[情報] 白忙一場!台積電/三星版電力完全沒差
http://goo.gl/KJD2TK
為了驗證 iPhone 6s 台積電代工的 A9 晶片,和三星代工的在現實生活中使用電池續航
是否有差異,今天有 YouTube 用戶找來了兩台同樣容量、同樣顏色全新開封的 iPhone 6
s,安裝同樣 iOS 9.0.2 系統、同樣亮度 / 音量和備份。一台搭載的是 16nm 台積電 A9
,而另外一台則是 14nm 三星 A9,都沒有內建 SIM 卡和所有的設定也全部相同,來進行
影片播影、遊戲和 4K 拍攝電池續測試。
測試結果:經過 1 小時 720p 影片播放,兩台都是亮度 100%、音量70%,電量同樣都剩
下 70%。接著進行 30 分鐘 4K 影片播放,兩者電量剩餘同樣都是 50%。再進行 1 小時
的 FIFA 遊戲同樣電量都剩 35%。最後又進行了 4K 影片拍攝和輸出,測試到最後兩台的
電池續航和處理速度在日常使用完全一致。
-------------------------------------
有加入方大的粉絲團
之前各種評測顯示三星或多或少地比台積電耗電
方大緊急出來訂規則滅火
說不准討論這兩家CPU的比較文
導致粉絲團呈現「i dont care」的一言堂狀態
結果現在粉絲團自己貼這篇
說別家評測都錯的,這篇網路看到的影片才是對的
自己定規則,自己違規
只許版主違規,不準百姓討論就對了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 39.12.100.246
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/iPhone/M.1444809262.A.34C.html
※ 編輯: flightleaf (39.12.100.246), 10/14/2015 15:54:56
→
10/14 15:56, , 1F
10/14 15:56, 1F
推
10/14 15:56, , 2F
10/14 15:56, 2F
推
10/14 15:57, , 3F
10/14 15:57, 3F
→
10/14 15:58, , 4F
10/14 15:58, 4F
推
10/14 15:58, , 5F
10/14 15:58, 5F
→
10/14 15:59, , 6F
10/14 15:59, 6F
→
10/14 15:59, , 7F
10/14 15:59, 7F
→
10/14 15:59, , 8F
10/14 15:59, 8F
推
10/14 16:00, , 9F
10/14 16:00, 9F
推
10/14 16:01, , 10F
10/14 16:01, 10F
→
10/14 16:02, , 11F
10/14 16:02, 11F
→
10/14 16:02, , 12F
10/14 16:02, 12F
噓
10/14 16:03, , 13F
10/14 16:03, 13F
→
10/14 16:03, , 14F
10/14 16:03, 14F
→
10/14 16:06, , 15F
10/14 16:06, 15F
推
10/14 16:08, , 16F
10/14 16:08, 16F
→
10/14 16:08, , 17F
10/14 16:08, 17F
→
10/14 16:08, , 18F
10/14 16:08, 18F
推
10/14 16:08, , 19F
10/14 16:08, 19F
→
10/14 16:08, , 20F
10/14 16:08, 20F
推
10/14 16:08, , 21F
10/14 16:08, 21F
→
10/14 16:09, , 22F
10/14 16:09, 22F
→
10/14 16:11, , 23F
10/14 16:11, 23F
推
10/14 16:12, , 24F
10/14 16:12, 24F
推
10/14 16:17, , 25F
10/14 16:17, 25F
噓
10/14 16:17, , 26F
10/14 16:17, 26F
推
10/14 16:21, , 27F
10/14 16:21, 27F
噓
10/14 16:26, , 28F
10/14 16:26, 28F
→
10/14 16:26, , 29F
10/14 16:26, 29F
噓
10/14 16:27, , 30F
10/14 16:27, 30F
→
10/14 16:28, , 31F
10/14 16:28, 31F
→
10/14 16:30, , 32F
10/14 16:30, 32F
噓
10/14 16:32, , 33F
10/14 16:32, 33F
噓
10/14 16:35, , 34F
10/14 16:35, 34F
噓
10/14 16:36, , 35F
10/14 16:36, 35F
推
10/14 16:37, , 36F
10/14 16:37, 36F
噓
10/14 16:38, , 37F
10/14 16:38, 37F
→
10/14 16:38, , 38F
10/14 16:38, 38F
推
10/14 16:41, , 39F
10/14 16:41, 39F
推
10/14 16:56, , 40F
10/14 16:56, 40F
推
10/14 16:56, , 41F
10/14 16:56, 41F
噓
10/14 16:58, , 42F
10/14 16:58, 42F
→
10/14 16:58, , 43F
10/14 16:58, 43F
噓
10/14 17:05, , 44F
10/14 17:05, 44F
噓
10/14 17:07, , 45F
10/14 17:07, 45F
噓
10/14 17:09, , 46F
10/14 17:09, 46F
噓
10/14 17:15, , 47F
10/14 17:15, 47F
噓
10/14 17:17, , 48F
10/14 17:17, 48F
噓
10/14 17:23, , 49F
10/14 17:23, 49F
噓
10/14 17:25, , 50F
10/14 17:25, 50F
噓
10/14 17:39, , 51F
10/14 17:39, 51F
噓
10/14 17:39, , 52F
10/14 17:39, 52F
→
10/14 17:47, , 53F
10/14 17:47, 53F
→
10/14 17:48, , 54F
10/14 17:48, 54F
→
10/14 17:48, , 55F
10/14 17:48, 55F
噓
10/14 17:51, , 56F
10/14 17:51, 56F
→
10/14 17:51, , 57F
10/14 17:51, 57F
→
10/14 17:52, , 58F
10/14 17:52, 58F
→
10/14 17:52, , 59F
10/14 17:52, 59F
推
10/14 17:57, , 60F
10/14 17:57, 60F
推
10/14 17:57, , 61F
10/14 17:57, 61F
→
10/14 17:59, , 62F
10/14 17:59, 62F
→
10/14 18:00, , 63F
10/14 18:00, 63F
推
10/14 18:01, , 64F
10/14 18:01, 64F
噓
10/14 18:30, , 65F
10/14 18:30, 65F
→
10/14 18:52, , 66F
10/14 18:52, 66F
推
10/14 19:25, , 67F
10/14 19:25, 67F
→
10/14 19:25, , 68F
10/14 19:25, 68F
推
10/14 19:27, , 69F
10/14 19:27, 69F
→
10/14 19:43, , 70F
10/14 19:43, 70F
噓
10/14 19:45, , 71F
10/14 19:45, 71F
噓
10/14 20:08, , 72F
10/14 20:08, 72F
噓
10/14 20:49, , 73F
10/14 20:49, 73F
推
10/14 21:51, , 74F
10/14 21:51, 74F
噓
10/14 23:03, , 75F
10/14 23:03, 75F
→
10/14 23:14, , 76F
10/14 23:14, 76F
推
10/15 07:41, , 77F
10/15 07:41, 77F
噓
10/15 12:40, , 78F
10/15 12:40, 78F
→
10/15 12:41, , 79F
10/15 12:41, 79F
→
10/15 12:41, , 80F
10/15 12:41, 80F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):