[討論] 為何這次新色不先出“鋼琴白”
如標題
從 iPhone5 開始機身外殼都採用陽極氧化的方式上色
但陽極氧化有一個嚴重的缺點就是深色上色困難
容易有所謂的掉漆或是上色不均勻的問題
所以 iPhone6/6s 都將黑色調淡至“太空灰”
其實從 iPhone5s 就可以發現黑色比 iPhone5 還要淡了
先前也傳出曜石黑包膜後撕掉發現有整塊掉漆的問題
所以有幾家包膜業者都拒絕替曜石黑包膜
在加上曜石黑的鏡面光澤採用新的工法製成
所以會造成良率比其他色低 嚴重或是難產
回到主題 為何這次蘋果不復刻 iPhone4s 的鋼琴白呢
相對黑色 白色良率更高 也能夠吸引更多客群
因為相較黑色 白色更顯得中性 也可以讓更多女性顧客買單
還是說蘋果打算為了明年十週年 iPhone8 推出更不一樣的花樣呢
蘋果到底打著什麽樣的如意算盤呢
會有這樣的想法是因為蘋果的招牌色是白色
大家怎麽看?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.140.182.223
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/iPhone/M.1476360757.A.C93.html
※ 編輯: shenyang (223.140.182.223), 10/13/2016 20:14:38
推
10/13 20:14, , 1F
10/13 20:14, 1F
明年不會出曜石黑嗎?先後順序怎麼賺沒差吧哈哈
※ 編輯: shenyang (223.140.182.223), 10/13/2016 20:15:08
→
10/13 20:14, , 2F
10/13 20:14, 2F
推
10/13 20:16, , 3F
10/13 20:16, 3F
的確淺色良率更高沒錯啊 你可以去爬文
推
10/13 20:17, , 4F
10/13 20:17, 4F
推
10/13 20:17, , 5F
10/13 20:17, 5F
應該不會吧... 畢竟是鋁 不是那些保護套的材質...
※ 編輯: shenyang (223.140.182.223), 10/13/2016 20:18:55
推
10/13 20:29, , 6F
10/13 20:29, 6F
推
10/13 20:38, , 7F
10/13 20:38, 7F
→
10/13 20:41, , 8F
10/13 20:41, 8F
→
10/13 20:42, , 9F
10/13 20:42, 9F
推
10/13 20:44, , 10F
10/13 20:44, 10F
推
10/13 20:46, , 11F
10/13 20:46, 11F
→
10/13 20:47, , 12F
10/13 20:47, 12F
→
10/13 20:48, , 13F
10/13 20:48, 13F
推
10/13 20:48, , 14F
10/13 20:48, 14F
推
10/13 20:49, , 15F
10/13 20:49, 15F
推
10/13 20:53, , 16F
10/13 20:53, 16F
推
10/13 20:54, , 17F
10/13 20:54, 17F
推
10/13 20:55, , 18F
10/13 20:55, 18F
→
10/13 20:58, , 19F
10/13 20:58, 19F
推
10/13 21:02, , 20F
10/13 21:02, 20F
推
10/13 21:07, , 21F
10/13 21:07, 21F
→
10/13 21:07, , 22F
10/13 21:07, 22F
→
10/13 21:09, , 23F
10/13 21:09, 23F
推
10/13 21:14, , 24F
10/13 21:14, 24F
→
10/13 21:15, , 25F
10/13 21:15, 25F
→
10/13 21:15, , 26F
10/13 21:15, 26F
→
10/13 21:16, , 27F
10/13 21:16, 27F
→
10/13 21:32, , 28F
10/13 21:32, 28F
→
10/13 21:32, , 29F
10/13 21:32, 29F
→
10/13 21:32, , 30F
10/13 21:32, 30F
→
10/13 21:32, , 31F
10/13 21:32, 31F
→
10/13 21:32, , 32F
10/13 21:32, 32F
→
10/13 21:34, , 33F
10/13 21:34, 33F
推
10/13 21:42, , 34F
10/13 21:42, 34F
推
10/13 21:43, , 35F
10/13 21:43, 35F
推
10/13 21:44, , 36F
10/13 21:44, 36F
推
10/13 21:56, , 37F
10/13 21:56, 37F
推
10/13 22:01, , 38F
10/13 22:01, 38F
推
10/13 22:02, , 39F
10/13 22:02, 39F
推
10/13 22:02, , 40F
10/13 22:02, 40F
推
10/13 22:11, , 41F
10/13 22:11, 41F
推
10/13 22:18, , 42F
10/13 22:18, 42F
推
10/13 22:20, , 43F
10/13 22:20, 43F
推
10/13 22:22, , 44F
10/13 22:22, 44F
推
10/13 22:28, , 45F
10/13 22:28, 45F
推
10/13 22:29, , 46F
10/13 22:29, 46F
→
10/13 22:33, , 47F
10/13 22:33, 47F
→
10/13 22:33, , 48F
10/13 22:33, 48F
推
10/13 22:55, , 49F
10/13 22:55, 49F
推
10/13 22:57, , 50F
10/13 22:57, 50F
推
10/13 22:58, , 51F
10/13 22:58, 51F
推
10/13 23:17, , 52F
10/13 23:17, 52F
→
10/13 23:29, , 53F
10/13 23:29, 53F
推
10/13 23:53, , 54F
10/13 23:53, 54F
推
10/14 00:07, , 55F
10/14 00:07, 55F
推
10/14 00:13, , 56F
10/14 00:13, 56F
推
10/14 00:13, , 57F
10/14 00:13, 57F
推
10/14 00:19, , 58F
10/14 00:19, 58F
→
10/14 00:28, , 59F
10/14 00:28, 59F
推
10/14 00:28, , 60F
10/14 00:28, 60F
推
10/14 00:28, , 61F
10/14 00:28, 61F
推
10/14 00:29, , 62F
10/14 00:29, 62F
推
10/14 00:33, , 63F
10/14 00:33, 63F
噓
10/14 00:45, , 64F
10/14 00:45, 64F
推
10/14 01:39, , 65F
10/14 01:39, 65F
→
10/14 01:39, , 66F
10/14 01:39, 66F
噓
10/14 01:47, , 67F
10/14 01:47, 67F
推
10/14 02:26, , 68F
10/14 02:26, 68F
推
10/14 02:52, , 69F
10/14 02:52, 69F
→
10/14 03:07, , 70F
10/14 03:07, 70F
推
10/14 03:32, , 71F
10/14 03:32, 71F
推
10/14 05:42, , 72F
10/14 05:42, 72F
推
10/14 06:49, , 73F
10/14 06:49, 73F
推
10/14 09:04, , 74F
10/14 09:04, 74F
→
10/14 09:05, , 75F
10/14 09:05, 75F
噓
10/14 10:41, , 76F
10/14 10:41, 76F
噓
10/14 11:41, , 77F
10/14 11:41, 77F
→
10/14 13:31, , 78F
10/14 13:31, 78F
噓
10/14 14:10, , 79F
10/14 14:10, 79F
推
10/14 14:38, , 80F
10/14 14:38, 80F
推
10/14 19:29, , 81F
10/14 19:29, 81F
噓
10/14 20:09, , 82F
10/14 20:09, 82F
推
10/14 20:10, , 83F
10/14 20:10, 83F
→
10/14 20:11, , 84F
10/14 20:11, 84F
→
10/14 20:12, , 85F
10/14 20:12, 85F
推
10/14 22:06, , 86F
10/14 22:06, 86F
推
10/15 04:13, , 87F
10/15 04:13, 87F
推
10/15 14:19, , 88F
10/15 14:19, 88F
討論串 (同標題文章)