:32, , 14F
09/04 14:32, 14F
噓
09/04 14:35, , 15F
09/04 14:35, 15F
→
09/04 14:40, , 16F
09/04 14:40, 16F
噓
09/04 14:43, , 17F
09/04 14:43, 17F
→
09/04 14:45, , 18F
09/04 14:45, 18F
→
09/04 14:46, , 19F
09/04 14:46, 19F
推
09/04 14:53, , 20F
09/04 14:53, 20F
推
09/04 15:00, , 21F
09/04 15:00, 21F
推
09/04 15:19, , 22F
09/04 15:19, 22F
→
09/04 15:26, , 23F
09/04 15:26, 23F
→
09/04 15:28, , 24F
09/04 15:28, 24F
推
09/04 15:39, , 25F
09/04 15:39, 25F
推
09/04 16:04, , 26F
09/04 16:04, 26F
推
09/04 16:05, , 27F
09/04 16:05, 27F
→
09/04 16:06, , 28F
09/04 16:06, 28F
推
09/04 16:08, , 29F
09/04 16:08, 29F
推
09/04 16:15, , 30F
09/04 16:15, 30F
推
09/04 16:23, , 31F
09/04 16:23, 31F
推
09/04 16:26, , 32F
09/04 16:26, 32F
推
09/04 16:47, , 33F
09/04 16:47, 33F
噓
09/04 17:01, , 34F
09/04 17:01, 34F
推
09/04 17:12, , 35F
09/04 17:12, 35F
→
09/04 17:12, , 36F
09/04 17:12, 36F
噓
09/04 17:13, , 37F
09/04 17:13, 37F
推
09/04 17:15, , 38F
09/04 17:15, 38F
→
09/04 17:15, , 39F
09/04 17:15, 39F
→
09/04 17:15, , 40F
09/04 17:15, 40F
推
09/04 17:18, , 41F
09/04 17:18, 41F
推
09/04 17:38, , 42F
09/04 17:38, 42F
→
09/04 17:38, , 43F
09/04 17:38, 43F
→
09/04 17:38, , 44F
09/04 17:38, 44F
→
09/04 17:39, , 45F
09/04 17:39, 45F
→
09/04 17:41, , 46F
09/04 17:41, 46F
→
09/04 17:41, , 47F
09/04 17:41, 47F
推
09/04 17:41, , 48F
09/04 17:41, 48F
→
09/04 17:45, , 49F
09/04 17:45, 49F
→
09/04 17:45, , 50F
09/04 17:45, 50F
→
09/04 17:45, , 51F
09/04 17:45, 51F
→
09/04 17:45, , 52F
09/04 17:45, 52F
→
09/04 17:45, , 53F
09/04 17:45, 53F
推
09/04 17:47, , 54F
09/04 17:47, 54F
→
09/04 17:47, , 55F
09/04 17:47, 55F
→
09/04 17:52, , 56F
09/04 17:52, 56F
推
09/04 18:40, , 57F
09/04 18:40, 57F
推
09/04 18:41, , 58F
09/04 18:41, 58F
推
09/04 19:42, , 59F
09/04 19:42, 59F
推
09/04 19:49, , 60F
09/04 19:49, 60F
推
09/04 20:02, , 61F
09/04 20:02, 61F
→
09/04 20:02, , 62F
09/04 20:02, 62F
推
09/04 23:31, , 63F
09/04 23:31, 63F
推
09/05 05:41, , 64F
09/05 05:41, 64F
→
09/05 05:42, , 65F
09/05 05:42, 65F
推
09/06 04:51, , 66F
09/06 04:51, 66F
→
09/06 04:51, , 67F
09/06 04:51, 67F
推
09/06 12:27, , 68F
09/06 12:27, 68F
推
09/08 01:19, , 69F
09/08 01:19, 69F
推
09/12 19:40, , 70F
09/12 19:40, 70F