Re: [請益] 關於Su-24
※ 引述《trashken (上個暱稱)》之銘言:
: 問題:
: 最近想做一台1/72的Su-24戰鬥機
: 看網購主要是Dragon 和一個俄羅斯品牌(Z開頭的)
: 可以請問一下版上有在做飛機的板友
: 對於技術中等的人比較推薦哪一家的模型
: (不限於上面兩家 但不要推IXXXXXI 我受夠了)
: 又俄羅斯品牌的飛機模型說明書是英文的還是俄文的阿
小弟對飛機不熟,不過在估狗了一陣之後,
發現您的運氣可能不是很好─
The best Sukhoi Su-24 in 1/72 for accuaracy is the very hard to find, and
rather expensive when you do, Streem kit. It's overengineered and a bear to
get together, but it IS accurate. The only real downside is that it comes
with no weapons at all.
最好的1/72 Su-24是Streem這個牌子的,
很難找,很貴,很難作,零件太瑣細,沒有附武器組,
但是它很正確。
The Zvezda/Revell one you mentioned in your post has it's origins in Italeri
molds made prior to the fall of the Iron Curtain. The molds have also been
issued by Dragon. Whether you buy Italeri, Dragon, Zvezda or Revell; you're
getting the same base kit. Zvezda and Revell tossed in some nice extra
weapons, but that's the only difference. In passing, it catches the look of
the real plane but doesn't hold up to closer scrutiny.
Zvezda/Revell的SU-24用的是Italeri的零件,
同一組零件先前也曾掛著Dragon的商標上市,
所以無論你買的是Italeri, Dragon, Zvezda 還是 Revell 的Su-24,
你拿到的都會是同一組基本零件,只是有些廠商會因為型號不同稍微加點料。
http://www.britmodeller.com/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t71877.html
有些網頁上的作例也直接將生產廠商標記為"Italeri/Dragon".....
--
sPz101:老大,你說KV-8是一種怪戰車,是怎麼個怪法?
唐老大:我哪知道,我也沒看過,是別人跟我講它很怪的。
sPz101:難道是用炮塔來走路然後用底盤來開火嗎?
唐老大:嗯,這個好!有創意。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.36.246.220
推
07/26 20:21, , 1F
07/26 20:21, 1F
→
07/26 23:02, , 2F
07/26 23:02, 2F
→
07/26 23:04, , 3F
07/26 23:04, 3F
→
07/27 00:03, , 4F
07/27 00:03, 4F
討論串 (同標題文章)