[討論] iPhone7真的有那麼美?
先說 我真的不是來戰的
我雖然沒用哀鳳(窮學生,不想買太貴的手機)
但我真的很喜歡前幾代的哀鳳外型設計
真的很有質感
尤其是5S真的深得我心
不過從6開始我就覺得哀鳳失去了他自己的外型特色
還有那個凸出的鏡頭
讓我覺得他真的少了一些設計感
不過6也還真的不算醜
就只能算是失去自己的特色而已
可是你他媽7那個是發生了什麼事
醜到賈伯斯都哭了吧
那個雙鏡頭是三小誰可以解釋一下???
http://i.imgur.com/mQAPOtJ.jpg

這個東西已經不是有沒有設計感的問題了吧
這個東西就是醜
單純的醜
還有那個天線改成那樣也是看起來一個愚蠢
改成那個蠢德性還不如不改
我承認我是沒信仰
可是各位果粉
你們認真覺得7美嗎?
--
如果我們要把磁鐵棒放進線圈,
線圈會說「不!!不要過來!!」而發出阻力不讓磁鐵棒靠近。
但是如果我們要把放進去的磁鐵棒從線圈拿走,
線圈反而會說「我…我又沒有叫你走!!」而發出阻力不讓磁鐵棒離開。
所以傲嬌這東西根本不是新梗,19世紀就有科學家發現傲嬌了。
民明書房 -《 傲嬌是一種自然現象 》
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.141.74.43
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/iPhone/M.1474001453.A.835.html
噓
09/16 12:51, , 1F
09/16 12:51, 1F
懶人包:7個人主觀來說很醜,想問各位果粉覺得美在哪
推
09/16 12:51, , 2F
09/16 12:51, 2F
噓
09/16 12:51, , 3F
09/16 12:51, 3F
噓
09/16 12:52, , 4F
09/16 12:52, 4F
噓
09/16 12:52, , 5F
09/16 12:52, 5F
→
09/16 12:52, , 6F
09/16 12:52, 6F
噓
09/16 12:53, , 7F
09/16 12:53, 7F
一個不小心太激動了
推
09/16 12:53, , 8F
09/16 12:53, 8F

→
09/16 12:53, , 9F
09/16 12:53, 9F
→
09/16 12:53, , 10F
09/16 12:53, 10F
噓
09/16 12:53, , 11F
09/16 12:53, 11F
推
09/16 12:54, , 12F
09/16 12:54, 12F
→
09/16 12:54, , 13F
09/16 12:54, 13F
噓
09/16 12:55, , 14F
09/16 12:55, 14F
推
09/16 12:55, , 15F
09/16 12:55, 15F
噓
09/16 12:55, , 16F
09/16 12:55, 16F
推
09/16 12:55, , 17F
09/16 12:55, 17F
推
09/16 12:55, , 18F
09/16 12:55, 18F
推
09/16 12:55, , 19F
09/16 12:55, 19F
噓
09/16 12:56, , 20F
09/16 12:56, 20F
推
09/16 12:56, , 21F
09/16 12:56, 21F
噓
09/16 12:56, , 22F
09/16 12:56, 22F
噓
09/16 12:56, , 23F
09/16 12:56, 23F
噓
09/16 12:56, , 24F
09/16 12:56, 24F
→
09/16 12:57, , 25F
09/16 12:57, 25F
噓
09/16 12:57, , 26F
09/16 12:57, 26F
噓
09/16 12:57, , 27F
09/16 12:57, 27F
推
09/16 12:57, , 28F
09/16 12:57, 28F
推
09/16 12:58, , 29F
09/16 12:58, 29F
→
09/16 12:58, , 30F
09/16 12:58, 30F
噓
09/16 12:59, , 31F
09/16 12:59, 31F
噓
09/16 12:59, , 32F
09/16 12:59, 32F
※ 編輯: mrsheep0629 (223.141.74.43), 09/16/2016 13:01:38
噓
09/16 12:59, , 33F
09/16 12:59, 33F
→
09/16 13:00, , 34F
09/16 13:00, 34F
噓
09/16 13:00, , 35F
09/16 13:00, 35F
噓
09/16 13:01, , 36F
09/16 13:01, 36F
還有 123 則推文
還有 16 段內文
→
09/16 14:49, , 160F
09/16 14:49, 160F
推
09/16 14:49, , 161F
09/16 14:49, 161F
推
09/16 14:58, , 162F
09/16 14:58, 162F
推
09/16 15:01, , 163F
09/16 15:01, 163F
→
09/16 15:01, , 164F
09/16 15:01, 164F
→
09/16 15:02, , 165F
09/16 15:02, 165F
噓
09/16 15:20, , 166F
09/16 15:20, 166F
沒審美觀就算了 還只會跟風讓人笑
噓
09/16 15:38, , 167F
09/16 15:38, 167F
噓
09/16 15:41, , 168F
09/16 15:41, 168F
推
09/16 15:48, , 169F
09/16 15:48, 169F
噓
09/16 15:51, , 170F
09/16 15:51, 170F
→
09/16 15:51, , 171F
09/16 15:51, 171F
推
09/16 15:57, , 172F
09/16 15:57, 172F
噓
09/16 16:29, , 173F
09/16 16:29, 173F
→
09/16 16:37, , 174F
09/16 16:37, 174F
→
09/16 16:37, , 175F
09/16 16:37, 175F
噓
09/16 16:37, , 176F
09/16 16:37, 176F
→
09/16 16:41, , 177F
09/16 16:41, 177F
→
09/16 16:44, , 178F
09/16 16:44, 178F
→
09/16 16:44, , 179F
09/16 16:44, 179F
噓
09/16 16:48, , 180F
09/16 16:48, 180F
推
09/16 16:52, , 181F
09/16 16:52, 181F
我也只是實話實說啦,我也舉出覺得醜的點,也舉出了我覺得我覺得哪些設計很美的點,
結果從發文到現在也沒人跟我說7/7+美在哪然後就噓窮學生啊乾你屁事啊嗯哼嗯哼之類的
沒營養噓文,反擊的水準實在是有點呵呵啊。就說了拜託跟我說覺得哪邊美嘛,說了我就
會仔細去看,還是其實貴版很多人只是跟風買然後跟著喊好潮好潮,完全沒自己的審美觀
而只有品牌信仰?
像wellyv9大就說了消光黑很美大勝6我就覺得這種回應就很實在啊
噓
09/16 18:06, , 182F
09/16 18:06, 182F
推
09/16 18:26, , 183F
09/16 18:26, 183F
可是6就是為了大螢幕才變成那副德性的QQ
推
09/16 19:17, , 184F
09/16 19:17, 184F
噓
09/16 19:23, , 185F
09/16 19:23, 185F
尼最棒
推
09/16 20:33, , 186F
09/16 20:33, 186F
→
09/16 21:15, , 187F
09/16 21:15, 187F
→
09/16 21:15, , 188F
09/16 21:15, 188F
※ 編輯: mrsheep0629 (140.112.243.35), 09/16/2016 22:37:30
噓
09/17 09:36, , 189F
09/17 09:36, 189F
→
09/17 09:36, , 190F
09/17 09:36, 190F
噓
09/17 09:39, , 191F
09/17 09:39, 191F
→
09/17 09:39, , 192F
09/17 09:39, 192F
→
09/17 09:39, , 193F
09/17 09:39, 193F
→
09/18 17:57, , 194F
09/18 17:57, 194F