Re: [討論] "iPhone 7" 哪裡不吸引你?
(原文恕刪)
其實說真的這次的iPhone 7除了顏色之外並沒有很吸引人
雖然說他的內部幾乎都有升級過,但總是覺得沒有特別的新意
撇開爆炸的問題,若是如同三星般有許多突破性新的功能
我想這支手機會讓我非常想入手
仍然用iPhone 6的我認為6對於現在的App系統需求還是非常足夠的
若不是非常重量級的用戶,想必舊款還是能再戰幾年
畢竟如果一隻iPhone不能使用個4~5年,我想就失去了Apple的價值
就像到今天2016還是有許多人正在使用iPhone 4S
關於耳機孔,我想我會等無線充電出來才會認同這樣的作法
我用耳機的時機很大部分是邊充電邊聽的
就例如在車上,沒電的時候接個行充 順便闔眼休息
或者看書的時候邊充電邊聽音樂、廣播
因此很大的機率是與充電一起使用的,因此也是不太考慮的因素
--
墨曲輕挹俗塵埃,赭霞一肩天下難。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 175.180.112.79
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/iPhone/M.1473568123.A.4B7.html
推
09/11 12:31, , 1F
09/11 12:31, 1F
※ 編輯: kingfsg7326 (175.180.112.79), 09/11/2016 12:36:01
推
09/11 12:38, , 2F
09/11 12:38, 2F
→
09/11 12:40, , 3F
09/11 12:40, 3F
→
09/11 12:40, , 4F
09/11 12:40, 4F
推
09/11 12:58, , 5F
09/11 12:58, 5F
推
09/11 13:00, , 6F
09/11 13:00, 6F
→
09/11 13:04, , 7F
09/11 13:04, 7F
→
09/11 13:07, , 8F
09/11 13:07, 8F
推
09/11 13:09, , 9F
09/11 13:09, 9F
→
09/11 13:11, , 10F
09/11 13:11, 10F
→
09/11 13:12, , 11F
09/11 13:12, 11F
推
09/11 13:14, , 12F
09/11 13:14, 12F
推
09/11 13:19, , 13F
09/11 13:19, 13F
推
09/11 13:23, , 14F
09/11 13:23, 14F
推
09/11 13:33, , 15F
09/11 13:33, 15F
→
09/11 13:33, , 16F
09/11 13:33, 16F
推
09/11 13:35, , 17F
09/11 13:35, 17F
→
09/11 13:38, , 18F
09/11 13:38, 18F
推
09/11 13:46, , 19F
09/11 13:46, 19F
→
09/11 13:55, , 20F
09/11 13:55, 20F
※ 編輯: kingfsg7326 (175.180.112.79), 09/11/2016 13:56:48
→
09/11 13:58, , 21F
09/11 13:58, 21F
推
09/11 13:58, , 22F
09/11 13:58, 22F
→
09/11 14:00, , 23F
09/11 14:00, 23F
→
09/11 14:04, , 24F
09/11 14:04, 24F
→
09/11 14:05, , 25F
09/11 14:05, 25F
推
09/11 14:08, , 26F
09/11 14:08, 26F
→
09/11 14:10, , 27F
09/11 14:10, 27F
推
09/11 14:11, , 28F
09/11 14:11, 28F
懸浮翻譯 虹膜 這些都挺不錯的,還有無線充電其實也不錯 雖然是老梗了
但是目前蘋果就是沒這些東西
※ 編輯: kingfsg7326 (175.180.112.79), 09/11/2016 14:13:05
→
09/11 14:12, , 29F
09/11 14:12, 29F
推
09/11 14:12, , 30F
09/11 14:12, 30F
→
09/11 14:12, , 31F
09/11 14:12, 31F
推
09/11 14:15, , 32F
09/11 14:15, 32F
推
09/11 14:18, , 33F
09/11 14:18, 33F
推
09/11 14:20, , 34F
09/11 14:20, 34F
推
09/11 14:21, , 35F
09/11 14:21, 35F
→
09/11 14:22, , 36F
09/11 14:22, 36F
→
09/11 14:22, , 37F
09/11 14:22, 37F
推
09/11 14:26, , 38F
09/11 14:26, 38F
→
09/11 14:26, , 39F
09/11 14:26, 39F
→
09/11 14:26, , 40F
09/11 14:26, 40F
推
09/11 14:29, , 41F
09/11 14:29, 41F
噓
09/11 14:30, , 42F
09/11 14:30, 42F
→
09/11 14:31, , 43F
09/11 14:31, 43F
→
09/11 14:31, , 44F
09/11 14:31, 44F
好吧 或許我說錯了 應該說亮點比蘋果多 並不是突破
→
09/11 14:35, , 45F
09/11 14:35, 45F
推
09/11 14:36, , 46F
09/11 14:36, 46F
→
09/11 14:37, , 47F
09/11 14:37, 47F
→
09/11 14:37, , 48F
09/11 14:37, 48F
→
09/11 14:37, , 49F
09/11 14:37, 49F
→
09/11 14:43, , 50F
09/11 14:43, 50F
→
09/11 14:44, , 51F
09/11 14:44, 51F
推
09/11 14:45, , 52F
09/11 14:45, 52F
推
09/11 14:45, , 53F
09/11 14:45, 53F
→
09/11 14:46, , 54F
09/11 14:46, 54F
因為變成外接 這其實也就只是變相的妥協新外型或者新設計
但並非是找出另一個取代方案,就只是換個方式使用而已
※ 編輯: kingfsg7326 (175.180.112.79), 09/11/2016 14:50:01
推
09/11 15:00, , 55F
09/11 15:00, 55F
推
09/11 15:13, , 56F
09/11 15:13, 56F
推
09/11 15:15, , 57F
09/11 15:15, 57F
噓
09/11 15:28, , 58F
09/11 15:28, 58F
推
09/11 15:54, , 59F
09/11 15:54, 59F
推
09/11 16:47, , 60F
09/11 16:47, 60F
推
09/11 17:22, , 61F
09/11 17:22, 61F
→
09/11 17:22, , 62F
09/11 17:22, 62F
推
09/11 20:22, , 63F
09/11 20:22, 63F
→
09/11 21:13, , 64F
09/11 21:13, 64F
→
09/11 21:15, , 65F
09/11 21:15, 65F
噓
09/11 23:37, , 66F
09/11 23:37, 66F
推
09/12 04:48, , 67F
09/12 04:48, 67F
推
09/12 07:07, , 68F
09/12 07:07, 68F
→
09/12 07:07, , 69F
09/12 07:07, 69F
噓
09/12 11:51, , 70F
09/12 11:51, 70F
推
09/12 15:11, , 71F
09/12 15:11, 71F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 4 篇):
討論
148
266