Re: [討論] 這次iphone是不是大家都超失望的
貴 貴在哪裡啦有夠好笑…
一臺算4萬 用個2-3年沒問題
算一台可以用2.5年
平均一年要16000 一個月攤提才1333
比起一台筆電一樣3-4萬 偶爾用一下
手機幾乎醒著大半時間都可以用到
且融合手機相機播放器玩具機…功能於一身
一個月才1333我覺得還嫌少呢
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.217.224.217
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/iPhone/M.1505309893.A.14B.html
→
09/13 21:39, , 1F
09/13 21:39, 1F
推
09/13 21:39, , 2F
09/13 21:39, 2F
→
09/13 21:39, , 3F
09/13 21:39, 3F
推
09/13 21:40, , 4F
09/13 21:40, 4F
噓
09/13 21:40, , 5F
09/13 21:40, 5F
→
09/13 21:42, , 6F
09/13 21:42, 6F
噓
09/13 21:43, , 7F
09/13 21:43, 7F
那種手機…買了能幹嘛 看u2嗎 拍照能看嗎 空間夠嗎 app跑得動嗎?
→
09/13 21:43, , 8F
09/13 21:43, 8F
噓
09/13 21:43, , 9F
09/13 21:43, 9F
最好是…你不就拿著你的安卓機在上ptt
→
09/13 21:43, , 10F
09/13 21:43, 10F
→
09/13 21:43, , 11F
09/13 21:43, 11F
→
09/13 21:43, , 12F
09/13 21:43, 12F
→
09/13 21:43, , 13F
09/13 21:43, 13F
→
09/13 21:44, , 14F
09/13 21:44, 14F
老實說 以使用程度來說 我真覺得很便宜
不知道為啥你會覺得很貴?
→
09/13 21:44, , 15F
09/13 21:44, 15F
重點是…大部分的人都不需要用手機弄這些東西啊 是有多仇視apple
→
09/13 21:45, , 16F
09/13 21:45, 16F
那乾脆你什麼3c都不要買 反正幾年後都是電子垃圾
→
09/13 21:46, , 17F
09/13 21:46, 17F
噓
09/13 21:48, , 18F
09/13 21:48, 18F
沒反串 不傻 傻的是被搞亂的人
※ 編輯: bakuman (49.217.224.217), 09/13/2017 22:04:58
→
09/13 21:56, , 19F
09/13 21:56, 19F
無反串 謝謝!
※ 編輯: bakuman (49.217.224.217), 09/13/2017 22:06:31
→
09/13 22:13, , 20F
09/13 22:13, 20F
推
09/13 22:18, , 21F
09/13 22:18, 21F
噓
09/13 22:19, , 22F
09/13 22:19, 22F
在這篇我只看到一堆安卓粉的自卑感真的很重
→
09/13 22:20, , 23F
09/13 22:20, 23F
→
09/13 22:22, , 24F
09/13 22:22, 24F
推
09/13 22:26, , 25F
09/13 22:26, 25F
噓
09/13 22:26, , 26F
09/13 22:26, 26F
我沒說不行啊 卓粉
→
09/13 22:26, , 27F
09/13 22:26, 27F
我不信你手機是哀鳳
→
09/13 22:26, , 28F
09/13 22:26, 28F
就我而言 筆電對我來說是可有可無的東西 現在回家 誰還會開筆電 除了打打lol、看看
影集
別跟我說你整天在剪影片簡報
--------------------------------------------------------------
※ 編輯: bakuman (49.217.224.217), 09/13/2017 22:41:58
推
09/13 22:35, , 29F
09/13 22:35, 29F
噓
09/13 22:36, , 30F
09/13 22:36, 30F
噓
09/13 22:37, , 31F
09/13 22:37, 31F
噓
09/13 22:38, , 32F
09/13 22:38, 32F
噓
09/13 22:49, , 33F
09/13 22:49, 33F
→
09/13 22:50, , 34F
09/13 22:50, 34F
噓
09/13 22:52, , 35F
09/13 22:52, 35F

→
09/13 22:52, , 36F
09/13 22:52, 36F

→
09/13 22:52, , 37F
09/13 22:52, 37F
噓
09/13 22:53, , 38F
09/13 22:53, 38F
推
09/13 23:07, , 39F
09/13 23:07, 39F
推
09/13 23:39, , 40F
09/13 23:39, 40F
噓
09/13 23:39, , 41F
09/13 23:39, 41F
→
09/13 23:39, , 42F
09/13 23:39, 42F
噓
09/14 00:01, , 43F
09/14 00:01, 43F
噓
09/14 00:19, , 44F
09/14 00:19, 44F
推
09/14 00:42, , 45F
09/14 00:42, 45F
噓
09/14 02:25, , 46F
09/14 02:25, 46F
噓
09/14 02:56, , 47F
09/14 02:56, 47F
噓
09/14 04:25, , 48F
09/14 04:25, 48F
噓
09/14 09:06, , 49F
09/14 09:06, 49F
噓
09/14 09:10, , 50F
09/14 09:10, 50F
→
09/14 09:35, , 51F
09/14 09:35, 51F
→
09/14 09:35, , 52F
09/14 09:35, 52F
→
09/14 09:47, , 53F
09/14 09:47, 53F
噓
09/14 10:36, , 54F
09/14 10:36, 54F
推
09/14 20:22, , 55F
09/14 20:22, 55F
→
09/14 20:22, , 56F
09/14 20:22, 56F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 11 篇):